The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of 15 patients (mean age 13.6 years (7 to 25)) with a primary sarcoma of the tibial diaphysis who had undergone excision of the affected segment that was then irradiated (90 Gy) and reimplanted with an ipsilateral vascularised fibular graft within it.

The mean follow-up was 57 months (22 to 99). The mean time to full weight-bearing was 23 weeks (9 to 57) and to complete radiological union 42.1 weeks (33 to 55). Of the 15 patients, seven required a further operation, four to obtain skin cover. The mean Musculoskeletal Society Tumor Society functional score at final follow-up was 27 out of 30 once union was complete. The functional results were comparable with those of allograft reconstruction and had a similar rate of complication.

We believe this to be a satisfactory method of biological reconstruction of the tibial diaphysis in selected patients.

Aim

To identify factors leading to the success or failure of extracorporeal irradiation and re-implantation of bone (ECIR).

Aim

To identify patient, tumour or treatment factors that influence outcome in patients with radiation induced sarcoma of bone.

We aimed to identify the incidence, outcome and prognostic factors associated with spindle cell sarcomas of bone (SCSB). We studied 196 patients with a primary non-metastatic tumour treated with the intent to cure. The results were compared with those of osteosarcoma patients treated at our hospital during the same period. The overall incidence of SCSB was 7.8% of all patients with a primary bone sarcoma. The five- and ten-year survival rates were 67.0% and 60.0%, respectively, which were better than those of patients with osteosarcoma treated over the same period. All histological subtypes had similar outcomes. On univariate analysis, factors that were significantly associated with decreased survival were age > 40 years, size > 8 cm, the presence of a pathological fracture, amputation, involved margins and a poor response to pre-operative chemotherapy. Multivariate analyses showed that age > 65 years, amputation and involved margins were all statistically significant prognostic factors. Involved margins and poor response to pre-operative chemotherapy were associated with an increased risk of local recurrence. SCSB has a better prognosis than osteosarcoma when matched for age. Most prognostic factors for osteosarcoma also seem to apply to SCSB. Patients with SCSB should be treated in the same way as patients of the same age with osteosarcoma.

The aim of this study was to identify whether there was any difference in patient, tumour, treatment or outcome characteristics between patients with skeletal or extra-skeletal Ewing’s sarcoma. We identified 300 patients with new primary Ewing’s sarcoma diagnosed between 1980 and 2005 from the centres’ local database. There were 253 (84%) with skeletal and 47 (16%) with extra-skeletal Ewing’s sarcomas. Although patients with skeletal Ewing’s were younger (mean age 16.8 years) than those with extra-skeletal Ewing’s sarcoma (mean age 27.5 years), there was little difference between the groups in terms of tumour stage or treatment. Nearly all the patients were treated with chemotherapy and most had surgery. There was no difference in the overall survival of patients with skeletal (64%) and extra-skeletal Ewing’s sarcoma (61%) (p = 0.85), and this was also the case when both groups were split by whether they had metastases or not.

This large series has shown that the oncological outcomes of Ewing’s sarcoma are related to tumour characteristics and patient age, and not determined by whether they arise in bone or soft tissue.

Of 3000 patients diagnosed with primary malignant bone tumours and treated at our unit over the past 25 years, 234 (7.8%) were considered to be spindle cell sarcomas of bone (ie not osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing’s, chordoma or adamantinoma). We have analyzed their management and outcomes.

The diagnosis of these cases varied with fluctuations in the popularity of conditions such as MFH, fibrosarcoma and leiomyosarcoma with the passage of time. Treatment was with chemotherapy and surgery whenever possible. 36 patients had metastases at diagnosis and 17 had palliative treatment only because of age or infirmity. The most common site was the femur followed by the tibia, pelvis and humerus. The mean age was 45 and the mean tumour size 10.2cm at diagnosis. 25% of patients presented with a pathological fracture. Chemotherapy was used in 70% of patients the most common regime being cisplatin and doxorubicin. 35% of patients having neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a good (> 90% necrosis) response. The amputation rate was 22% and was higher in patients presenting with a fracture and in older patients not having chemotherapy.

With a mean follow up of 8 years the overall survival was 64% at 5 yrs and 58% at 10 yrs. Adverse prognostic factors included the need for amputation, older age and poor response to chemotherapy as well as a pathological fracture at presentation. The few patients with angiosarcoma fared badly but there was no difference in outcomes between patients with other diagnoses.

We conclude that patients with spindle cell sarcomas should be treated similarly to patients with osteosarcoma and can expect comparable outcomes. The histological diagnosis does not appear to predict behaviour.

Of 3000 patients diagnosed with primary malignant bone tumours and treated at our unit over the past 25 years, 234 (7.8%) were considered to be spindle cell sarcomas of bone (ie not osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing’s, chordoma or adamantinoma). We have analyzed their management and outcomes.

The diagnosis of these cases varied with fluctuations in the popularity of conditions such as MFH, fibrosarcoma and leiomyosarcoma with the passage of time. Treatment was with chemotherapy and surgery whenever possible. 36 patients had metastases at diagnosis and 17 had palliative treatment only because of age or infirmity. The most common site was the femur followed by the tibia, pelvis and humerus. The mean age was 45 and the mean tumour size 10.2cm at diagnosis. 25% of patients presented with a pathological fracture. Chemotherapy was used in 70% of patients the most common regime being cisplatin and doxorubicin. 35% of patients having neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a good (> 90% necrosis) response. The amputation rate was 22% and was higher in patients presenting with a fracture and in older patients not having chemotherapy.

With a mean follow up of 8 years the overall survival was 64% at 5 yrs and 58% at 10 yrs. Adverse prognostic factors included the need for amputation, older age and poor response to chemotherapy as well as a pathological fracture at presentation. The few patients with angiosarcoma fared badly but there was no difference in outcomes between patients with other diagnoses.

We conclude that patients with spindle cell sarcomas should be treated similarly to patients with osteosarcoma and can expect comparable outcomes. The histological diagnosis does not appear to predict behaviour.

Aim: To investigate the outcome of our management of patients with giant cell tumour of the sacrum and draw lessons from this.

Method: Retrospective review of medical records and scans for all patients treated at our unit over the past 20 years with a giant cell tumour (GCT) of the sacrum.

Results: Of 517 patients treated at our unit for GCT over the past 20 years, only 9 (1.7%) had a GCT in the sacrum. 6 were female, 3 male with a mean age of 34 (range 15–52). All but two tumours involved the entire sacrum and there was only one purely distal to S3. The mean size was 10cm and the most common symptom was back or buttock pain. Five had abnormal neurology at diagnosis but only one presented with cauda equina syndrome. The first four patients were treated by curettage alone but two patients had intra-operative cardiac arrests and although both survived all subsequent curettages were preceeded by embolization of the feeding vessels. Of 7 patients who had curettage, 3 developed local recurrence but all were controlled with a combination of further embolisation, surgery or radiotherapy. One patient elected for treatment with radiotherapy and another had excision of the tumour distal to S3. All the patients are alive and only two patients have worse neurology than at presentation, one being impotent and one with stress incontinence. All are mobile and active at a follow up between 2 and 21 years.

Conclusion: GCT of the sacrum can be controlled with conservative surgery rather than sacrectomy. Embolisation and curettage are the preferred first option with radiotherapy as a possible adjunct. Spino-pelvic fusion may be needed if the sacrum collapses.

Aim: To identify patient, tumour or treatment factors that influence outcome in patients with radiation induced sarcoma of bone.

Method: A retrospective review of an oncology database supplemented by referral back to original records.

Results: We identified 42 patients who presented to our Unit over a 25 year period with a new sarcoma of bone following previous radiotherapy. The age of the patients at presentation ranged from 10 to 84 years of age (mean: 17 years) and the time interval from previous radiotherapy ranged from 4 to 50 years (median: 14 yrs; mean: 17 years). The median dose of radiotherapy given had been 50 Gy but there was no correlation of radiation dose with time to development of sarcoma. The pelvis was the most common site for development of sarcoma (14 cases) but breast cancer was the most common primary tumour (8 cases). 9 of the patients had metastases at the time of diagnosis of the sarcoma. Osteosacoma was the most common diagnosis (30). Treatment was by surgery and chemotherapy when indicated and 30 of the patients had treatment with curative intent. The survival rate was 41% at 5 years for those treated with curative intent but in those treated palliatively median survival was only 6 months and all had died by one year. The only factor found to be significant for survival was the ability to completely resect the tumour, thus limb sarcomas had a better prognosis (66% survival at 5 years) than central ones (12%)(p=0.009).

Conclusion: Radiation induced sarcoma is a rare complication of radiotherapy. Both surgical and oncological treatment is likely to be compromised by previous treatment the patient has received. Despite this 40% of patients will survive more than 5 years with aggressive modern treatment.

We identified 42 patients who presented to our unit over a 27-year period with a secondary radiation-induced sarcoma of bone. We reviewed patient, tumour and treatment factors to identify those that affected outcome. The mean age of the patients at presentation was 45.6 years (10 to 84) and the mean latent interval between radiotherapy and diagnosis of the sarcoma was 17 years (4 to 50). The median dose of radiotherapy given was estimated at 50 Gy (mean 49; 20 to 66). There was no correlation between radiation dose and the time to development of a sarcoma. The pelvis was the most commonly affected site (14 patients (33%)). Breast cancer was the most common primary tumour (eight patients; 19%). Metastases were present at diagnosis of the sarcoma in nine patients (21.4%). Osteosarcoma was the most common diagnosis and occurred in 30 cases (71.4%). Treatment was by surgery and chemotherapy when indicated: 30 patients (71.4%) were treated with the intention to cure. The survival rate was 41% at five years for those treated with the intention to cure but in those treated palliatively the mean survival was only 8.8 months (2 to 22), and all had died by two years. The only factor found to be significant for survival was the ability to completely resect the tumour. Limb sarcomas had a better prognosis (66% survival at five years) than central ones (12% survival at five years) (p = 0.009).

