Clinical pathways are optimal patient care processes that have been developed to improve the quality of care for patients. Anecdotal evidence has suggested that patients presenting to the healthcare system with rotator cuff tears experience less than ideal quality care plagued by lengthy wait times, challenges in coordinating care, and inefficient use of healthcare resources. Therefore, diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff tears are in need of quality improvement through evidence-informed decision making. The purpose of this study is to develop a clinical pathway for patients presenting to the healthcare system with rotator cuff tears. The following steps were taken in developing the clinical pathway: 1) a multidisciplinary expert panel was formed; 2) goals of the clinical pathway were identified by the panel; 3) the literature and current clinical practices for best practice were reviewed; 4) recommendations for treatment algorithms were developed using consensus methods. The panel consisted of fourteen experts representing the two largest cities in Alberta, Canada (Edmonton and Calgary). The team consisted of at least one member from the clinical domains of sport medicine, orthopaedic surgery, athletic therapy, and physiotherapy. The first goal of the clinical pathway was to standardise screening, diagnosis, and physical examination of the patient. The second goal was to provide recommendations for appropriate investigations. The final goal was to map steps in the patients' care pathway including sequencing and timing recommendations for treatment and interventions. Best practices were reviewed by the panel and using a modified Delphi method, clinical pathways for three types of rotator cuff tears (acute, chronic, and acute-on-chronic) were developed. A clinical pathway that reflected best practices was developed from the literature and experts. The clinical pathway for diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology will help to standardised patient care, improve patient flow, reduce unnecessary interventions, reduce healthcare utilisation and costs, and improve the quality of patient care.
Forty-five patients with fractures of the tibial spine were reviewed 3 to 10 years after injury in order to determine the degree of residual laxity of the cruciate or collateral ligaments. After fractures which had been partially or completely displaced, some anterior cruciate laxity was evident, even if patients were asymptomatic. It was also found that an anatomical reduction did not prevent either laxity or some loss of full extension of the knee.
The late results of tarsometatarsal injuries in 33 patients have been reviewed. The average follow-up period was 15 years (range 11 to 20 years). Methods of treatment included cast immobilisation, and closed or open reduction with or without internal fixation. All patients noted diminishing symptoms after injury and all but six returned to their former occupation. Neither the initial fracture type nor the treatment had any apparent bearing on subsequent function; nor was there any correlation between radiographic assessment of the injury and the patient's symptoms.
We have reviewed the notes and radiographs of 57 patients with fractures of the proximal humeral epiphysis and examined 30 of them at 2 to 8 years after injury. Regardless of treatment the maximum shortening of the humerus was 2 cm and residual varus angulation was insignificant. Manipulation of a displaced, fresh fracture did not improve the final outcome with respect to humeral growth or function; and open reduction is very rarely indicated.
Forty-six children with Monteggia fracture-dislocations have been studied. The circumstances of the accident could rarely be recalled so that the mechanism of injury remains unclear. The study did, however, confirm the importance of conservative management of the injury in children; unlike the adult variety, this gave very satisfactory results. Our review also supports the classification into three basic types of Monteggia lesion according to the direction of displacement of the dislocated radial head. For simplicity, all other types, variations or equivalents can be regarded as belonging to these basic patterns; in particular we include those controversial cases in which the radiohumeral dislocation is combined with a fractured olecranon.
Spondylolysis occurring after a spinal fusion is considered to result from operative damage to the pars interarticularis on both sides. Fourteen cases are reported, and compared with the 23 cases which have previously been published. The defects are usually recognised within five years of fusion, and usually occur immediately above the fusion mass. Other contributory causes may be: fatigue fracture from concentration of stress; damage and altered function of the posterior ligament complex; and degenerative disc disease immediately above or below the fusion. Fusion technique is critical, since virtually all cases occurred after posterior interlaminar fusions. This complication is easily overlooked in patients with recurrent back pain after an originally successful posterior spinal fusion.
