Aims

We aimed to address the question on whether there is a place for shoulder stabilization surgery in patients who had voluntary posterior instability starting in childhood and adolescence, and later becoming involuntary and uncontrollable.

Introduction

Wound surveillance has been reported to result in a significant fall in the incidence of wound sepsis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is currently little guidance on the definition of surgical wound infection that is best to be used for surveillance. The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement between three common definitions of surgical wound infection as a performance indicator in TKA; (a) the CDC 1992 definition, (b) the NINSS modification of the CDC definition and (c) the ASEPSIS scoring method applied to the same series of surgical wounds.

Objective

To assess the usefulness of radiographs alone to evaluate acute midfoot/forefoot injuries. We believe that foot injuries are often under-estimated and that CT scans should be routinely obtained to aid in their management and avoid additional morbidity for patients.

Background

The management of chondral lesions in the knee, especially in young fit patients, remains an area of considerable controversy. Articular cartilage repair or reconstruction techniques may offer these patients alternatives to arthroplasty or realignment osteotomy. The TruFit plug (Smith & Nephew, London, UK) is a synthetic biphasic polymer scaffold that is designed for implantation at the site of a focal chondral defect. It is intended to resorb and allow tissue ingrowth 6-9 months following implantation and may be placed either arthroscopically or via an open approach depending on the site of the lesion.

There is mixed evidence in the literature regarding increasing age, ASA and BMI as risk factors for surgical site infection in orthopaedic surgery. To investigate the matter further, we examined 1055 wounds in 1008 patients in the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery at University College London Hospital between 2000 and 2006. All patients with a minimum two-night stay were included. Data was collected by four designated research nurses. The age, height, weight and ASA status of each patient was recorded. All wounds were classified using ASEPSIS. This is a quantitative wound scoring method which is a summation of scores calculated from visual wound characteristics and the clinical consequences of infection.

Our results showed a strong linear association between age and ASEPSIS scores. Single variable regression analysis showed a t value of 3.32 and p value of 0.001. A similar linear association was seen between ASA grading and ASEPSIS scores. Single variable regression analysis showed a t value of 2.75 and p value of 0.006. The association between BMI and ASEPSIS scores was markedly different from that seen with age and ASA. The graph was U-shaped with patients with a BMI of 25-30 having the lowest average ASEPSIS scores. Patients with a lower and a higher BMI had higher average ASEPSIS scores. Single variable regression analysis was not significant since the relationship between BMI and ASEPSIS scores is not linear.

In conclusion, there are clearly defined patient groups who are at increased risk of developing a surgical site infection: older patients, patients with a higher ASA, and patients with both a low and high BMI. These patients should be targeted to reduce overall infection rates. This can be achieved by ensuring adequate antibiotic prophylaxis, having a low threshold to treat suspected infection and arranging regular follow-up.

On 7 July 2005, four bombs were detonated on the London transport system. Three of these bombs exploded almost simultaneously at 08:50h affecting the underground tube network at Aldgate, King's Cross and Edgware Road stations. The fourth bomb exploded at 09:47h on a double-decker bus in Tavistock Square. There were 54 deaths in total at the scenes and over 700 injured.

194 patients were brought to the Royal London Hospital. 167 were assessed in a designated minor injuries unit and discharged on the same day. 27 patients were admitted of whom 7 required ITU care, 1 died in theatre and 1 died post-operatively. The median Injurity Severity Score (ISS) in this group of patients was 6 (range 0-48) and the mean ISS was 12. The general pattern of injury in the critically ill patients was of mangled lower limbs and multiple, severely contaminated fragment wounds. Hepatitis B prophylaxis was administered to those patients with wounds contaminated by foreign biological material. 11 primary limb amputations were performed in 7 patients. 9 limb fasciotomies, 5 laparotomies and 1 sternotomy were carried out. 3 patients had blast lung injury. All patients who underwent primary amputations and debridement received further regular inspections in theatre. These inspections formed the majority of our theatre work. Under no circumstance was initial reconstructive surgery attempted. Delayed primary closure and split skin grafting of all wounds was completed by the end of the second week. There have been no sepsis-related deaths.

Our experience at The Royal London has allowed us to revisit the principles of blast wound management in a peacetime setting. A number of lessons were learned regarding communication and resource allocation. A multi-disciplinary approach with the successful execution of a major incident plan is the key to managing an event of this magnitude.

Accurate placement of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty components is thought to be essential for the long-term survival and efficacy of the prosthesis. Computer navigation is being explored as a means of improving the accuracy of component position. There are few published studies comparing conventional and computer-navigated techniques using the same prosthesis.

Twenty-two Allegretto [Zimmer] medial unicompartmental knee prostheses were placed in 18 patients using the AxiEM [Medtronic] computer-navigated system. The immediate post-operative AP and lateral radiographs were analysed and compared with an equivalent cohort of 30 prostheses in 29 patients with medial unicompartmental arthritis in whom the Allegretto was placed without the aid of computer navigation. All operations were performed by the senior author in a rural Queensland hospital.

No cases were lost to follow-up. The data was not normally distributed. The mean, SD and variance of the data sets was calculated and significance tested with a 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. Computer navigated tibial components were implanted with a mean of 2 degrees of varus compared with 1 degree of valgus with conventional navigation [p = 0.027]. Our target was 0–4 degrees of varus. Eighteen of the 20 computer-navigated cases, 90% fell within the recommended range [0–4 degrees of varus] compared with only 40%, 12 of the 30 conventionally-implanted cases. This is demonstrated by the greater range and variance of the conventional navigation data set. Posterior slope for the computer navigated components was 1 degree compared with 3 degrees for conventional navigation [0.010]; only 1 computed navigated component [5%] was implanted with anterior slope compared with 4 cases for conventional navigation [13%]. Measurements of femoral component flexion and position with respect to the tibial component were not significantly different but demonstrated greater variance for the conventionally navigated data set.

Accurate component positioning improves efficacy and prosthesis survival for patients who meet the indications for unicompartmental surgery. However proponents acknowledge the weaknesses of conventional jigs for unicompartmental prostheses. In this study computer navigation has been shown to improve the accuracy of component placement.

Aims: To determine the rate of orthopaedic wound infection using ASEPSIS and compare this to the rate of infection as defined by the US Centres for Disease Control (CDC) and the UK Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Service (SSISS).

Background: It is a common misconception that reported rates of orthopaedic wound infection are accurate, reliable and reproducible. Most definitions of infection, including CDC and SSISS, are subjective and depend on the interpretation of the surgeon. ASEPSIS1 is a method of wound scoring which grades wounds as uninfected, disturbed healing, minor infection, moderate infection and severe infection. ASEPSIS scoring has been proven to be both objective and repeatable2.

Method: Over 4 years, 1113 orthopaedic wounds were prospectively evaluated using the CDC definition for surgical site infections, the SSISS definition and the ASEPSIS scoring method. Patients were seen pre-operatively and at 3 and 5 days post-operatively. They also completed a wound surveillance questionnaire at 2 months post-discharge.

Results: The overall infection rates were 8% as defined by CDC, 4% as defined by SSISS and 3% as defined by ASEPSIS. Further classification of the wounds as defined by ASEPSIS revealed that 91% of wounds showed no evidence of infection (score < 10), 6.6% showed a disturbance of healing (score 11–20), 2.3% had a minor infection (score 21–30), 0.4% had a moderate infection (score 31–40) and 0.3% had severe infection (score > 40).

Conclusion: This study illustrates that accurate wound surveillance is not simple. Different wound infection definitions give very different rates of infection and make comparisons between surgeons and hospitals impossible.

We propose that ASEPSIS provides the most accurate and reproducible results and also provides more information with the grading of wound infection. The overall rate of orthopaedic wound infection using the ASEPSIS method is 3%. If all hospitals used this scoring method, more accurate comparisons of infection rates could be made.

Introduction: Familial idiopathic scoliosis (FIS) is a complex genetic disorder potentially resulting from multiple genetic interactions and variants. A previous genome wide screen in a large population of families with FIS followed by fine mapping utilizing STRP’s identified and narrowed critical regions on chromosomes 9 and 16. A high density SNP map was then designed across these regions. This array was then assayed within the same population in an effort to link and/or associate specific genetic intervals or candidate genes with the expressed phenotype.

Methods: A sample of families with IS (202 families, 1198 individuals) was recruited with IRB approval and underwent a genomic screen. Results were analysed by model-independent linkage analysis (SIBPAL). Following initial analyses, families were then stratified according to mode of inheritance. 101 families (550 individuals) represented an autosomal dominant mode of heritability and underwent fine mapping in the candidate regions.

Custom SNP pools were designed for the candidate regions at a density of 1 SNP/58Kb. DNA from 550 individuals (AD group) were genotyped using the Illumina platform. A total of 1536 SNP markers were attempted, of which 1324 were released; 519 SNPs were genotyped on 9q32-24 and 805 SNPs genotyped on 16p12-q22. The map was generated using NCBI dbSNP chromosome report on Build 34. Overall missing rate was 0.06%; the overall duplicate error rate was 0.05%.

FIS was analysed both as a qualitative trait with an arbitrary threshold, and as a quantitative trait, or the degree of lateral curvature. Model independent sib-pair linkage analysis was performed on the subsets (SIBPAL, S. A. G. E. v4.5).

Results:

Chromosome 9: Multipoint model-independent qualitative analysis (threshold at ten degrees) did not result in any p values of < 0.05. When the threshold was set at 30 degrees, several regions with p values of < 0.005 were observed. One region spanned 10 Mb, and coincides with the region found to be most suggestive of linkage at the 0.05 level for the quantitative analysis which was 6 Mb in length.

Discussion: The current work has significance in the stepwise confirmation and narrowing of genomic regions which are potentially meaningful in the aetiology of FIS. Stratification of the initial sample into subgroups, initially by heritability and then by threshold of disease resulted in heightened significance at specific markers demonstrating the heterogeneity of this disorder. Ultimately, the independent association of genetic loci and this disorder will enhance the ability to elucidate prognosis, counsel patients, and guide therapeutic plans.

The Copeland Shoulder Arthroplasty is a cementless, pegged humeral head surface replacement. The design is based on the principle of minimal bone resection and has been in clinical use since 1986. The only published series to date, that of Levy and Copeland, reported results for 103 patients which were comparable to those obtained with stemmed implants. We report the outcome at our institution using the same prosthesis with a hydroxyapatite coating.

81 shoulders (74 patients) underwent resurfacing hemiarthroplasty through an anterior deltopectoral approach. Preoperative diagnoses were: osteoarthritis (39), rheumatoid arthritis (29), rotator cuff arthropathy (1), post-traumatic arthrosis (2). They were followed for an average 28 months. 10 were lost to follow-up (8 deaths).

Constant scores improved from a mean preoperative figure of 15.7 to 54.0 (p< 0.01) at last follow-up. For rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis the scores improved from 15.2 to 50.4 (p< 0.01) and 16.0 to 55.4 (p,< 0.01) respectively.

There was a 13% complication rate with one case requiring revision for loosening to a stemmed implant. Most were cases requiring subsequent acromioplasty. In one case the glenoid rim was fractured during head dislocation. There was a low rate of perioprosthetic radiolucency (4.2%) which may relate to the hydroxyappatite coating within the shell of the prosthesis. Ipsilateral stemmed elbow replacement was performed in some cases without a double stress riser effect. Periprosthetic humeral neck fracture as managed non-operatively with uneventful union.

