header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 72-B, Issue 4 | Pages 705 - 708
1 Jul 1990
Stockley I Betts R Rowley D Getty C Duckworth T

The relationship between hindfoot deformity and forefoot pressure was assessed in 28 rheumatoid patients who had undergone forefoot reconstruction four years previously. Patients with valgus hindfoot deformities tended to have high forefoot pressures whereas those with a normal hindfoot recorded normal pressures on the dynamic pedobarograph. All patients with residual forefoot pain recorded abnormal forefoot pressures. We believe that orthotic control of hindfoot deformities should be considered for those patients who require forefoot surgery as a combination of surgical and orthotic management may offer the best chance of success.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 67-B, Issue 3 | Pages 438 - 442
1 May 1985
Lang-Stevenson A Sharrard W Betts R Duckworth T

We report a prospective study of the causes and treatment of 26 long-standing neuropathic ulcers of the foot in 21 patients. The most important causal factor, well illustrated by pressure studies, was the presence of a dynamic or static deformity leading to local areas of peak pressure on insensitive skin. All but one of the 26 ulcers had healed after an average of 10 weeks of treatment in a light, skin-tight plaster cast, with the prohibition of weight-bearing. Recurrent ulceration was prevented in all but one foot by early operation to correct the causative deformity; this was performed after the ulcer had healed and before allowing weight-bearing on the limb. Pressure studies after operation confirmed that pressure points had been relieved.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 67-B, Issue 1 | Pages 79 - 85
1 Jan 1985
Duckworth T Boulton A Betts R Franks C Ward J

Static and dynamic measurements of foot pressure have been carried out on three groups of subjects: diabetic patients with neuropathy (with and without a history of ulceration), diabetic patients with no neuropathy, and normal subjects as controls. In many cases both techniques of measurement detected areas of abnormally high pressure under the foot, but in some cases a particularly high-pressure spot was detected on only one of the tests and sometimes both methods were needed to reveal all the areas of the foot which might be considered to be at risk. The dynamic measurements tended to show multiple areas of high pressure better than the static measurements. Our results indicate the importance of making both types of measurement when seeking to devise suitable means of protecting the foot from ulceration.