Radiation-induced sarcoma is a rare complication of radiotherapy. Both surgical and oncological treatment is likely to be compromised by the treatment received previously by the patient.

To assess whether primary spindle cell sarcomas of bone behave like other primary bone sarcomas.

185 patients with primary spindle cell sarcomas of bone, that is non-osteosarcoma, non-chondrosarcoma and non-Ewings sarcoma of bone, were identified from the patient database of the Orthopaedic Oncology Service in Birmingham, UK. This database contains information on over 10, 000 patients treated in Birmingham since 1970 and collected prospectively since 1986.

Spindle cell sarcomas of bone are primary bone tumours which share the histological spindle shaped cells. They are a heterogeneous group including the cytological diagnoses of malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH), spindle cell sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, angiosarcoma and secondary sarcoma.

119 (64%) of the patients were male. The mean age was 47 years with 116 (63%) older than 40 years. Only 6 patients were low grade and 34 had metastases at presentation. 12 patients developed tumours secondarily to other pathology such as Pagets or radiotherapy. The patient’s limb was affected in 155 (84%) of cases with the distal femur being the most common site.

Treatment was with chemotherapy and surgery where indicated. Chemotherapy was with adriamycin and cis-platin most commonly and was neoadjuvant in 75% of those who had it. Of the 150 patients who had surgery, 113 (75%) had limb salvage.

Overall five year survival was 52 %. Survival in patients who had high grade limb tumours, with no metastases at presentation and which weren’t secondary tumours had a five year survival of 60 %. These results are comparable to previous studies looking at similar tumour groups. Good prognostic factors included treatment since 1980, good response (> 90% necrosis) to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, limb tumours, age < 40 and local control. 73% of patients with local recurrence died with a mean survival of 11 months. There was no difference in outcome or behaviour between the different diagnoses although prognosis was slightly better than those of aged matched patients with osteosarcoma.

Spindle cell sarcomas of bone respond in a similar way to, if not better than, osteosarcoma when treated in the same way with chemotherapy and surgery. Consequently this should be the preferred method of management.

Local recurrence (LR) following treatment of a sarcoma is generally accepted to be a poor prognostic sign and an indicator both of inadequate local control as well as of the failure of adjuvant treatment.

Of 2589 patients with non metastatic Ewings, osteo-sarcoma, chondrosarcoma or a soft tissue sarcoma, 316 have developed LR at some stage following initial treatment of their tumour. 120 were already known to have metastases elsewhere when they developed LR or were found to have them at time of restaging but 196 developed LR as the first sign of relapse.

The mean time to development of LR was 24 months and 72% had arisen within the first two years. Overall survival following LR was 25% at 5 years and 20% at 10 yrs. In patients with metastases at the time of LR or who were found to have them at the time of restaging the median survival was 6 months with only 12% being alive at 2 years. In those with LR as first sign of relapse median survival was 3 years with 30% long term survivors. Patients with low grade tumours had a better outcome than those with high grade – 50% being cured by further surgery. Of the high grade tumours without metastases at time of diagnosis relapsed Ewing’s had the worst prognosis with median survival of 8 months compared with 22 months for osteosarcoma, 36 months for STS and 36 months for chondrosarcoma, despite which overall survival was 16% for both Ewing’s and osteo-sarcoma patients but was 30% for chondrosarcoma and STS.

LR following sarcoma surgery is due to a combination of aggressive disease with inadequate surgery and ineffective adjuvant treatment. In isolated LR aggressive further treatment is justified with an outcome similar to that of metastatic disease.

Over a 25-year period we have treated 36 patients with osteosarcoma of the pelvis. Of the tumours, 24 (67%) were primary osteosarcomas and 12 (33%) arose either after irradiation or in association with Paget’s disease. Six patients had a hindquarter amputation and 12 were treated by a limb-salvage procedure with intrapelvic excision.

The five-year survival rate of all the patients with pelvic osteosarcoma was 18%, while for 17 treated by chemotherapy and surgery it was 41%. The prognosis for patients presenting with metastases or with secondary osteosarcoma was appalling and none survived after 29 months. No patient over the age of 50 years when seen initially survived for a year. Youth and a good response to chemotherapy along with complete surgical excision offer the best chance of cure.