To assess the outcome of knee “arthrodesis” using cemented Endo-Model knee fusion nail in failed Total Knee Replacement (TKR) with significant bone loss due to infection. This is a retrospective case study of seven patients with infected TKR and multiple surgeries with significant bone loss.

All patients had antibiotic loaded cement with a temporary K-nail as a first stage procedure to eradicate infection. All seven patients had “arthrodesis” performed using cemented modular Endo-Model Knee Fusion nail (Waldemar Link, Hamburg) by the senior author. Cement was used to hold the stems in the diaphyses and not used around the coupling mechanism. The “arthrodesis” relied entirely on the coupling mechanism which has been shown to have good axial and torsional rigidity by mechanical testing. Outcome was assessed using pre and post Visual Analogue Score (VAS).

Mean age was 72.3 years(62–86). Mean follow up was 39.6 months (7–68). The VAS pain score improved from pre-operative mean score of 7.9 to a postoperative score of 1.5. One patient suffered fracture of femoral cement mantle at 50 months who underwent a technically easy exchange revision. One patient had recurrent infection with distal femoral fracture at 36 months and was revised to distal femoral replacement.

The Endo-Model knee arthrodesis nail restores limb lengths, has good early results in terms of pain relief and provides a stable knee “arthrodesis” in cases where there is significant bone loss and extensor mechanism insufficiency following an infected TKR.

Aim: To assess the outcome of knee arthrodesis using cemented Endo-Model knee fusion nail in failed total knee arthroplasty with significant bone loss due to infection.

Methods: A Retrospective case study of seven patients with infected TKR and multiple surgeries and significant bone loss (Type III AORI classification). All patients had antibiotic loaded cement with a temporary K-nail as a first stage procedure to eradicate infection. All seven patients had arthrodesis performed using cemented modular Endo-Model Knee Fusion nail (Waldemar Link, Hamburg) by senior author (RSJ). The arthrodesis relied on the strong coupling mechanism of the nail and not on bony union, providing pain relief while mainting leg length. Outcomes assessed using pre–and post Visual Analogue Score (VAS) and Oxford knee scores.

Results: Mean age 76.8 years (62–85). Mean follow up 23.7 months (3–42). The mean VAS pain score improved from 7.6 (6.5–8.5) pre-operatively to 1.1 (0–3.2) post-operatively. The mean post-operative Oxford score was 30.3 (27–36). One patient required revision for asceptic loosening. All but one of the patients thought that arthrodesis was preferable to amputation post-operatively.

Conclusion: The Endo-Model knee fusion nail has good early results in terms of pain relief and knee arthrodesis where there is significant bone loss and extensor mechanism insufficiency following an infected total knee replacement.

The treatment of bony defects of the tibia at the time of revision total knee replacement is controversial. The place of compacted morsellised bone graft is becoming established, particularly in contained defects. It has previously been shown that the initial stability of impaction-grafted trays in the contained defects is equivalent to that of an uncemented primary knee replacement. However, there is little biomechanical evidence on which to base a decision in the treatment of uncontained defects. We undertook a laboratory-based biomechanical study comparing three methods of graft containment in segmental medial tibial defects and compared them with the use of a modular metal augment to bypass the defect.

Using resin models of the proximal tibia with medial defects representing either 46% or 65% of the medial cortical rim, repair of the defect was accomplished using mesh, cement or a novel bag technique, after which impaction bone grafting was used to fill the contained defects and a tibial component was cemented in place. As a control, a cemented tibial component with modular metal augments was used in identical defects. All specimens were submitted to cyclical mechanical loading, during which cyclical and permanent tray displacement were determined.

The results showed satisfactory stability with all the techniques except the bone bag method. Using metal augments gave the highest initial stability, but obviously lacked any potential for bone restoration.

Introduction: etiology of late infection after arthroplasty can be difficult to establish. Histology is the gold standard for infection in patients without inflammatory arthritis but diagnosis in inflammatory arthritis depends on culture (Atkins et al). Real-time PCR offers a rapid and direct assessment for staphylococci and enterococci infection but has not been widely assessed.

The aims of this study were

to develop the Roche lightcycler Staphylococcal and Enterococcal PCR kits to facilitate diagnosis of hip and knee prosthetic infections

Methods: uplicate, multiple tissue samples were taken (with separate sterile instruments) at the 1^st stage of revision after informed consent. One set were cultured and results interpreted by the Oxford criteria. The second set were extracted using the Qiagen DNA kit, purified (in-house method) and tested using the Roche lightcycler kits.

Results:53 patients undergoing 2 stage revision for suspected infection were recruited.15 (28.3%) had negative histology and no inflammatory arthritis; 3 with single positive cultures and negative PCR – considered contaminants.

29 patients had non-inflammatory arthritis. 14/18 (77.8%) with positive cultures had staphylococci +/or enterococci isolated and 10 PCR results correlated. The other 11 patients had negative cultures.

