The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between reason for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and outcomes in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). We reviewed a prospective cohort of 647 patients undergoing full or partial rTHA at a single high-volume centre with a minimum of two years’ follow-up. The reasons for revision were classified as: infection; aseptic loosening; dislocation; structural failure; and painful THA for other reasons. PROMs (modified Oxford Hip Score (mOHS), EuroQol five-dimension three-level health questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) score, and visual analogue scales for pain during rest and activity), complication rates, and failure rates were compared among the groups.Aims
Methods
We designed a study to evaluate whether (1) there were differences in PROMs between different reasons for revision THA at baseline, (2) there was a different interaction effect for revision THA for all PROMs, and (3) complication and re-revision rates differ between reason for revision THA. Prospective cohort of 647 patients undergoing rTHA, with a minimum of 2 years FU. The reason for revision were classified as infection, aseptic loosening, dislocation, structural failure and painful THA with uncommon causes. PROMs (EQ-5D score, Oxford hip score (OHS), VAS pain, complication and failure rates were compared between different groups. Patients with different reason for revision had improvement of PROMs’ over time. Preoperatively, patients revised due to infection and aseptic loosening had poorer OHS and EQ-5D than patients with other reason for revision. Pain scores at baseline were highest in patients revised due to dislocation. Infection and aseptic loosening groups also showed a significant interaction effect over time in both OHS and EQ-5D. No PROMs significant differences between groups were observed 2 years postoperatively. Overall complications, and re-revision rates were 35.4 and 9.7% respectively. The reason for revision THA did not associate with clinical outcomes. Good outcomes were reached regardless of the reason for revision, as patients with the poorest pre-operative scores had the best improvement in PROMs over time. Complication and re-operation rates were relatively high, in line with previous reports, but did not differ between different reasons for revision THA.
A bicruciate retaining (BCR) TKA is thought to maintain a closer resemblance to the native knee kinematics compared to a posterior cruciate retaining (CR) TKA. With BCR TKAs retainment of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) facilitates proprioception and balance which is thought to lead to more natural knee kinematics and increased functional outcome. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the kinematics of a BCR and CR TKA during functional tests. In this patient-blinded randomized controlled trial, a total of 40 patients with knee osteoarthritis were included, 18 of them received a BCR TKA (Vanguard XP, Zimmer-Biomet) and 22 received a CR TKA (Vanguard CR, Zimmer-Biomet). Fluoroscopic analysis was done 1 year post-operatively. The main outcome was posterior femoral rollback (i.e. translation of the femorotibial contact point (CP)) of the BCR and CR TKA during a step-up test. Secondary, the kinematics during a lunge test were quantified as anterior-posterior (AP) translation of the femorotibial CP. Independent student t-tests (or non-parametric equivalent) were used to analyze the effect of BCR versus CR TKA on these measures, to correct for the multiple testing problem post-hoc Bonferroni-Holm corrections were applied.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Positive cultures are not uncommon in cases of revision total
knee and hip arthroplasty (TKA and THA) for presumed aseptic causes.
The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of positive
intra-operative cultures in presumed aseptic revision of TKA and
THA, and to determine whether the presence of intra-operative positive cultures
results in inferior survival in such cases. A retrospective cohort study was assembled with 679 patients
undergoing revision knee (340 cases) or hip arthroplasty (339 cases)
for presumed aseptic causes. For all patients three or more separate
intra-operative cultures were obtained. Patients were diagnosed
with a previously unsuspected prosthetic joint infection (PJI) if two
or more cultures were positive with the same organism. Records were
reviewed for demographic details, pre-operative laboratory results
and culture results. The primary outcome measure was infection-free
implant survival at two years.Aims
Patients and Methods
The number of revisions of total knee replacements (TKR) increases annually. Because of reduced bone stock, stable fixation of the implant is important. The femoral and tibial components are usually cemented whereas stems can be placed either cemented or press-fit (hybrid construct). To assess the stability of revision TKR with either cemented or hybrid places implants a randomized controlled trial (RCT) was executed, by using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The short-term results of this RCT showed no differences between the two groups in stability and clinical outcomes. Although there were no clinical or radiological signs of loosening, both groups showed implants micromotion > 1 mm or degree. These findings might indicate the possibility of loosening later in time; therefore, the current study investigated the stability of cemented versus hybrid-placed revision TKR 6.5 years after surgery. Additionally, clinical results were evaluated. Of the 32 patients in the original RCT, 23 (12 cement, 11 press-fit) were available for mid-term follow-up measures. RSA images taken at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively were used from the previous study. New RSA images were taken at median 6.5 years (range 5.4–7.3) postoperatively. Stability of the femoral and tibial implants was assessed by using model-based RSA software (RSAcore, Leiden, The Netherlands) to determine micromotion. Clinical results were evaluated using the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), active flexion, and VAS pain and satisfaction. Stability and clinical outcome were compared between the two groups using independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests when applicable.Introduction
Methods
Despite a preoperative workup with no evidence to suspect a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) before revision surgery, routinely obtained intraoperative cultures still can be unexpectedly positive. The purpose of this study was (1) to assess the incidence of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions and (2) to determine whether a difference exists between the infection-free implant survival rate of patients with and without unexpected positive intraoperative cultures. We selected patients who underwent a one-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) for different reasons. Three or more separate intraoperative cultures were obtained during each procedure. A negative result was defined as less than two positive cultures with the same microorganism. An unsuspected PJI was defined as having two or more positive cultures with the same microorganism. Patients’ medical records were reviewed to collect demographics, preoperative laboratory results, culture results, and the occurrence of infection during follow-up.Aim
Method
To improve implant positioning in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced as alternative for conventional instrumentation (CI). Though the PSI technique offers interesting opportunities in TKA, there is no consensus about the effectiveness of PSI in comparison with CI and results concerning soft-tissue balancing remain unclear. Therefore, the primary aim of the present study was to investigate the varus-valgus laxity in extension and flexion in patients receiving a TKA using PSI compared with CI. Additionally, radiological, clinical and functional outcomes were assessed. In this prospective randomization controlled trial, 42 patients with osteoarthritis received a Genesis II PS (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee), with either PSI (Visionaire, Smith & Nephew) or CI (Smith & Nephew). Patients visited the hospital preoperative and postoperative after 6 weeks, 3 and 12 months. One-year postoperative varus-valgus laxity was measured in extension and flexion on stress radiographs. Additional assessments included: the hip-knee-ankle angle on long-leg radiographs, femoral and tibia component rotation on CT-scans, radiolucency, the Knee Society Score (KSS), VAS pain, VAS Satisfaction, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS), Patella score (Kujala), the University of California Los Angeles activity score (UCLA), the anterior-posterior laxity in 20° and 90° knee flexion, adverse events and complications. The outcome measures were compared using independent t-tests, non-parametric alternatives and repeated measurements, with a significance level of p<0.05.Background
Methods
Both from experimental studies and the large arthroplasty registries there is evidence that bacteria are more often involved in implant loosening then is currently reported. To further elucidate this potential problem, the current study investigated the hypothesis that many total hip arthroplasty revisions, classified as aseptic, are in fact low-grade infections missed with routine diagnostics. In 7 Dutch hospitals, 176 patients with the preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening of their total hip arthroplasty were enrolled. From each patient, the preoperative history was obtained. During surgery, between 14 and 20 tissue samples were obtained for routine culture, pathology analysis and broad range 16S rRNA PCR with reverse line blot hybridization (PCR-RLB). Samples were taken from the (neo-) capsule and acetabular and femoral interface tissue. Cultures were performed locally according to similar protocols. One specialized pathologist, blinded for all other results, analyzed all pathology samples. The PCR-RLB analysis was performed centrally, using a technique previously validated for orthopedic use. Patients were classified as not infected, suspect for infection or infected, according to strict, predefined criteria. Each patient had a follow-up visit after 1 year.Background
Methods
An important factor in the functional results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the achieved maximal flexion. To date, a TKA still provides dissimilar flexion capabilities compared to the healthy knee, which could be due to the mismatch between the normal knee geometry and the implant geometry. The implant design of the Journey (Smith&Nephew) aims to replicate the normal knee function. According to the manufacturer of the Journey system, it intends to replicate PCL and ACL function, accommodates deep flexion, induces normal tibiofemoral axial rotation and provides proper patellar tracking throughout the entire range of flexion (‘guided motion’). The objective of this study is to investigate the maximal knee flexion one year after surgery of the Journey and its predecessor the Genesis II (Smith&Nephew). In addition, clinical and functional outcomes will be evaluated. A total of 124 patients presenting with noninflammatory osteoarthritis received the Journey or the Genesis II prosthesis, by randomization. The primary outcome was defined as the maximum flexion angle on a lateral X-ray performed with the patient lying on a bench and using manual force on bending the knee. Secondary outcomes were: active flexion (lying and standing), Knee Society System score (KSS), Patella Scoring System (PSS), number of adverse events (AE) and satisfaction. The changes in KSS and PSS between the pre-operative situation and 1 year after surgery were calculated as: δKSS = KSS1 year – KSSpre-op, and δPSS = PSS1 year – PSSpre-op. Two-sided t-tests and non-parametric alternatives were performed in order to test for differences between the Journey and the Genesis II group.Introduction
Methods
