Methods

We retrospectively collected data from 226 patients (90 hips, 136 knees) with periprosthetic joint infection who underwent two-stage revision between August 2011 and September 2021, with a minimum follow-up of one year. Histology was assessed via the SLIM classification. First, we analyzed whether patients with positive permanent sections at reimplantation had higher reinfection rates than patients with negative histology. Further, we compared permanent and frozen section results, and assessed the influence of anatomical regions (knee versus hip), low- versus high-grade infections, as well as first revision versus multiple prior revisions on the histological result at reimplantation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), chi-squared tests, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated.

Methods

3D-printed titanium implants were inserted into an oversized drill-hole in the tibiae of C57Bl/6 mice (n = 54). After implantation, the mice were randomly divided into three treatment groups (phosphate buffered saline (PBS)-control, iPTH, and delayed iPTH). Radiological analysis, micro-CT (µCT), and biomechanical pull-out testing were performed to assess implant loosening, bone formation, and osseointegration. Peri-implant tissue formation and cellular composition were evaluated by histology.

Method

In this retrospective study, 177 patients with an indicated revision surgery after a total joint replacement were included from 2015 to 2019. The easily accessible and routinely available serum parameters CRP, WBC, the percentage of neutrophils (%N), the neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR), fibrinogen and the platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PC/mPV) were evaluated preoperatively. The performances were examined via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (AUC). The curves were compared using the z-test. Seventy-five cases (42%) showed a PJI based on the pEBJIS-criteria.

Methods

3D-printed titanium implants were inserted in an oversized drill-hole in the tibia of C57Bl/6 mice (n=54). After implantation, the mice were randomly divided in 3 treatment groups (control: PBS-vehicle; iPTH; delayed iPTH). Radiographic analysis was performed to confirm signs of implant loosening. Peri-implant tissue formation was assessed through histology. Osseointegration was assessed through µCT and biomechanical pullout testing.

Methods

The ability of PlySs2 and vancomycin to kill biofilm and colony-forming units (CFUs) on orthopaedic implants were compared using in vitro models. An in vivo murine PJI model of DAIR was used to assess the efficacy of a combination of PlySs2 and vancomycin on periprosthetic bacterial load.

Methods

In-vitro: Xen 36 S. aureus biofilm was grown on Ti-6Al-4V mouse tibial implants for 1 day or 5 days and subsequently exposed to growth media, 1000× minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) Vancomycin, or 5× MIC PlySs2. Implants were sonicated and analyzed for Colony Forming Units (CFU).

In-vivo: A Ti-6Al-4V implant was inserted into the proximal tibia of C57BL/6J mice (n=21). All mice received 10⁴ CFU inoculation of Xen 36 S. aureus to the knee joint capsule and the infection was permitted 5 days to progress. On day 5 the mice were separated into three groups (n=7/group): (1) no further surgical intervention (control group), (2) irrigation and debridement (I&D) with saline, (3) I&D with 2mg/mL PlySs2. No implant-exchange was performed to mimic a debridement, antibiotic, and implant retention (DAIR) therapeutic strategy. All mice were sacrificed at day 10.

Patients and Methods

Consecutive patients with suspected septic arthritis undergoing aseptic diagnostic joint aspiration were included. The aspirate was used for analysis by mPCR and conventional microbiological analysis. A joint was classed as septic according to modified Newman criteria. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of the mPCR and the synovial fluid culture were compared using the z-test. A total of 72 out of 76 consecutive patients (33 women, 39 men; mean age 64 years (22 to 92)) with suspected septic arthritis were included in this study.

Patients and Methods

We studied 50 patients (28 women, 22 men, mean age 65 years; 20 to 89) with a clinical indication for revision arthroplasty who met the inclusion criteria of this prospective diagnostic study. The presence of α-defensin was determined using the qualitative Synovasure test and compared with standard diagnostic methods for PJI. Based on modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, 13 cases were categorised as septic and 36 as aseptic revisions. One test was inconclusive.

Method

A retrospective matched-pair analysis with 98 patients who had undergone revision-surgery after TJA was performed. Forty-nine patients who showed 1 to 3 positive minor criteria (PMC) whereas 49 patients without any positive minor criteria (aseptic complications control group) were compared regarding re-revision-rate and revision-free survival. Patients were matched regarding sex, age, joint and comorbidities using the classification system by McPherson et al. Reasons for revisions were categorized in loosening, body wear, periprosthetic fracture/mechanical failure and soft-tissue complication. Endpoints were defined as re-revision for any cases.

Method

In this study, 50 patient with indicated revision surgery met the inclusion criteria due to septic or aseptic loosening. In addition to clinical standard diagnostics of PJI, the alpha-Defensin test* for the assessment of the qualitative alpha-Defensin in the synovial fluid was performed. The results were compared with the sensitivity and specificity of currently available clinical tests, specifically C-reactive protein (CRP), frozen section, definitive histology, bacteriology and sonication.