The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) is an anatomically specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) currently used to assess a wide variety of foot and ankle pathology. It consists of 16 items across three subscales measuring distinct but related traits: walking/standing ability, pain, and social interaction. It is the most used foot and ankle PROM in the UK. Initial MOxFQ validation involved analysis of 100 individuals undergoing hallux valgus surgery. This project aimed to establish whether an individual’s response to the MOxFQ varies with anatomical region of disease (measurement invariance), and to explore structural validity of the factor structure (subscale items) of the MOxFQ. This was a single-centre, prospective cohort study involving 6,637 patients (mean age 52 years (SD 17.79)) presenting with a wide range of foot and ankle pathologies between January 2013 and December 2021. To assess whether the MOxFQ responses vary by anatomical region of foot and ankle disease, we performed multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. To assess the structural validity of the subscale items, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed.Aims
Methods
Supracondylar fractures are the most frequently occurring paediatric
fractures about the elbow and may be associated with a neurovascular
injury. The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma
11 (BOAST 11) guidelines describe best practice for supracondylar
fracture management. This study aimed to assess whether emergency
departments in the United Kingdom adhere to BOAST 11 standard 1:
a documented assessment, performed on presentation, must include
the status of the radial pulse, digital capillary refill time, and
the individual function of the radial, median (including the anterior
interosseous), and ulnar nerves. Stage 1: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective audit of adherence
to BOAST 11 standard 1. Data were collected from eight hospitals
in the United Kingdom. A total of 433 children with Gartland type
2 or 3 supracondylar fractures were eligible for inclusion. A centrally
created data collection sheet was used to guide objective analysis
of whether BOAST 11 standard 1 was adhered to. Stage 2: We created
a quality improvement proforma for use in emergency departments.
This was piloted in one of the hospitals used in the primary audit
and was re-audited using equivalent methodology. In all, 102 patients
presenting between January 2016 and July 2017 were eligible for inclusion
in the re-audit.Aims
Materials and Methods