Conclusion: The good outcome reported in Copeland’s own series has been replicated in the early to medium term at our institution. The surface replacement system is simpler, accurate and preserves bone stock.

Introduction Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an increasingly utilised alternative to tibial osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty in patients with single compartment degenerative disease. We report on four fractures of the medial tibial plateau following UKR.

Methods We retrospectively reviewed four cases with periprosthetic tibial plateau fractures following unicompartmental knee replacement. Each arthroplasty, performed between 1999 and 2002, was done in a community teaching hospital by a single orthopaedic surgeon and a senior level assistant. All patients had medial compartment osteoarthritis confirmed both radiographically and arthroscopically prior to arthroplasty surgery. The arthroplasties were performed by four different surgeons and three different arthroplasty systems were used. All cases were reviewed using the documented chart histories and x-ray evaluation. Each surgeon was contacted individually for the relevant case history and x-rays. The study population was composed of four females, and no males with a mean age of 63.5 years (range 58 to 68). Two patients (50%) had simultaneous bilateral UKRs performed. The remaining two patients had unilateral procedures, involving one right and one left knee. Two patients were clinically obese, and one patient had had a previous ipsilateral high tibial osteotomy.

Results The total number of fractures was four, involving three left knees and one right knee. Of the bilateral arthroplasties each patient sustained a unilateral fracture of the left knee. The patient with the previous tibial osteotomy sustained an ipsilateral fracture. Two fractures involved traumatic falls, the remaining fractures had no history of trauma. The mean post-operative period to fracture was 95.75 days with a range of 5 to 195 days. Two patients had revision surgery to total knee arthroplasty. One patient underwent internal fixation of the fracture with retention of the original prosthetic components and exchange of the polyethylene bearing. The remaining patient underwent revision of the tibial component with concurrent internal fixation and was subsequently revised to total knee arthroplasty as the result of failure. Subsequent to the described surgery all fractures have healed with no further surgical intervention.

Conclusions This series, whilst small, demonstrates that tibial periprosthetic fracture following UKR is a previously unreported but important cause of failure. Revision surgery to total knee replacement appears to be a reasonable salvage option.

Aim: To assess the functional and radiological outcome of AO wrist Arthrodesis using the AO wrist fusion plate.

Method: An 8 year, independent, retrospective, radiological and functional review was performed using The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) and the Buck-Gramcko/Lohmann outcome scores.

Results: Twenty-eight patients were reviewed. The two scoring systems correlated consistently in regards to the functional outcome. However, patients with systemic disease experienced problems completing the DASH questionnaire. Mono-articular arthritis was associated with an excellent/good outcome in 95% of cases. Results for patients with systemic disease were markedly worse. There was one case of plate breakage associated with a delayed union of the second MCP joint. There was a 100% union rate, no significant post-operative infections and no tendon ruptures.

Conclusion: The short to mid term clinical outcomes for the AO wrist fusion plate are encouraging and its use can be recommended in a variety of wrist pathologies.

The purpose of this study was to look at the results of using the Copeland surface replacement in the treatment of arthritis of the shoulder.

We report the results of 61 Type 3 Copeland surface replacements in 57 patients. Operations were performed in 33 cases of Rheumatoid Arthritis, 27 cases of Osteoarthritis and 1 case of posttraumatic arthritis. Hemiar-throplasty was performed via a Deltopectoral approach by the senior author in all cases. There were 38 females and 19 males with a minimum follow up of 1 year and a mean follow up of 26 months (range 12–65). Patients were scored pre and post operatively using the Constant score. Average pre-op score was 15.6 and post-operatively was 52.5. There was one case of loosening ( ? secondary to infection) requiring revision to a stemmed implant. Two patients required Sub-Acromial decompression for postoperative impingement. All patients considered their shoulder improved following this procedure. There was no evidence of radiolucency in any postoperative radiograph.

Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty in our series show similar results to previously reported series of stemmed implants and to the published results available for this implant.