The purpose of this study was to assess total knee arthroplasty (TKA) volume and rates of early complications in morbidly obese patients over the last decade, where the introduction of quality models influencing perioperative care pathways occurred. Patients undergoing TKA between 2011 to 2018 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were stratified by BMI < 40 kg/m2 and ≥ 40 kg/m2 and evaluated by the number of cases per year. The 30-day rates of any complication, wound complications, readmissions, and reoperation were assessed. Trends in these endpoints over the study period were compared between groups using odds ratios (ORs) and multivariate analyses.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in opioid use
after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), to identify predictors
of prolonged use and to compare the rates of opioid use after UKA,
total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). We identified 4205 patients who had undergone UKA between 2007
and 2015 from the Humana Inc. administrative claims database. Post-operative
opioid use for one year post-operatively was assessed using the
rates of monthly repeat prescription. These were then compared between
patients with and without a specific variable of interest and with
those of patients who had undergone TKA and THA.Aims
Materials and Methods
Lumbar fusion is known to reduce the variation in pelvic tilt
between standing and sitting. A flexible lumbo-pelvic unit increases
the stability of total hip arthroplasty (THA) when seated by increasing
anterior clearance and acetabular anteversion, thereby preventing
impingement of the prosthesis. Lumbar fusion may eliminate this protective
pelvic movement. The effect of lumbar fusion on the stability of
total hip arthroplasty has not previously been investigated. The Medicare database was searched for patients who had undergone
THA and spinal fusion between 2005 and 2012. PearlDiver software
was used to query the database by the International Classification
of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedural
code for primary THA and lumbar spinal fusion. Patients who had
undergone both lumbar fusion and THA were then divided into three
groups: 1 to 2 levels, 3 to 7 levels and 8+ levels of fusion. The
rate of dislocation in each group was established using ICD-9-CM codes.
Patients who underwent THA without spinal fusion were used as a
control group. Statistical significant difference between groups
was tested using the chi-squared test, and significance set at p
<
0.05.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the survivorship and radiographic
outcomes at ten-year follow-up of three prospective consecutive
series of patients each of which received a different design of
cementless femoral components for total hip arthroplasty (THA). In Cohort 1, 91 consecutive patients (100 hips) underwent THA
with a cementless porous-coated anatomic femoral stem (PCA) between
October 1983 and January 1986. In Cohort 2, 86 consecutive patients
(100 hips) underwent THA with an extensively porous-coated cementless
femoral stem (Prodigy) between June 1994 and October 1997. In Cohort
3, 88 consecutive patients (100 hips) underwent THA with a proximally
porous-coated triple-tapered cementless stem (Summit) between April
2002 and October 2003. All three groups underwent prospective clinical
and radiographic evaluation.Aims
Patients and Methods
A common situation presenting to the orthopaedic
surgeon today is a worn acetabular liner with substantial acetabular
and pelvic osteolysis. The surgeon has many options for dealing
with osteolytic defects. These include allograft, calcium based
substitutes, demineralised bone matrix, or combinations of these
options with or without addition of platelet rich plasma. To date
there are no clinical studies to determine the efficacy of using
bone-stimulating materials in osteolytic defects at the time of
revision surgery and there are surprisingly few studies demonstrating
the clinical efficacy of these treatment options. Even when radiographs
appear to demonstrate incorporation of graft material CT studies
have shown that incorporation is incomplete. The surgeon, in choosing
a graft material for a surgical procedure must take into account
the efficacy, safety, cost and convenience of that material. Cite this article:
Down’s syndrome is associated with a number of
musculoskeletal abnormalities, some of which predispose patients
to early symptomatic arthritis of the hip. The purpose of the present
study was to review the general and hip-specific factors potentially
compromising total hip replacement (THR) in patients with Down’s
syndrome, as well as to summarise both the surgical techniques that
may anticipate the potential adverse impact of these factors and
the clinical results reported to date. A search of the literature
was performed, and the findings further informed by the authors’
clinical experience, as well as that of the hip replacement in Down
Syndrome study group. The general factors identified include a high
incidence of ligamentous laxity, as well as associated muscle hypotonia
and gait abnormalities. Hip-specific factors include: a high incidence
of hip dysplasia, as well as a number of other acetabular, femoral
and combined femoroacetabular anatomical variations. Four studies
encompassing 42 hips, which reported the clinical outcomes of THR
in patients with Down’s syndrome, were identified. All patients
were successfully treated with standard acetabular and femoral components.
The use of supplementary acetabular screw fixation to enhance component
stability was frequently reported. The use of constrained liners
to treat intra-operative instability occurred in eight hips. Survival
rates of between 81% and 100% at a mean follow-up of 105 months
(6 to 292) are encouraging. Overall, while THR in patients with
Down’s syndrome does present some unique challenges, the overall
clinical results are good, providing these patients with reliable
pain relief and good function. Cite this article:
Options for the treatment of subcapital femoral
neck fractures basically fall into two categories: internal fixation
or arthroplasty (either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty).
Historically, the treatment option has been driven by a diagnosis-related approach
(non-displaced neck fractures versus displaced neck fractures).
More recently, the traditional paradigm has changed. Instead of
a diagnosis-related approach, it has become more of a patient-related
approach. Treatment options take in to consideration the patient’s age,
functional demands, and individual risk profile. A simple algorithm
can be helpful in terms of directing the treatment. Non-displaced
fractures, regardless of age of the patient, should be treated with
closed reduction and internal fixation. For displaced femoral neck fractures,
the treatment differs depending on the age of the patient. The younger
patient should be treated with urgent ORIF with the goal of an anatomic
reduction. For displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly,
cognitive function should be determined. For those who are cognitively
functioning, total hip arthroplasty appears to be the best option.
In the cognitively dysfunctional, a bipolar hemiarthroplasty or
a total hip arthroplasty with use of larger heads (32 mm or 36 mm)
and/or constrained sockets are a viable option.
We performed 83 consecutive cemented revision total hip arthroplasties in 77 patients between 1977 and 1983 using improved cementing techniques. One patient (two hips) was lost to follow-up. The remaining 76 patients (81 hips) had an average age at revision of 63.7 years (23 to 89). At the final follow-up 18 hips (22%) had had a reoperation, two (2.5%) for sepsis, three (4%) for dislocation and 13 (16%) for aseptic loosening. The incidence of rerevision for aseptic femoral loosening was 5.4% and for aseptic acetabular loosening 16%. These results confirm that cemented femoral revision is a durable option in revision hip surgery when improved cementing techniques are used, but that cemented acetabular revision is unsatisfactory.
