We report the kinematic and early clinical results
of a patient- and observer-blinded randomised controlled trial in which
CT scans were used to compare potential impingement-free range of
movement (ROM) and acetabular component cover between patients treated
with either the navigated ‘femur-first’ total hip arthroplasty (THA) method
(n = 66; male/female 29/37, mean age 62.5 years; 50 to 74) or conventional
THA (n = 69; male/female 35/34, mean age 62.9 years; 50 to 75).
The Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Harris hip score, the
Euro-Qol-5D and the Mancuso THA patient expectations score were
assessed at six weeks, six months and one year after surgery. A
total of 48 of the patients (84%) in the navigated ‘femur-first’
group and 43 (65%) in the conventional group reached all the desirable
potential ROM boundaries without prosthetic impingement for activities
of daily living (ADL) in flexion, extension, abduction, adduction
and rotation (p = 0.016). Acetabular component cover and surface
contact with the host bone were >
87% in both groups. There was
a significant difference between the navigated and the conventional
groups’ Harris hip scores six weeks after surgery (p = 0.010). There
were no significant differences with respect to any clinical outcome
at six months and one year of follow-up. The navigated ‘femur-first’
technique improves the potential ROM for ADL without prosthetic
impingement, although there was no observed clinical difference
between the two treatment groups. Cite this article:
Femoral stem version has a major influence on
impingement and early post-operative stability after total hip arthroplasty
(THA). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the validity
of a novel radiological method for measuring stem version. Anteroposterior
(AP) radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans were obtained for
115 patients (female/male 63/72, mean age 62.5 years (50 to 75))
who had undergone minimally invasive, cementless THA. Stem version was
calculated from the AP hip radiograph by rotation-based change in
the projected prosthetic neck–shaft (NSA*) angle using the mathematical
formula ST = arcos [tan (NSA*) / tan (135)]. We used two independent
observers who repeated the analysis after a six-week interval. Radiological
measurements were compared with 3D-CT measurements by an independent,
blinded external institute. We found a mean difference of 1.2° ( We found that femoral tilt was associated with the mean radiological
measurement error (r = 0.22, p = 0.02). The projected neck–shaft angle is a reliable method for measuring
stem version on AP radiographs of the hip after a THA. However,
a highly standardised radiological technique is required for its
precise measurement. Cite this article:
