Little is known about the relative outcomes of revision of unicompartmental
knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) to total
knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to compare the
outcomes of revision surgery for the two procedures in terms of
complications, re-revision and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
at a minimum of two years follow-up. This study was a retrospective review of data from an institutional
arthroplasty registry for cases performed between 2001 and 2014.
A total of 292 patients were identified, of which 217 had a revision
of HTO to TKA, and 75 had revision of UKA to TKA. While mean follow-up
was longer for the HTO group compared with the UKA group, patient
demographics (age, body mass index and Charlson co-morbidity index)
and PROMs (Short Form-36, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score,
both objective and functional) were similar in the two groups prior
to revision surgery. Outcomes included the rate of complications
and
re-operation, PROMS and patient-reported satisfaction at six months
and two years post-operatively. We also compared the duration of
surgery and the need for revision implants in the two groups. Aims
Patients and Methods
This study investigated the influence of body mass index (BMI)
on the post-operative fall in the level of haemoglobin (Hb), length
of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day re-admission rate, functional outcome
and quality of life, two years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 7733 patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA
between 2001 and 2010 were included. The mean age was 67 years (30
to 90). There were 1421 males and 6312 females. The patients were
categorised into three groups: BMI <
25.0 kg/m2 (normal);
BMI between 25.0 and 39.9 kg/m2 (obese); and BMI ≥ 40.0
kg/m2 (morbidly obese).Aims
Patients and Methods
We prospectively followed 171 patients who underwent
bilateral unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) over a period
of two years. Of these, 124 (72.5%) underwent a simultaneous bilateral
procedure and 47 (27.5%) underwent a staged procedure. The mean
cumulative operating time and length of hospital stay were both
shorter in the simultaneous group, by 22.5 minutes (p <
0.001)
and three days (p <
0.001), respectively. The mean reduction
in haemoglobin level post-operatively was greater by 0.15 g/dl in
the simultaneous group (p = 0.023), but this did not translate into
a significant increase in the number of patients requiring blood
transfusion (p = 1.000). The mean hospital cost was lower by $8892
in the simultaneous group (p <
0.001). There was no significant
difference in the rate of complications between the groups, and
at two-year follow-up there was no difference in the outcomes between
the two groups. We conclude that simultaneous bilateral UKR can be recommended
as an appropriate treatment for patients with bilateral medial compartment
osteoarthritis of the knee. Cite this article:
The success of total knee replacement (TKR) depends
on optimal soft-tissue balancing, among many other factors. The
objective of this study is to correlate post-operative anteroposterior
(AP) translation of a posterior cruciate ligament-retaining TKR
with clinical outcome at two years. In total 100 patients were divided
into three groups based on their AP translation as measured by the
KT-1000 arthrometer. Group 1 patients had AP translation <
5
mm, Group 2 had AP translation from 5 mm to 10 mm, and Group 3 had
AP translation >
10 mm. Outcome assessment included range of movement
of the knee, the presence of flexion contractures, hyperextension,
knee mechanical axes and functional outcome using the Knee Society
score, Oxford knee score and the Short-Form 36 questionnaire. At two years, patients in Group 2 reported significantly better
Oxford knee scores than the other groups (p = 0.045). A positive
correlation between range of movement and AP translation was noted,
with patients in group 3 having the greatest range of movement (mean
flexion: 117.9° (106° to 130°)) (p <
0.001). However, significantly
more patients in Group 3 developed hyperextension >
10° (p = 0.01). In this study, the best outcome for cruciate-ligament retaining
TKR was achieved in patients with an AP translation of 5 mm to 10
mm.
