Arthritis of the wrist is a painful disabling condition that has various causes and presentations. The traditional treatment has been a total wrist fusion at a price of the elimination of movement. However, forms of treatment which allow the preservation of movement are now preferred. Modern arthroplasties of the wrist are still not sufficiently robust to meet the demands of many patients, nor do they restore normal kinematics of the wrist. A preferable compromise may be selective excision and partial fusion of the wrist using knowledge of the aetiology and pattern of degenerative change to identify which joints can be sacrificed and which can be preserved.

This article provides an overview of the treatment options available for patients with arthritis of the wrist and an algorithm for selecting an appropriate surgical strategy.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1303–8.

Aim

To construct and validate a simple patient related outcome measure scheme to quantify the disability caused by Dupuytren's Disease thus enabling prioritisation of treatment, allow reliable audit of surgical outcome and support future research.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of intermittent mechanical compression combined with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, against either mechanical compression or pharmacological prophylaxis in preventing deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. A total of six randomised controlled trials, evaluating a total of 1399 patients, were identified. In knee arthroplasty, the rate of DVT was reduced from 18.7% with anticoagulation alone to 3.7% with combined modalities (risk ratio (RR) 0.27, p = 0.03; number needed to treat: seven). There was moderate, albeit non-significant, heterogeneity (I² = 42%). In hip replacement, there was a non-significant reduction in DVT from 8.7% with mechanical compression alone to 7.2% with additional pharmacological prophylaxis (RR 0.84) and a significant reduction in DVT from 9.7% with anticoagulation alone to 0.9% with additional mechanical compression (RR 0.17, p < 0.001; number needed to treat: 12), with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%). The included studies had insufficient power to demonstrate an effect on pulmonary embolism.

We conclude that the addition of intermittent mechanical leg compression augments the efficacy of anticoagulation in preventing DVT in patients undergoing both knee and hip replacement. Further research on the role of combined modalities in thromboprophylaxis in joint replacement and in other high-risk situations, such as fracture of the hip, is warranted.

Introduction: Pharmacological and mechanical methods are recommended to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) following hip replacement (THR). However, data on mechanical methods such as graduated compressive stockings (GCS) are limited. This study examined the efficacy and safety of GCS when added to fondaparinux.

Methods: The randomised treatments were 2.5 mg fondaparinux for 5–9 days starting postoperatively alone or with GCS for 42±7 days. The primary efficacy outcome was VTE or sudden death prior to Day 42±7. All patients were to have duplex USS at day 42 + 7. VTE was defined by verified symptomatic VTE or asymptomatic proximal DVT. The main safety outcomes were major and minor bleeding and VTE death.

Results: 856 patients were randomised, of which 799 were THR patients. Of these 756 (95%) were evaluable, 377 in the fondaparinux and 379 in the fondaparinux plus GCS groups. Risk factors for thrombosis were recorded (age > 75 in 20%, history of obesity in 21%, cancer in 6% and VTE in 3%). Compliance with GCS was high, with 85% wearing them continuously. The primary efficacy outcome of VTE or sudden death in THR patients was similar in each treatment group, the results were 5.5% in the fondaparinux only group and 5.3% in the fondaparinux with GCS group; odds ratio was 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.50–1.83, p=0.91. Outcomes were not different for long-length and short-length stockings. Major bleeding occurred in one patient (< 1%), minor bleeding in 6.7%. No VTE deaths were reported.

Discussion: The addition of GCS to fondaparinux showed no benefit in thromboprophylaxis over fondaparinux alone in this large study of THR patients. Therefore GCS may not be indicated in patients receiving fondaparinux. Graduated compression stockings are time consuming to measure and fit, inconvenient and expensive; therefore we recommend a reconsideration of this current and commonly used practice in THR.

Efficient utilisation of the trauma list is an important aspect of trauma care in the NHS. An audit of the trauma theatre time utilisation was done from April 1999 to March 2000. Ideally the first case should start at 8:30 am. However, we found that the first patient was on the operating table only by 9:40 am (mean). The main reasons for the delay were the time required for the anaesthetist to see the patient and the other staff to set up the necessary equipments. We decided to identify the first case of the trauma list the day before, so that the anaesthetist can review the patient the previous day. We felt that this would also give adequate time for the theatre staff to set up their instruments. However, this did not improve the theatre timings.

We introduced the novel idea of performing a carpal tunnel decompression at the beginning of each trauma list to make use of the redundant time without an extra financial burden to the hospital. Carpal tunnel decompression can be performed under local anaesthetic by a basic grade surgeon. This would also give time for the anaesthetist and the consultant surgeon to review the patients on the trauma list.

