We undertook a randomised controlled trial to compare the outcomes of skin adhesive and staples for skin closure in total hip replacement. The primary outcome was the cosmetic appearance of the scar at three months using a surgeon-rated visual analogue scale. In all, 90 patients were randomised to skin closure using either skin adhesive (n = 45) or staples (n = 45). Data on demographics, surgical details, infection and oozing were collected during the in-patient stay. Further data on complications, patient satisfaction and evaluation of cosmesis were collected at three-month follow-up, and a photograph of the scar was taken. An orthopaedic and a plastic surgeon independently evaluated the cosmetic appearance of the scars from the photographs. No significant difference was found between groups in the cosmetic appearance of scars at three months (p = 0.172), the occurrence of complications (p = 0.3), or patient satisfaction (p = 0.42). Staples were quicker and easier to use than skin adhesive and also less expensive. Skin adhesive and surgical staples are both effective skin closure methods in total hip replacement.

Introduction: Chronic joint pain is the primary reason for individuals electing to undergo TKR and therefore pain relief is an extremely important outcome after surgery. Although the literature suggests that TKR produces excellent pain relief, the prevalence of chronic pain after TKR is often masked in the reporting of mean pain scores. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence, impact and onset of pain at 1-year after TKR.

Methods: 243 patients (251 knees) were recruited into a multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing the outcomes of the Kinemax Plus fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing implant. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and then 3 months, 1-year and 2-years post-operatively. At each assessment time patients completed the WOMAC, KOOS quality of life scale, SF-12, American Knee Society Score, Satisfaction Scale for Joint Replacement Arthroplasty and a clinical examination. As part of the clinical assessment patients were asked to rate the pain in their knee as none, mild, occasionally moderate, continually moderate or severe.

Results: To date, 240 knees have reached their 1-year follow-up. Complete data regarding pain ratings was available for 198 patients. The mean age of patients was 68 years (range 40–81) and 52% were male. At 1-year after TKR, 13% of patients had occasionally moderate pain, 6% had continually moderate pain and 6% of patients had severe pain. In total, 25% patients reported moderate-severe pain at 1-year after TKR. 60% patients with pain at 1-year post-operative also experienced moderate-severe pain at 3 months post-operative. Using a Mann-Whitney U test, patients with moderate-severe pain at 1-year after TKR had significantly worse physical function (p< 0.001), knee-related quality of life (p< 0.001) and mental health scores (p< 0.05) than those patients with no-mild pain.

Conclusion: This study suggests the prevalence of pain after TKR is high, with 25% of patients reporting moderate-severe pain at 1-year after TKR. Pain experienced at 1-year post-operative was most frequently preceded by pain at 3-months post-operative, suggesting that for many patients a pain-free period after surgery is not experienced. The pain present at 1-year after TKR affected several domains of life, including functional ability, quality of life and mental health. Future research will focus on developing a pre-operative screening protocol to identify patients at risk of chronic pain after TKR.

This research was supported by funding from Stryker UK.

We compared patient-reported outcomes of the Kinemax fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacement in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to the fixed- or the mobile-bearing prosthesis via a sealed envelope method after the bone cuts had been made in the operating theatre. Randomisation was stratified by centre and diagnosis. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at eight to 12 weeks, one year and two years post-operatively. Validated questionnaires were used which included the Western Ontario MacMasters University, Short-Form 12, Mental Health Index-5, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Knee-Related Quality of Life and Function in Sport and Recreation scales and a validated scale of satisfaction post-operatively. In total, 242 patients (250 knees) with a mean age of 68 years (40 to 80) were recruited from four NHS orthopaedic centres. Of these, 132 patients (54.5%) were women.

No statistically significant differences could be identified in any of the patient-reported outcome scores between patients who received the fixed-bearing or the mobile-bearing knee up to two-years post-operatively.

Our aim was to determine the pre-operative sporting profiles of patients undergoing primary joint replacement and to establish if they were able to return to sport after surgery. A postal survey was completed by 2085 patients between one and three years after operation. They had undergone one of five operations, namely total hip replacement, hip resurfacing, total knee replacement, unicompartmental knee replacement or patellar resurfacing. In the three years before operation 726 (34.8%) patients were participating in sport, the most common being swimming, walking and golf. A total of 446 (61.4%) had returned to their sporting activities by one to three years after operation and 192 (26.4%) were unable to do so because of their joint replacement, with the most common reason being pain. The largest decline was in high-impact sports including badminton, tennis and dancing. After controlling for the influence of age and gender, there was no significant difference in the rate of return to sport according to the type of operation.

Thromboprophylaxis after elective orthopaedic surgery remains controversial. Recent guidelines from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) have suggested that low molecular weight heparin should be given to all patients undergoing total hip replacement. The British Orthopaedic Association is currently debating this guideline with NICE, as it is not clear whether published evidence supports this view. We present the early mortality in our unit after total hip replacement using aspirin as chemical thromboprophylaxis. The 30-day and 90-day mortality after primary total hip arthroplasty was zero. We compare this with that reported previously from our unit without using chemical thromboprophylaxis. With the introduction of routine aspirin thromboprophylaxis, deaths from cardiovascular causes have dropped from 0.75% to zero.

These results demonstrate that there is a strong argument for the routine administration of aspirin after elective total hip replacement.

The static properties of bone cements have been widely reported in the literature (Lewis, 1997, Khun, 2000, Armstrong 2002). Commercial bone cements are expected to perform above the minimum values in static tests specified by ISO 5833: 2002. It has been suggested that the viscoelastic properties of bone cement, such as creep and stress relaxation, might bear more relevance to the in-vivo behaviour of the cement-implant construct (Lee 2002). This study aimed to compare numerous properties of Simplex P, Simplex Antibiotic and Simplex Tobramycin and identify those properties most sensitive to subtle changes in cement composition. The three cements were chosen on the basis that they are characterised by the same liquid and powder compositions, the only difference being represented by the type and amount of added antibiotics. In Simplex Antibiotic the additives are 0.5g Erythromycin and 3 million I.U. Colistin, while in Antibiotic Simplex with Tobramycin the only additive is 0.5g of Tobramycin. The static properties of the cements were assessed following protocols described in ISO 5833: 2002, while the viscoelastic properties of the cement were measured with in-house developed apparatus in quasi-static conditions. Creep and stress relaxation tests were performed in four point bending configuration. Porosity was measured on the mid cross section of the creep samples using a digital image technique. All cements exhibited properties compatible with the ISO standard, but in plain Simplex the ISO minimum for bending and compressive strength was within the variation of the batches tested. Bending strength measurements were the least sensitive to differences in the cements. Plain Simplex displayed lower bending and compressive strength but higher bending modulus than the antibiotic laden options. The bending modulus could only discriminate between Simplex P and Simplex Antibiotic (p=0.02). Differences in the compressive strength of the three cements were significant, with the plain option being the weakest. Stress relaxation only discriminated between plain and Tobramycin loaded cement (p=0.028), while creep was more sensitive to differences and allowed distinction between plain and antibiotic loaded bone cements. The creep behaviour correlated with the cross sectional porosity measurements. This study demonstrated that the static tests specified by the current international standard are not as sensitive to subtle changes in the composition of the material as the time temperature dependent parameters characteristic of creep and stress relaxation. The authors advocate the evaluation of time and temperature dependent characteristics as a complement to the current standard.