Our objective was describing an algorithm to identify and prevent vascular injury in patients with intrapelvic components. Patients were defined as at risk to vascular injuries when components or cement migrated 5 mm or more beyond the ilioischial line in any of the pelvic incidences (anteroposterior and Judet view). In those patients, a serial investigation was initiated by a CT angiography, followed by a vascular surgeon evaluation. The investigation proceeded if necessary. The main goal was to assure a safe tissue plane between the hardware and the vessels.Aims
Methods
In many papers, the diagnosis of pincer-type
femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is attributed to the presence
of coxa profunda. However, little is known about the prevalence
of coxa profunda in the general population and its clinical relevance. In order to ascertain its prevalence in asymptomatic subjects
and whether it is a reliable indicator of pincer-type FAI, we undertook
a cross-sectional study between July and December 2013. A total
of 226 subjects (452 hips) were initially screened. According to
strict inclusion criteria, 129 asymptomatic patients (257 hips)
were included in the study. The coxa profunda sign, the crossover
sign, the acetabular index (AI) and lateral centre–edge (LCE) angle were
measured on the radiographs. The median age of the patients was
36.5 years (28 to 50) and 138 (53.7%) were women. Coxa profunda was present in 199 hips (77.4%). There was a significantly
increased prevalence of coxa profunda in women (p <
0.05) and
a significant association between coxa profunda and female gender
(p <
0.001) (92% When the presence of all radiological signs in the same subject
was considered, pincer-type FAI was found in only two hips (one
subject). We therefore consider that the coxa profunda sign should
not be used as a radiological indicator of pincer-type FAI. We consider
profunda to be a benign alteration in the morphology of the hip
with low prevalence and a lack of association with other radiological
markers of FAI. We suggest that the diagnosis of pincer-type FAI
should be based on objective measures, in association with clinical
findings. Cite this article:
