header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 6 | Pages 683 - 692
1 Jun 2020
Arnold N Anis H Barsoum WK Bloomfield MR Brooks PJ Higuera CA Kamath AF Klika A Krebs VE Mesko NW Molloy RM Mont MA Murray TG Patel PD Strnad G Stearns KL Warren J Zajichek A Piuzzi NS

Aims

Thresholds for operative eligibility based on body mass index (BMI) alone may restrict patient access to the benefits of arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between BMI and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to determine how many patients would have been denied improvements in PROMs if BMI cut-offs were to be implemented.

Methods

A prospective cohort of 3,449 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. The following one-year PROMs were evaluated: hip injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) pain, HOOS Physical Function Shortform (PS), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity, Veterans Rand-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS). Positive predictive values for failure to improve and the number of patients denied surgery in order to avoid a failed improvement were calculated for each PROM at different BMI cut-offs.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 53 - 53
1 May 2016
Brooks P Strnad G
Full Access

Hip resurfacing has been proposed as an alternative to traditional total hip replacement in young, active patients. Metal-on-metal resurfacing devices were introduced in the 1990's, and a number of them reached the international market. The promise of bone preservation, more normal loading, greater activity, and easier revision led many surgeons to begin implanting these devices.

Over time, lessons have been learned regarding patient selection, implant selection, and surgical technique. Several devices have been withdrawn from the market, and many surgeons have abandoned the procedure. We continue to perform this procedure in substantial numbers, approximately 350 per year. The triad of a well-designed device, implanted accurately, in the correct patient has never been more critical than with these implants.

Following FDA approval in 2006, we studied the safety and effectiveness of one hip resurfacing device at our US institution in a large, single-surgeon series. We report our early to mid–term results in 476 patients who were under the age of 50 years at the time of hip resurfacing. Their average age was 42.8 (12–49) with an average follow-up of 4.8 years (2–8.8). Males represented 76% of the patients, and 91% had osteoarthritis. The average component size was 50.8mm (44–58) in men and 45.3mm (40–50) in women.

All surgery was performed in the lateral position using an anterolateral approach. Patients were allowed 75% weight-bearing for 6 weeks, followed by avoidance of strenuous exertion (running, jumping, heavy lifting) for 12 months. Follow-up intervals were 6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. Follow-up percentage was 81%.

We measured a number of outcomes scores using a validated prospective observational registry at each follow-up interval. Improvement in HOOS Function was from pre-op of 41.4 + 22.7 to 93.5 + 15.2, Physical Activity Limitation improved from 2.4 + 2.5 to 8.2 + 2.6, and SF-12 Physical Composite Score improved from 31.7 +10.3 to 49.4 + 10.2.

There were no device-related failures in this series. There were no femoral neck fractures, no femoral component loosening, no failure of acetabular ingrowth, and no metal-related complications or pseudotumors. Two male patients, one a known heroin user, and the other with septic discitis, had remote hematogenous sepsis requiring component removal, each at 38 months after resurfacing. One female fell down an escalator 32 months after resurfacing sustaining a fractured acetabulum requiring component revision. Overall survivorship was 99.4%. Aseptic survivorship in males under age 50 was 100%.

We believe that hip resurfacing continues to offer a viable alternative for younger patients who would otherwise be candidates for total hip arthroplasty.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 541 - 541
1 Dec 2013
Higuera C Styron J Strnad G Barsoum W Iannotti J
Full Access

Introduction:

Patient medical comorbidities are well-established risk modifiers of THA patient outcomes. Patient's mental state preoperatively may influence postoperative functional outcomes though just like any medical comorbidity. This study sought to determine if patient confidence in attaining post-operative functional goals was associated with objective and subjective outcomes following THA.

Methods:

Patients undergoing primary or revision THA at a single institution between 2008 and 2010 were administered a questionnaire consisting of demographics, body mass index, Hip Dysfunction Osteoarthritis and Outcomes Score (HOOS), SF-12 scores, the level of functionality they hoped to gain postoperatively and their confidence in attaining that goal (0–10 scale) preoperatively and postoperatively at last follow-up (minimum 12 months). Measured outcomes included length of stay, 30-day readmission, HOOS, and SF-12 physical component scores. Correlation of patient confidence in attaining treatment goals and the outcomes collected was established using multiple linear and logistic regression models that were adjusted for all variables, including baseline mental and functional scores.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 348 - 348
1 Dec 2013
Higuera C Styron J Strnad G Iannotti J
Full Access

Introduction:

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes drive assessment of quality and reinvestment; therefore a risk stratified assessment is paramount for fair evaluation. Stratification can be affected by multiple factors including patient motivation. This study attempted to identify the correlation of patient's preoperative confidence in their ability to return to desired activity level after TKA and improved function and outcomes.

Methods:

A continuous series of TKA procedures from 2008 to 2010 in a healthcare system was reviewed retrospectively. Patients included reported pre- and postoperative knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes scores (KOOS), SF-12 scores, and responded a question regarding the desired activity level, including the level of confidence (0–10 scale) in attaining such goals, after surgery. Gender, age, body mass index, education level, smoking status, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission and reoperation, and 1-year infection rates were collected. Correlation of patient confidence in attaining treatment goals and the outcomes collected was established using multiple linear and logistic regression models adjusted for baseline mental and functional scores.