header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 10 | Pages 451 - 458
1 Oct 2019
Classification of osteonecrosis of the femoral head
Kuroda Y Tanaka T Miyagawa T Kawai T Goto K Tanaka S Matsuda S Akiyama H
Full Access
View article Download PDF

Objectives

Using a simple classification method, we aimed to estimate the collapse rate due to osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in order to develop treatment guidelines for joint-preserving surgeries.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 505 hips from 310 patients (141 men, 169 women; mean age 45.5 years (sd 14.9; 15 to 86)) diagnosed with ONFH and classified them using the Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification. The JIC system includes four visualized types based on the location and size of osteonecrotic lesions on weightbearing surfaces (types A, B, C1, and C2) and the stage of ONFH. The collapse rate due to ONFH was calculated using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, with radiological collapse/arthroplasty as endpoints.

The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 1 | Pages 50 - 55
1 Jan 2018
In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of normal knees during different high-flexion activities
Kono K Tomita T Futai K Yamazaki T Tanaka S Yoshikawa H Sugamoto K
Full Access
View article Download PDF

Aims

In Asia and the Middle-East, people often flex their knees deeply in order to perform activities of daily living. The purpose of this study was to investigate the 3D kinematics of normal knees during high-flexion activities. Our hypothesis was that the femorotibial rotation, varus-valgus angle, translations, and kinematic pathway of normal knees during high-flexion activities, varied according to activity.

Materials and Methods

We investigated the in vivo kinematics of eight normal knees in four male volunteers (mean age 41.8 years; 37 to 53) using 2D and 3D registration technique, and modelled the knees with a computer aided design program. Each subject squatted, kneeled, and sat cross-legged. We evaluated the femoral rotation and varus-valgus angle relative to the tibia and anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral side, using the transepicodylar axis as our femoral reference relative to the perpendicular projection on to the tibial plateau. This method evaluates the femur medially from what has elsewhere been described as the extension facet centre, and differs from the method classically applied.