As tumours of bone and soft tissue are rare, multicentre prospective collaboration is essential for meaningful research and evidence-based advances in patient care. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators encountered in large-scale collaborative research by orthopaedic oncological surgeons involved or interested in prospective multicentre collaboration. All surgeons who were involved, or had expressed an interest, in the ongoing Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumour Surgery (PARITY) trial were invited to participate in a focus group to discuss their experiences with collaborative research in this area. The discussion was digitally recorded, transcribed and anonymised. The transcript was analysed qualitatively, using an analytic approach which aims to organise the data in the language of the participants with little theoretical interpretation.Objectives
Methods
As residency training programmes around the globe
move towards competency-based medical education (CBME), there is
a need to review current teaching and assessment practices as they
relate to education in orthopaedic trauma. Assessment is the cornerstone
of CBME, as it not only helps to determine when a trainee is fit
to practice independently, but it also provides feedback on performance
and guides the development of competence. Although a standardised
core knowledge base for trauma care has been developed by the leading
national accreditation bodies and international agencies that teach
and perform research in orthopaedic trauma, educators have not yet established
optimal methods for assessing trainees’ performance in managing
orthopaedic trauma patients. This review describes the existing knowledge from the literature
on assessment in orthopaedic trauma and highlights initiatives that
have recently been undertaken towards CBME in the United Kingdom,
Canada and the United States. In order to support a CBME approach, programmes need to improve
the frequency and quality of assessments and improve on current
formative and summative feedback techniques in order to enhance
resident education in orthopaedic trauma. Cite this article:
The diagnosis of surgical site infection following endoprosthetic reconstruction for bone tumours is frequently a subjective diagnosis. Large clinical trials use blinded Central Adjudication Committees (CACs) to minimise the variability and bias associated with assessing a clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to determine the level of inter-rater and intra-rater agreement in the diagnosis of surgical site infection in the context of a clinical trial. The Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumour Surgery (PARITY) trial CAC adjudicated 29 non-PARITY cases of lower extremity endoprosthetic reconstruction. The CAC members classified each case according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria for surgical site infection (superficial, deep, or organ space). Combinatorial analysis was used to calculate the smallest CAC panel size required to maximise agreement. A final meeting was held to establish a consensus.Objectives
Materials and Methods
Valid and reliable techniques for assessing performance
are essential to surgical education, especially with the emergence
of competency-based frameworks. Despite this, there is a paucity
of adequate tools for the evaluation of skills required during joint
replacement surgery. In this scoping review, we examine current
methods for assessing surgeons’ competency in joint replacement
procedures in both simulated and clinical environments. The ability
of many of the tools currently in use to make valid, reliable and
comprehensive assessments of performance is unclear. Furthermore,
many simulation-based assessments have been criticised for a lack
of transferability to the clinical setting. It is imperative that
more effective methods of assessment are developed and implemented
in order to improve our ability to evaluate the performance of skills
relating to total joint replacement. This will enable educators
to provide formative feedback to learners throughout the training
process to ensure that they have attained core competencies upon
completion of their training. This should help ensure positive patient
outcomes as the surgical trainees enter independent practice. Cite this article:
We investigated the clinical outcome of internal
fixation for pathological fracture of the femur after primary excision of
a soft-tissue sarcoma that had been treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. A review of our database identified 22 radiation-induced fractures
of the femur in 22 patients (seven men, 15 women). We noted the
mechanism of injury, fracture pattern and any complications after
internal fixation, including nonunion, hardware failure, secondary
fracture or deep infection. The mean age of the patients at primary excision of the tumour
was 58.3 years (39 to 86). The mean time from primary excision to
fracture was 73.2 months (2 to 195). The mean follow-up after fracture
fixation was 65.9 months (12 to 205). Complications occurred in
19 patients (86%). Nonunion developed in 18 patients (82%), of whom
11 had a radiological nonunion at 12 months, five a nonunion and
hardware failure and two an infected nonunion. One patient developed
a second radiation-associated fracture of the femur after internal
fixation and union of the initial fracture. A total of 13 patients
(59%) underwent 24 revision operations. Internal fixation of a pathological fracture of the femur after
radiotherapy for a soft-tissue sarcoma has an extremely high rate
of complication and requires specialist attention. Cite this article:
