Aims

The current global pandemic due to COVID-19 is generating significant burden on the health service in the UK. On 23 March 2020, the UK government issued requirements for a national lockdown. The aim of this multicentre study is to gain a greater understanding of the impact lockdown has had on the rates, mechanisms and types of injuries together with their management across a regional trauma service.

With the recent reductions in junior doctor hours levels of staffing have become ever more critical as clinical duties are covered with fewer junior doctors available on a daily basis. Trainees also have to meet specific requirements of the curriculum and thus need to be allocated to posts with suitable opportunities. There is little evidence available to account for the allocation of posts to individual trusts and departments with training post numbers seem driven by historical allocation, rather than based on trainee and local population needs.

‘SHO’ tier numbers were obtained for each orthopaedic department within the Yorkshire deanery through direct contact with the departments. Data was also obtained to establish the workload of these departments. Information was gathered from the national neck of femur database, hospital episode statistics, the national joint registry, the trauma audit and research network (TARN) and finally Dr Foster and the national census. The workload data was then analysed and compared to the staffing levels in each department.

Data was obtained for fourteen trusts across the Yorkshire Deanery. The percentage of SHO tier doctors in training posts ranged from 0 to 78% (mean 37%) across the trusts surveyed, with wide variation in make up of the SHO tier in each department.

Workload was standardised using the unit of cases/SHO/annum. The workload for neck of femur fractures ranged from 8 to 52 cases/SHO/annum (mean 36). General trauma admissions ranged from 199 to 383 cases/SHO/annum (mean 288). Elective arthroplasty admissions ranged from 11 to 174 (mean 70). Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.5 for elective arthroplasty and neck of femur admissions and 0.8 for trauma admissions.

There is wide variation in workload between trusts when standardised for the number of SHO's with weak to moderate correlations between the number of juniors and workload in each department. This wide variation will impact on patient care, but also the training opportunities available in different posts – where workload is higher it is likely there will be an increased need for ward based work away from clinics and theatre lists.

The introduction of the foundation programme and MMC has changed the structure of the SHO grade at a time when the EWTD introduction has also had a profound impact on working patterns and hours. At this time we believe there is a need for a review of trainee allocations nationally with comparison to workload in each trust, trainee logbook data and data on curriculum competencies met. With the proposed reductions in trainee numbers now is the time for a centrally led review of these posts via the Royal College, BOA and BOTA to ensure high quality training, maintain high standards of patient care and secure the future of the orthopaedic profession.