The purpose of this study was to evaluate the
effect of various non-operative modalities of treatment (transcutaneous
electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); neuromuscular electrical stimulation
(NMES); insoles and bracing) on the pain of osteoarthritis (OA)
of the knee. We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify
the therapeutic options which are commonly adopted for the management
of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The outcome measurement tools used in the different studies were
the visual analogue scale and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
Arthritis Index pain index: all pain scores were converted to a
100-point scale. A total of 30 studies met our inclusion criteria: 13 on insoles,
seven on TENS, six on NMES, and four on bracing. The standardised
mean difference (SMD) in pain after treatment with TENS was 1.796,
which represented a significant reduction in pain. The significant
overall effect estimate for NMES on pain was similar to that of
TENS, with a SMD of 1.924. The overall effect estimate of insoles
on pain was a SMD of 0.992. The overall effect of bracing showed
a significant reduction in pain of 1.34. Overall, all four non-operative modalities of treatment were
found to have a significant effect on the reduction of pain in OA
of the knee. This study shows that non-operative physical modalities of treatment
are of benefit when treating OA of the knee. However, much of the
literature reviewed evaluates studies with follow-up of less than
six months: future work should aim to evaluate patients with longer
follow-up. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to assess the effect
of injecting genetically engineered chondrocytes expressing transforming
growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) into the knees of patients with osteoarthritis.
We assessed the resultant function, pain and quality of life. A total of 54 patients (20 men, 34 women) who had a mean age
of 58 years (50 to 66) were blinded and randomised (1:1) to receive
a single injection of the active treatment or a placebo. We assessed
post-treatment function, pain severity, physical function, quality
of life and the incidence of treatment-associated adverse events. Patients
were followed at four, 12 and 24 weeks after injection. At final follow-up the treatment group had a significantly greater
improvement in the mean International Knee Documentation Committee
score than the placebo group (16 points; -18 to 49, This technique may result in improved clinical outcomes, with
the aim of slowing the degenerative process, leading to improvements
in pain and function. However, imaging and direct observational
studies are needed to verify cartilage regeneration. Nevertheless,
this study provided a sufficient basis to proceed to further clinical testing. Cite this article:
