Aims

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether acetabular retroversion (AR) represents a structural anatomical abnormality of the pelvis or is a functional phenomenon of pelvic positioning in the sagittal plane, and to what extent the changes that result from patient-specific functional position affect the extent of AR.

Acetabular retroversion (ARV) is a cause of femoroacetabular impingement leading to hip pain and reduced range of motion. We aimed to describe the radiological criteria used for diagnosing ARV in the literature and report on the outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and hip arthroscopy (HA) in its management.

A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted on the MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, COCHRANE database in December 2022. English-language studies reporting outcomes of PAO, or open or arthroscopic interventions for ARV were included.

From an initial 4203 studies, 21 non-randomised studies met the inclusion criteria.

Eleven studies evaluated HA for ARV, with average follow-up ranging from 1 to 5 years, for a cumulative number of 996 patients. Only 3/11 studies identified ARV using AP standardized pelvic radiographs. The most frequent signs describing ARV identified were: Ischial Spine Sign (98% of patients), Posterior Wall Sign (PWS, 94%) and Crossover Sign (COS, 64%); with mean Acetabular Retroversion Index (ARI) ranging from 33% to 35%. 39% of HA patients had all three radiographic signs. Clinically significant outcomes were reached by 33–78% of patients.

Eight studies evaluated PAO for ARV, with a follow-up ranging from 2 to 10 years, for a cumulative number of 379 patients. Five of the eight studies identified ARV using standardized radiographs. ISS, COS and PWS were positive in 54%, 97% and 81% of patients, respectively with 52% of PAO patients having all three radiographic signs. Mean ARI ranged from 36–41%. Clinically significant results were reported in 71%–78% of patients.

The diagnostic criteria for ARV is poorly defined in the literature, and the quality of evidence is low. Studies on HA are more likely to have used lenient diagnostic criteria. It remains difficult to recommend which cases maybe more suitable for treatment by HA rather than PAO.

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established treatment for developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) in young adults and can also be utilised in the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with acetabular retroversion. This study used a national registry to assess the outcomes of PAO for DDH and FAI.

PAOs recorded in the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry between 2012 and November 2022 were identified along with recorded patient and surgical characteristics. Cases were grouped according to the primary pathology (DDH or FAI). Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) captured included the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT)-12 (primary outcome) and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) index preoperatively and at 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years post-operatively.

1,087 PAOs were identified; 995 for DDH (91%), 98 for FAI (9%). Most patients (91%) were female. The DDH group were significantly older (mean 31.7 years) than the FAI group (25.4 years) but had similar body mass index (mean 25.7kg/m2). Overall, significant (all p<0.0001) iHOT-12 and EQ-5D improvement (delta) vs baseline pre-operative scores were achieved at 6 months (mean iHOT-12 improvement +27.4 (95%CI 25.3 to 29.5); n=515) and maintained out to 5 years (+30.0 (21.4 to 38.6); n=44 [9.8% of those eligible for follow-up at 5 years]), at which point 71% and 55% of patients continued to demonstrate a score improvement greater than or equal to the minimum clinically important difference (≥13 points) and substantial clinical benefit (≥28 points) for iHOT-12 respectively.

This study demonstrates excellent functional outcomes following PAO undertaken for DDH and FAI in the short to medium term in a large national registry.

Acetabular retroversion is a recognised cause of hip impingement. Pelvic tilt influences acetabular orientation and is known to change in different functional positions. While previously reported in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, positional changes in pelvic tilt have not been studied in patients with acetabular retroversion.

We retrospectively analysed supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs in 22 patients with preoperative radiographs and 47 with post-operative radiographs treated for symptomatic acetabular retroversion. Measurements were made for acetabular index (AI), lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), crossover index, ischial spine sign, and posterior wall sign. The change in pelvic tilt angle was measured both by the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic (SFP) angle and the Pubic Symphysis to Sacro-iliac (PS-SI) Index.

In the supine position, the mean calculated pelvic tilt angle (by SFP) was 1.05° which changed on standing to a pelvic tilt of 8.64°. A significant increase in posterior pelvic tilt angle from supine to standing of 7.59° (SFP angle) and 5.89° (PS –SI index) was calculated (p<0.001;paired t-test). There was a good correlation in pelvic tilt change between measurements using SFP angle and PS-SI index (rho .901 in pre-op group, rho .815 in post-op group). Signs of retroversion were significantly reduced in standing x-rays compared to supine: Crossover index (0.16 vs 0.38; p<0.001) crossover sign (19/28 vs 28/28 hips; p<0.001), ischial spine sign (10/28 hips vs 26/28 hips; p<0.001) and posterior wall sign (12/28 vs 24/28 hips; p<0.001).

Posterior pelvic tilt increased from supine to standing in patients with symptomatic acetabular retroversion, in keeping with previous studies of pelvic tilt change in patients with hip dysplasia. The features of acetabular retroversion were much less evident on standing radiographs. The low pelvic tilt angle in the supine position is implicated in the appearance of acetabular retroversion in the supine position. Patients presenting with symptoms of hip impingement should be assessed by supine and standing pelvic radiographs so as not to miss signs of retroversion and to assist with optimising acetabular correction at the time of surgery.

Aims

The lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) is a plain radiological measure of superolateral cover of the femoral head. This study aims to establish the correlation between 2D radiological and 3D CT measurements of acetabular morphology, and to describe the relationship between LCEA and femoral head cover (FHC).

Acetabular retroversion is a recognised cause of hip impingement. Pelvic tilt influences acetabular orientation and is known to change in different functional positions. While previously reported in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, positional changes in pelvic tilt have not been studied in patients with acetabular retroversion.

We retrospectively analysed supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs in 22 patients with preoperative radiographs and 47 with post-operative radiographs treated for symptomatic acetabular retroversion. Measurements were made for acetabular index (AI), lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), crossover index, ischial spine sign, and posterior wall sign. The change in pelvic tilt angle was measured both by the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic (SFP) angle and the Pubic Symphysis to Sacro-iliac (PS-SI) Index.

In the supine position, the mean calculated pelvic tilt angle (by SFP) was 1.05° which changed on standing to a pelvic tilt of 8.64°. A significant increase in posterior pelvic tilt angle from supine to standing of 7.59° (SFP angle) and 5.89° (PS –SI index) was calculated (p<0.001;paired t-test). The mean pelvic tilt change of 6.51° measured on post-operative Xrays was not significantly different (p=.650). There was a good correlation in pelvic tilt change between measurements using SFP angle and PS-SI index (rho .901 in pre-op group, rho .815 in post-op group). Signs of retroversion were significantly reduced in standing x-rays compared to supine: Crossover index (0.16 vs 0.38; p<0.001) crossover sign (19/28 vs 28/28 hips; p<0.001), ischial spine sign (10/28 hips vs 26/28 hips; p<0.001) and posterior wall sign (12/28 vs 24/28 hips; p<0.001).

Posterior pelvic tilt increased from supine to standing in patients with symptomatic acetabular retroversion, in keeping with previous studies of pelvic tilt change in patients with hip dysplasia. The features of acetabular retroversion were much less evident on standing radiographs. The low pelvic tilt angle in the supine position is implicated in the appearance of acetabular retroversion in the supine position. Patients presenting with symptoms of hip impingement should be assessed by supine and standing pelvic radiographs so as not to miss signs of retroversion and to assist with optimising acetabular correction at the time of surgery.

Pelvic re-orientation osteotomy is a well-recognised treatment of young adults with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

The most commonly used technique is the periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), however, some surgeons favour a triple osteotomy. These techniques can also be utilised for acetabular retroversion leading to FAI.

Despite the published literature on these techniques, the authors note a scarcity of evidence looking at patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for these procedures.

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data utilising the UK NAHR. All patients who underwent pelvic osteotomy from January 2012 to November 2019 were identified from the NAHR database. Patients who consented to data collection received EQ-5D index and iHOT-12 questionnaires, with scores being collected pre-operatively and at 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively.

Nine hundred and eleven (911) patients were identified with twenty-seven (27) undergoing a triple osteotomy, the remaining patients underwent PAO. Mean age was 30.6 (15–56) years and 90% of patients were female. Seventy-nine (79) (8.7%) of patients had the procedure for acetabular retroversion leading to FAI

Statistical analysis, of all patients, showed significant improvement (p<0.001) for; iHOT-12 scores (+28 at 6-months, +33.8 at 12-months and +29.9 at 24-months)

Similarly there was significant improvement (p<0.001) in EQ-5D index (+0.172 at 6-months, +0.187 at 12-months and +0.166 at 24-months)

Pre-operatively, and at each follow-up time-period, raw scores were significantly better in the DDH group compared to the FAI group (p<0.05); however, the improvement in scores was similar for both groups.

For both scoring measures, univariable and multivariable linear regression showed poorer pre-operative scores to be strongly significant predictors of greater post-operative improvement at 6 and 12 months (p<0.0001).

Purpose

Spinopelvic parameters are associated with the development of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement and subsequent osteoarthritis. Pelvic incidence (PI) characterizes the sagittal profile of the pelvis and is important in the regulation of both lumbar lordosis and pelvic orientation (i.e. tilt). The purpose of this imaging-based study was to test the association between PI and acetabular morphology.

