Despite the increase in the surgical repair of proximal hamstring tears, there exists a lack of consensus in the optimal timing for surgery. There is also disagreement on how partial tears managed surgically compare with complete tears repaired surgically. This study aims to compare the mid-term functional outcomes in, and operating time required for, complete and partial proximal hamstring avulsions, that are repaired both acutely and chronically. This is a prospective series of 156 proximal hamstring surgical repairs, with a mean age of 48.9 years (21.5 to 78). Functional outcomes were assessed preinjury, preoperatively, and postoperatively (six months and minimum three years) using the Sydney Hamstring Origin Rupture Evaluation (SHORE) score. Operating time was recorded for every patient.Aims
Methods
To determine the outcome after the Semi-tendinosis tendon was used in reconstruction of the Medial Patella-femoral ligament using a fixed dynamic stabilising structure. The Adductor Magnus tendon insertion at the Adductor tubercle of the medial femoral condyle was used as a dynamic and fixed stabilising point preventing patella subluxation. This is a constant landmark in most patients and eliminates the need to find the isometric stabilisation point of the Medial Patella-femoral ligament. The Semi-tendinosus tendon was routed from its distal tibia attachment through a drill hole in the patella from distal to proximal. It was then transferred sub-vastus around the Adductor Magnus femoral attachment and sutured back onto itself at the inferior patella pole. It was tensioned at 30 degrees of knee flexion. Between 2004 and 2011 forty knees were reconstructed using the Semi-tendinosus tendon combined with an extra-synovial lateral release. All had failed conservative therapy for repeated patella instability. Post-operatively the patients followed a strict rehabilitation protocol. At follow-up the patients were questioned for any symptoms of patella instability or dislocation. Any complications of the surgery were documented. Patients were examined for any signs of patella apprehension or abnormal patella tracking.Purpose of the study
Method
There is ongoing debate on the benefits of fixed versus mobile bearing Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR). We report the results from a randomised controlled trial comparing fixed and mobile bearing of the same UKR prosthesis. Forty patients were randomized to receive identical femoral components and either a fixed or mobile bearing tibial component. At 6.5 years follow-up 37% of the mobile bearing design had been revised and 14% for the fixed bearing design. The main reasons for revision were pain and loosening. These results were compared with data from The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) that show a cumulative percent revision of 24.2% for the mobile bearing Preservation UKR at 6.5 years. All locally explanted mobile bearings were examined microscopically, and 83% demonstrated significant backside wear. Constraint on the undersurface of the bearing coupled with a congruent upper surface may have contributed to the excessive revision rate. This is the first randomised controlled trial examining mobile and fixed variations of the same UKR prosthesis and shows this design of UKR with the mobile bearing has an unacceptably high revision rate and patients with this knee design should be closely monitored.
The aim of this study was to compare a single-incision minimally invasive (MI) posterior approach with a standard posterior approach in a double-blind prospective randomised controlled trial. A pilot study was carried out to assess the efficacy of the MI approach. Primary total hip replacements meeting the inclusion criteria were randomised to either the MI approach or the standard posterior approach. Patients were blinded to allocation. Patients were scored by a blinded physiotherapist pre-operatively, at Day 2, 2 weeks and 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was function, assessed using the Oxford hip score, SF-12 questionnaire, Iowa score, 6-minute walk test and the number of walking aids required after 2 and 6 weeks post-operatively. Secondary outcomes were complication rates, patient satisfaction, soft tissue trauma and radiographic analysis.Aim
Method
