Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral component represents a widely practised technique for a variety of indications in revision total hip arthroplasty. In this study, we compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two polished tapered femoral components. From our prospectively collated database, we identified all patients undergoing cement-in-cement revision from January 2005 to January 2013 who had a minimum of two years' follow-up. All cases were performed by the senior author using either an Exeter short revision stem or the C-Stem AMT high offset No. 1 prosthesis. Patients were followed-up annually with clinical and radiological assessment.Aims
Methods
Noise generation has been reported with ceramic-on-ceramic
articulations in total hip replacement (THR). This study evaluated
208 consecutive Delta Motion THRs at a mean follow-up of 21 months
(12 to 35). There were 141 women and 67 men with a mean age of 59
years (22 to 84). Patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically,
and the incidence of noise was determined using a newly described
assessment method. Noise production was examined against range of
movement, ligamentous laxity, patient-reported outcome scores, activity
level and orientation of the acetabular component. There were 143
silent hips (69%), 22 (11%) with noises other than squeaking, 17
(8%) with unreproducible squeaking and 26 (13%) with reproducible
squeaking. Hips with reproducible squeaking had a greater mean range
of movement (p <
0.001) and mean ligament laxity (p = 0.004), smaller
median head size (p = 0.01) and decreased mean acetabular component
inclination (p = 0.02) and anteversion angle (p = 0.02) compared
with the other groups. There was no relationship between squeaking
and age (p = 0.13), height (p = 0.263), weight (p = 0.333), body
mass index (p = 0.643), gender (p = 0.07) or patient outcome score
(p = 0.422). There were no revisions during follow-up. Despite the
surprisingly high incidence of squeaking, all patients remain satisfied
with their hip replacement. Cite this article:
We describe the experience with the first consecutive 230 Birmingham hip resurfacings at our centre. At a mean follow-up of three years (25 to 52 months) survivorship was 99.14% with revision in one patient for a loose acetabular component and one death from unrelated causes. One patient developed a fracture of the femoral neck at six weeks which united unremarkably after a period of non-weight-bearing. The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 62.54 (8 to 92) to 97.74 (61 to 100). The mean flexion improved from 91.52° (25 to 140) to 110.41° (80 to 145). Most patients (97%) considered the outcome to be good or excellent. Our preliminary experience with this implant is encouraging and the results are superior to the earlier generation of resurfacings for the same length of follow-up.