Acetabular dysplasia (AD) can cause hip pain and early osteoarthritis. Lateral Centre Edge Angle (LCEA) and sourcil angle (AI) are plain radiographic measures of acetabular morphology, however there is little agreement as to what constitutes mild, moderate or severe dysplasia. This study aims to establish the correlation, if any, between two-dimensional (XR) and three-dimensional (CT) measurements of acetabular morphology and to establish the level of femoral head cover (CTFHC) for different levels of dysplasia.

Introduction

Acetabular dysplasia is typically characterised by insufficient antero-superior femoral head coverage. It is postulated (yet unproven) that patients with dysplasia compensate by reducing pelvic tilt (anterior pelvic rotation), effectively retroverting their acetabulum to improve antero-superior cover. We aimed to 1) define pelvic tilt (PT) in patients with bilateral and unilateral dysplasia, and 2) quantify PT changes following a successful periacetabular osteotomy (PAO).

Introduction

The periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) improves hip joint mechanics in patients with symptomatic dysplasia. As a consequence of the multi-planar acetabular re-orientation, the course of the iliopsoas tendon over the hip may be affected, potentially resulting in iliopsoas tendon-related pain. At present, little information regarding the incidence of iliopsoas-related pathology following PAO exists.

We aimed to identify the incidence of iliopsoas-related pain following PAO. Secondarily, we aimed to identify any risk factors associated with this pathology.

Introduction

Peri-acetabular-osteotomy (PAO) was initially described for the correction of acetabular dysplasia. Anteverting PAO is an established treatment for acetabular retroversion. By reviewing a large cohort, we aimed to (1) Test whether PAO outcome is equivalent in different types of deformity (classic dysplasia vs. retroversion) and (2) Determine whether outcome in acetabular retroversion is different between impinging-only hip and hips with combined pathology (impingement & dysplasia).

Introduction

Acetabular retroversion (AR) can cause pain and early osteoarthritis. The sagittal pelvic position or pelvic tilt (PT)has a direct relationship with acetabular orientation. As the pelvis tilts anteriorly, PT reduces and AR increases. Therefore, AR may be a deformity secondary to abnormal PT (functional retroversion) or an anatomical deformity of the acetabulum and/or pelvic ring.

This study aims to:

Define PT at presentation is in AR patients and whether this is different to controls (volunteers without pain).

The purpose of this study was to determine the complications after Bernese periacetabular osteomy (PAO) performed by one experienced surgeon using a minimally invasive modified Smith-Petersen approach.

Between May 2012 and December 2015, 224 periacetabular osteotomies (PAO) in 201 patients were performed. The perioperative complications were retrospectively reviewed after reviewing clinical notes and radiographs. The mean age was 28.8 years with 179 females and 22 males. The most common diagnosis was acetabular dysplasia with some cases of retroversion. The average lateral centre edge (LCE) angle was 16.5°(−18–45) and mean acetabular index (AI) 16.79° (−3–50).

Postoperatively the mean LCE angle was 33.1°(20–51.3) and mean AI 3.0°

(−13.5–16.6). There were no deep infections, no major nerve or vascular injuries and only one allogenic blood transfusion.

Nine superficial wound infections required oral antibiotics and two wounds needed a surgical debridement. There was one pulmonary embolus and one deep vein thrombosis. Nine (4%) cases underwent a subsequent hip arthroscopy and three (1.3%) PAO's were converted to a total hip arthroplasty after a mean follow-up of 22 months (3–50).

Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve dysaesthesia was noted in 64 (28.6%) PAO's. In 55 (24.5%) an iliopsoas injection of local anaesthetic and steroid for persistent iliopsoas irritation during the recovery phase was given.

The minimally invasive modified Smith-Petersen approach is suitable to perform a Bernese periacetabular osteotomy with a low perioperative complication rate. Persistent pain related to iliopsoas is a not uncommon finding and perhaps under-reported in the literature.

Clinical graphics allows creation of three dimensional simulation based on CT or MRI that allows pre-operative planning. The software reports several hip morphological parameters routinely. Our aim was to validate the measurements of acetabular morphological parameters using CT based clinical graphics in patients presenting with symptomatic hip pain.

We reviewed standardised plain radiographs, CT scans and 3D clinical graphics outputs of 42 consecutive hips in 40 patients presenting with symptomatic hip pain. Acetabular index (AI), lateral centre edge angle (LCE), acetabular and femoral version measurements were analysed for the 3D clinical graphics with radiographs and CT as gold standard.

Significant differences were noted in measurements of AI, LCE, acetabular version and femoral version using the 3D motion analysis versus conventional measures, with only acetabular version showing comparable measurements. Correlation between 3D clinical graphics and conventional measures of acetabular morphology (AI, LCE) showed only slight agreement (ICC <0.4); while substantial agreement was noted for acetabular and femoral version (IC > 0.5).

Acetabular morphological parameters measured by 3D clinical graphics are not reliable or validated. While clinicians may pursue the use of 3D clinical graphics for preoperative non-invasive planning, caution should be exercised when interpreting the reports of hip morphological parameters such as AI and LCE.

Introduction

Periacetabular osteotomy has been described as an effective way of treating symptomatic hip dysplasia. We describe a new minimally invasive technique using a modification of the Smith Peterson approach.

The cam-type deformity in femoroacetabular impingement is a 3D deformity. Single measurements using radiographs, CT or MRI may not provide a true estimate of the magnitude of the deformity. We performed an analysis of the size and location of measurements of the alpha angle (α°) using a CT technique which could be applied to the 3D reconstructions of the hip. Analysis was undertaken in 42 patients (57 hips; 24 men and 18 women; mean age 38 years (16 to 58)) who had symptoms of femoroacetabular impingement related to a cam-type abnormality. An α° of > 50° was considered a significant indicator of cam-type impingement. Measurements of the α° were made at different points around the femoral head/neck junction at intervals of 30°: starting at the nine o’clock (posterior), ten, eleven and twelve o’clock (superior), one, two and ending at three o’clock (anterior) position.

The mean maximum increased α° was 64.6° (50.8° to 86°). The two o’clock position was the most common point to find an increased α° (53 hips; 93%), followed by one o’clock (48 hips; 84%). The largest α° for each hip was found most frequently at the two o’clock position (46%), followed by the one o’clock position (39%). Generally, raised α angles extend over three segments of the clock face.

Single measurements of the α°, whether pre- or post-operative, should be viewed with caution as they may not be representative of the true size of the deformity and not define whether adequate correction has been achieved following surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1167–71.

The position of the pelvis has been shown to influence acetabular orientation. However there have been no studies quantifying that effect on the native acetabulum. Our aims were to investigate whether it is possible to quantify the relationship between pelvic tilt and acetabular orientation in native hips, and whether pelvic tilt affects acetabular cover of the femoral head.

Computerized tomography scans of 93 hips (36 normal, 31 dysplastic and 26 with acetabular retroversion) were analyzed. We used a CT technique that allows standardised three-dimensional (3D) analysis of acetabular inclination and anteversion and calculation of femoral head cover in relation to the anterior pelvic plane and at different degrees of forward and backward tilt. Acetabular anteversion, inclination and cover of the femoral head were measured at pelvic tilt angles ranging from −20° to 20° in relation to the anterior pelvic plane using 5° increments.

The effect of pelvic tilt on version was similar in the normal, dysplastic and retroverted groups, with a drop in anteversion ranging from 2.5° to 5° for every 5° of forward tilt. The effect on inclination was less marked and varied among the three groups. Pelvic tilt increased femoral head cover in both normal and dysplastic hips. The effect was less marked, and tended to be negligible at higher positive tilt angles, in the retroverted group.

This study has provided benchmark data on how pelvic tilt affects various acetabular parameters which in turn may be helpful in promoting greater understanding of acetabular abnormalities and how pelvic tilt affects the interpretation of pelvic radiographs.

The position of the pelvis influences acetabular orientation. In particular, pelvic tilt in the sagittal plane may lead to inaccurate interpretation of plain pelvic radiographs. We therefore quantified the relationship between this pelvic tilt and acetabular orientation in native hips, and determined whether pelvic tilt affects femoral head cover.

We analysed computed tomography scans of 93 hips (36 normal, 31 dysplastic, 26 with acetabular retroversion) and measured acetabular anteversion, inclination, and femoral head cover at pelvic tilt angles ranging from −20° to 20° in relation to the anterior pelvic plane using 5° increments.

The effect of pelvic tilt on version was similar in the normal, dysplastic, and retroverted groups, with a drop in anteversion ranging from 2.5° to 5° for every 5° of forward tilt.

There was a tendency for the inclination angle to decrease when the pelvis was tilted forward from a position of extension, and in normal hips, this produced a reduction in inclination of about 4° for every 8° of pelvic tilt; but once neutral pelvic tilt was reached, further forward rotation of the acetabulum had rather a small effect on the inclination angle.

In normal and dysplastic hips pelvic tilt increased apparent femoral head cover; in the retroverted group the effect was less marked and tended to be negligible at higher tilt angles. Anterior cover increased with increasing forward tilt in all three groups of hips. Posterior cover, on the other hand, decreased by just 2% for the dysplastic hips, 3.5% for the normal hips, and 6% for the retroverted hips over the whole range of tilt from −20° to 20°.

A greater understanding of the influence of pelvic tilt may allow improvements in the radiological diagnosis and surgical treatment of acetabular abnormalities, particularly in relation to acetabular reorientation procedures and femoroacetabular impingement.

Introduction

A new conservative hip stem has been designed to address the complex problem of total hip arthroplasty in the younger population.