The purpose of this study was to compare two different types
of metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing for total hip arthroplasty (THA):
one with a large femoral head (38 mm to 52 mm) and the other with
a conventional femoral head (28 mm or 32 mm). We compared clinical
outcome, blood metal ion levels, and the incidence of pseudotumour in
the two groups. Between December 2009 and December 2011, 62 patients underwent
MoM THA with a large femoral head (Magnum group) and 57 patients
an MoM THA with a conventional femoral head (conventional group).
Clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip score, University
of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score and EuroQol-5D
(EQ-5D). Blood metal ion levels were measured and MRI scans were
analyzed at a minimum of five years postoperatively.Aims
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 40 hips in 36 patients who had undergone acetabular reconstruction using a titanium Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allografts between May 2001 and April 2006. Impacted bone allografts were used for the management of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Type II defects in 17 hips, and bulk bone allografts together with impacted allografts were used for the management of Type III defects in 23 hips. A total of five hips showed radiological failure at a mean follow-up of 6.7 years (4.5 to 9.3), two of which were infected. The mean pre-operative Merle d’Aubigné score was 10 (5 to 15) This clinical study indicates that revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allografts yielded satisfactory mid-term results.
