Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are challenging complications following arthroplasty. Staphylococci are a frequent cause of PJI and known biofilm producers. Reoperations for PJI of the hip or knee between 2012 and 2015 performed at Sahlgrenska University Hospital were identified. Medical records were reviewed, and clinical parameters recorded for patients whose intraoperative bacterial isolates had been stored at the clinical laboratory. Staphylococcal strains isolated from reoperations due to first-time PJI were characterised by their ability to form biofilms using the microtiter plate test. The study group included 49 patients (70 bacterial strains) from first-time PJI, whereof 24 (49%) patients had recurrent infection. Strong biofilm production was significantly associated with recurrent infection. Patients infected with strong biofilm producers had a five-fold increased risk for recurrent infection. Strong biofilm production was significantly associated with increased antimicrobial resistance and PJI recurrence. This underscores the importance of determining biofilm production and susceptibility as part of routine diagnostics in PJI. Strong staphylococcal biofilm production may have implications on therapeutic choices and suggest more extensive surgery. Furthermore, despite the increased biofilm resistance to rifampicin, results from this study support its use in staphylococcal PJI.
Calcium phosphates are among the most commonly used bone graft substitute materials. Compositions containing predominantly monetite (∼84.7%) with smaller additions of beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP; ∼8.3%) and calcium pyrophosphate (Ca-PP; ∼6.8%) have previously been demonstrated to exhibit osteoinductive properties. Such a multi-component calcium phosphate bioceramic was fashioned in the form of hollowed-out, dome-shaped devices (15 mm diameter, 4 mm height), each reinforced with a 3D printed Ti6Al4V ELI frame. With the aim to induce bone formation beyond the skeletal envelope, these devices were investigated in vivo using a sheep (Ovis aries) occipital bone model. The bioceramic composition was prepared from a mixture of β-TCP/dicalcium pyrophosphate and monocalcium phosphate monohydrate powders mixed with glycerol. The Ti6Al4V ELI frame was positioned into a dome-shaped mould and bioceramic paste was poured over the frame and allowed to set, in sterile water, prior to removal from the mould. In adult female sheep (n=7), the devices were positioned directly over the bone and stabilised using self-drilling screws. After 52 weeks, the devices were retrieved, resin embedded, and used for X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), histology, backscattered electron scanning electron microscopy (BSE-SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), micro-Raman spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).Introduction and Objective
Materials and Methods
The aim of this study was to describe implant and patient-reported outcome in patients with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) treated with a bone-anchored, transcutaneous prosthesis. In this cohort study, all patients with a unilateral TFA treated with the Osseointegrated Prostheses for the Rehabilitation of Amputees (OPRA) implant system in Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, between January 1999 and December 2017 were included. The cohort comprised 111 patients (78 male (70%)), with a mean age 45 years (17 to 70). The main reason for amputation was trauma in 75 (68%) and tumours in 23 (21%). Patients answered the Questionnaire for Persons with Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA) before treatment and at two, five, seven, ten, and 15 years’ follow-up. A prosthetic activity grade was assigned to each patient at each timepoint. All mechanical complications, defined as fracture, bending, or wear to any part of the implant system resulting in removal or change, were recorded.Aims
Methods
15 to 18 years postoperatively these patients and their hip radiographs were examined by an independent observer (WD) to establish the long term survival, clinical and radiographical performance of this stem and especially to compare the two coatings. The Harris hip score was employed for clinical evaluation
