Optimal exposure through the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) conducted on a regular operating theatre table is achieved with a standardized capsular releasing sequence in which the anterior capsule can be preserved or resected. We hypothesized that clinical outcomes and implant positioning would not be different in case a capsular sparing (CS) technique would be compared to capsular resection (CR). In this prospective trial, 219 hips in 190 patients were randomized to either the CS (n = 104) or CR (n = 115) cohort. In the CS cohort, a medial based anterior flap was created and sutured back in place at the end of the procedure. The anterior capsule was resected in the CR cohort. Primary outcome was defined as the difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after one year. PROMs (Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and Short Form 36 Item Health Survey (SF-36)) were collected preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Radiological parameters were analyzed to assess implant positioning and implant ingrowth. Adverse events were monitored.Aims
Methods
The capsular releasing sequence is crucial to safely conduct the Direct Anterior Approach for THA on a regular OR table. The release of the anterior capsule is the first step of the releasing sequence and allows for optimal exposure. This can be done by either resecting a part of the anterior capsule or by preserving it. Our zero hypothesis was that clinical outcomes would not be different between both techniques. 190 Patients operated between November 2017 and May 2018, met the inclusion criteria and were randomly allocated in a double blinded study to either the capsular resection (CR)(N=99) or capsular preservation (CP)(N=91) cohort. The same cementless implant was used in all cases. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) were collected pre- and post-operatively at 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year. Adverse events were recorded. Outcomes were compared with the Mann-Withney U test and a significance level of p<0,05.INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS & METHODS
Malrotation of the femoral component is a cause of patellofemoral maltracking after TKA. Its precise effect on the patellofemoral (PF) mechanics has not been well quantified. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of malrotation of the femoral component on PF initial contact area, initial contact pressure and wear after 4 million full gait cycles in TKA using a knee simulator. Moreover, the influence of the counterface material (CoCr or OxZr) on PF wear was also investigated. Femoral components (FCs) were cemented onto specially designed fixtures, allowing positioning of the FC in different angles of axial rotation. Patellar buttons and FCs were then mounted in a Prosim knee simulator.Introduction
Materials & Methods
Complications involving the patellofemoral joint,
caused by malrotation of the femoral component during total knee replacement,
are an important cause of persistent pain and failure leading to
revision surgery. The aim of this study was to determine and quantify
the influence of femoral component malrotation on patellofemoral
wear, and to determine whether or not there is a difference in the
rate of wear of the patellar component when articulated against
oxidised zirconium (OxZr) and cobalt-chrome (CoCr) components. An The results suggest that patellar maltracking due to an internally
rotated femoral component leads to an increased mean patellar wear.
Although not statistically significant, the mean wear production
may be lower for OxZr than for CoCr components.