9 patients had inflammatory arthritis. Six were culture negative and of the other three, 2 were positive for staphylococci on culture with 1 positive by PCR.

Discussion: Negative staphylococcal PCR correlates with the isolation of staphylococci from only one sample. This agrees with the Oxford criteria that such samples may be considered contaminants. Additional positives detected by staphylococcal PCR alone are rare.

Enterococcal PCR confirmed culture positivity in 2/3 patients. An additional 5 positive PCR’s were obtained from patients’ culture negative for enterococci. It is not clear if these are false positives or more sensitive detection of enterococcal isolation.

Revision hip surgery is becoming increasingly common, 300 procedures being performed in 2001 at our institution. In order to achieve a good outcome bone stock needs to be of good quantity frequently necessitating the use of impaction bone grafting using allograft bone.

Donor bone may frequently take three months before it becomes available for use due to the stringent screening procedure. Donor patients must have a clean bill of health, swabs taken at the time of surgery must obviously demonstrate no growth and blood samples taken at donation and an interval of three months, free from viral infectious diseases. It is thus easy to see the lag from the time of donation to availability and why, with increasing demand, need for allograft bone is rapidly exceeding supply.

We need to look for an alternative supply of human bone allograft.

We have compared the harvest of bone at the time of primary total knee replacement with that of the femoral head by both mass and volume. Sixty consecutive patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty were included in the study, and the masses and volume of the femoral heads compared with that of the total bone cuts in knee arthroplasty. The type of knee replacement used was documented as was whether the femoral head had had a bone block removed. It was found that the mass of femoral heads was 81g, that of knee cuts 95g this is a statistically significant difference; the volume of femoral heads 66ml and that of knee cuts 75ml.

The volumes of bone available from knee arthroplasty cuts are at least comparable femoral heads obtained using hip replacement and could, perhaps, provide a realistic source of bone allograft.

Introduction: Impaction grafting has become a popular technique to revise implants. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Registry reports its use for a third of all revisions. Yet, the technique is seen as demanding. A particular challenge is to achieve sufficient mechanical stability of the construction. This work tests two hypotheses: (1) Graft compaction is an important determinant of mechanical stability, and (2) Graft compaction depends on compaction effort and graft properties. Methods: Impaction grafting surgery was simulated in laboratory experiments using artificial bones with realistic elastic properties (Sawbones, Malmö, Sweden). Bone stock was restored with compacted morsellised graft, and the joint reconstructed with a cemented implant. The implant was loaded cyclically and its migration relative to bone measured. In a second study, morsellised bone of various particle sizes and bone densities, with or without added ceramic bone substitutes, was compacted into a cylindrical mould by impaction of a plunger by a dropping weight. Plunger displacement was measured continuously. Results: Initial mechanical stability of the prostheses correlated most strongly with degree of graft compaction achieved. Graft compaction to similar strength was achieved with less energy for morsellised bone with larger particles, higher density, or bone mixed with ceramic substitutes. Conclusion: Initial mechanical stability of impaction-grafted joint reconstructions depends largely on degree of graft compaction achieved by the surgeon. Compaction depends partly on the vigour of impaction, and partly on graft quality. Higher bone density, larger particle size and mixing with ceramic particles all help to facilitate graft compaction, giving a stronger compacted mass with less effort.

Introduction: There are approximately 50000 hip and knee arthroplasties performed in the UK every year. With this increasing number the prevalence of periprosthetic fractures is also rising. These are often challenging problems with increased morbidity and mortality. The use of cortical strut allografts in periprosthetic fractures was first reported in the early 90’s with favourable results.The aim of this study was to assess the radiological outcome of cortical strut allografts used as the treatment for periprosthetic fractures of the femur in patients presenting to our institution.

Patients & Methods: 17 patients with who had received strut allografts as part of their treatment for a periprosthetic fracture of the femur were identified. 13 fractures were around a total hip replacement and 4 around other femoral implants (2 long stemmed TKR’s and 2 fracture fixation devices).

We undertook a radiological evaluation of this technique. We assessed fracture union and strut allograft incorporation using the radiological criteria of Emerson et al. The procedure was deemed a success if the fracture had united, with evidence of graft incorporation with a stable implant. We also undertook a notes review identifying any risk factors and any previous surgery.

Results: Two patients died in the early post-operative period. 15 patients were available for analysis. The average length of radiographic review was 16 months. 11/15 procedures (73%) were deemed a success. All these showed evidence of graft incorporation which was time dependent. There were four failures. In one patient the struts fractured at two months. There were three cases of deep sepsis, this required amputation in one and excision arthroplasty in two.

Conclusion: Cortical strut allografts are a good technique for the management of periprosthetic fractures of the femur. As well as providing initial support they also become incorporated which improves the host bone stock.