The aim of this study was to investigate the association between fracture displacement and survivorship of the native hip joint without conversion to a total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to determine predictors for conversion to THA in patients treated nonoperatively for acetabular fractures. A multicentre cross-sectional study was performed in 170 patients who were treated nonoperatively for an acetabular fracture in three level 1 trauma centres. Using the post-injury diagnostic CT scan, the maximum gap and step-off values in the weightbearing dome were digitally measured by two trauma surgeons. Native hip survival was reported using Kaplan-Meier curves. Predictors for conversion to THA were determined using Cox regression analysis.Aims
Methods
Factors associated with high mortality rates in geriatric hip fracture patients are frequently unmodifiable. Time to surgery, however, might be a modifiable factor of interest to optimize clinical outcomes after hip fracture surgery. This study aims to determine the influence of postponement of surgery due to non-medical reasons on clinical outcomes in acute hip fracture surgery. This observational cohort study enrolled consecutively admitted patients with a proximal femoral fracture, for which surgery was performed between 1 January 2018 and 11 January 2021 in two level II trauma teaching hospitals. Patients with medical indications to postpone surgery were excluded. A total of 1,803 patients were included, of whom 1,428 had surgery < 24 hours and 375 had surgery ≥ 24 hours after admission.Aims
Methods
The principle strategies of fracture-related infection (FRI) treatment are debridement, antimicrobial therapy, and implant retention (DAIR) or debridement, antimicrobial therapy, and implant removal/exchange. Increasing the period between fracture fixation and FRI revision surgery is believed to be associated with higher failure rates after DAIR. However, a clear time-related cut-off has never been scientifically defined. This systematic review analyzed the influence of the interval between fracture fixation and FRI revision surgery on success rates after DAIR. A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in PubMed (including MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection, investigating the outcome after DAIR procedures of long bone FRIs in clinical studies published until January 2020.Aims
Methods
The aim of this systematic review was to determine the reported treatment strategies, their individual success rates, and other outcome parameters in the management of critical-sized bone defects in Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) patients between 1990 and 2018. We performed a systematic literature search on treatment and outcome of critical-sized bone defects in FRI. Treatment strategies identified were, autologous cancellous grafts, autologous cancellous grafts combined with local antibiotics, the induced membrane technique, vascularized grafts, bone transport, and bone transport combined with local antibiotics. Studies describing bone defects of 1 cm or greater were included. Outcomes were bone healing and infection eradication after primary surgical protocol and recurrence of FRI and amputations at the end of study period.Aim
Method
Infection rates after management of open fractures are still high. Existing guidelines regarding prevention of this complication are inhomogeneous. A survey directed to orthopaedic trauma surgeons worldwide aims to give an overview of current practices in the management of open fractures. An international group of trauma surgeons and infection specialists with experience in the field of musculoskeletal infections developed a questionnaire that was distributed via email to all AOTrauma members worldwide. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed.Aim
Method
We assessed the long-term (20 years) outcome
of closed reduction and immobilisation in 19 patients with an isolated
fracture of the posterior malleolus of the ankle treated at a single
hospital between 1985 and 1990. The assessments used were an Olerud
functional questionnaire score, physical examination using a loaded
dorsal and plantar range of movement measurement, radiological analysis
of medial joint space widening, the Cedell score for anatomical
alignment of all three malleoli, and the radiological presence of
osteoarthritic change. There were excellent or good results in 14 patients (74%) according
to the Olerud score, in 18 patients (95%) according to loaded dorsal
and plantar range of movement assessment, in 16 patients (84%) as
judged by the Cedell score, and for osteoarthritis 18 patients (95%)
had an excellent or good score. There were no poor outcomes. There was
no correlation between the size of the fracture gap and the proportion
of the tibiotalar contact area when compared with the clinical results
(gap size: rho values -0.16 to 0.04, p ≥ 0.51; tibiotalar contact
area: rho values -0.20 to -0.03, p ≥ 0.4). Conservative treatment
of ‘isolated’ posterior malleolar fractures resulted in good clinical
and radiological outcome in this series at long-term follow-up.
This retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate whether operative treatment of patients with a pertrochanteric femoral fracture outside working hours is associated with an increased risk of complications and higher mortality. During the study period 165 patients were operated on outside working hours and 123 were operated on during working hours (08.00 to 17.00). There was no difference in the rate of early complications (outside working hours 33% versus working hours 33%, p = 0.91) or total complications during follow-up (outside working hours 40% versus working hours 41%, p = 0.91). Both in-hospital mortality (outside working hours 12% versus working hours 11%, p = 0.97) and mortality after one year (outside working hours 29% versus working hours 27%, p = 0.67) were comparable. Adjustment for possible confounders by multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed no increased risk of complications when patients were operated on outside working hours. On the basis of these data, there is no medical reason to postpone operative reduction and fixation in patients with a proximal femoral fracture until working hours.