The theatre time utilisation was re-audited a year following the introduction of carpal tunnel release. The patient for carpal tunnel decompression was on table at 8:44 am (mean). The first trauma case was on operating table at 9:46 am (mean). Therefore, in spite of performing an additional surgery on the list, there was a delay of only 6 minutes. This simple idea has helped us to do an additional case every day with only a 6 minute delay to the trauma list.

Thromboprophylaxis remains a controversial subject. A vast amount of epidemiological and trial data about venous thromboembolism has been published over the past 40 years. These data have been distilled and synthesised into guidelines designed to help the practitioner translate this extensive research into ‘evidence-based’ advice.

Guidelines should, in theory, benefit patient care by ensuring that every patient routinely receives the best prophylaxis; without guidelines, it is argued, patients may fail to receive treatment or be exposed to protocols which are ineffective, dangerous or expensive.

Guidelines, however, have not been welcomed or applied universally. In the United States, orthopaedic surgeons have published their concerns about the thromboprophylaxis guidelines prepared by the American College of Chest Physicians. In Britain, controversy persists with many surgeons unconvinced of the risk/benefit, cost/benefit or practicality of thromboprophylaxis. The extended remit of the recent National Institute of Clinical Excellence thromboprophylaxis guidelines has been challenged.

The reasons for this disquiet are addressed in this paper and particular emphasis is placed on how clinically-acceptable guidelines could be developed and applied.

Little is known about the efficacy of graduated compression stockings in preventing venous thromboembolism after hip surgery. We conducted a prospective, randomised single-blind study to determine whether the addition of compression stockings to fondaparinux conferred any additional benefit.

The study included 874 patients, of whom 795 could be evaluated (400 in the fondaparinux group and 395 in the fondaparinux plus compression stocking group). Fondaparinux was given post-operatively for five to nine days, either alone or combined with wearing stockings, which were worn for a mean 42 days (35 to 49).

The study outcomes were venous thromboembolism, or sudden death before day 42. Duplex ultrasonography was scheduled within a week of day 42. Safety outcomes were bleeding and death from venous thromboembolism.

The prevalence of deep-vein thrombosis was similar in the two groups 5.5% (22 of 400) in the fondaparinux group and 4.8 (19 of 395) in the fondaparinux plus stocking group (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 1.65, p = 0.69). Major bleeding occurred in only one patient.

The addition of graduated compression stockings to fondaparinux appears to offer no additional benefit over the use of fondaparinux alone.

Patients who have undergone total hip or knee replacement (THR and TKR, respectively) are at high risk of venous thromboembolism. We aimed to determine the time courses of both the incidence of venous thromboembolism and effective prophylaxis. Patients with elective primary THR and TKR were enrolled in the multi-national Global Orthopaedic Registry. Data on the incidence of venous thromboembolism and prophylaxis were collected from 6639 THR and 8326 TKR patients.

The cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism within three months of surgery was 1.7% in the THR and 2.3% in the TKR patients. The mean times to venous thromboembolism were 21.5 days (sd 22.5) for THR, and 9.7 days (sd 14.1) for TKR. It occurred after the median time to discharge in 75% of the THR and 57% of the TKA patients who developed venous thromboembolism. Of those who received recommended forms of prophylaxis, approximately one-quarter (26% of THR and 27% of TKR patients) were not receiving it seven days after surgery, the minimum duration recommended at the time of the study.

The risk of venous thromboembolism extends beyond the usual period of hospitalisation, while the duration of prophylaxis is often shorter than this. Practices should be re-assessed to ensure that patients receive appropriate durations of prophylaxis.

Patients who undergo total knee replacement (TKR)are at high risk of venous thromboembolism. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are the most suitable chemical prophylactic agents but there are some uncertainties about their safety and effectiveness. The foot pump offers an alternative.

We randomised 229 patients undergoing primary, unilateral TKR to receive either the A-V Impulse foot pump or enoxaparin, a LMWH. Ascending venography was undertaken between the sixth and eighth postoperative day in 188 patients without knowledge of the randomisation category. The prevalence of venographic deep-vein thrombosis was 58% (57/99) in the foot-pump group and 54% (48/89) in the LMWH group which was not statistically significant. There were four cases of proximal thrombi and two of fatal pulmonary emboli in the foot-pump group and none in the LMWH group. There were fewer haemorrhagic complications and soft-tissue effects in the foot-pump group.

We conclude that the neither method provides superior prophylaxis.