Several risk factors can and should be addressed during first stage or spacer implantation surgery in order to minimize complications. Technical aspects as well as practical tips and pearls to overcome common nuisances such as spacer instability or femoral and acetabular bone loss will be discussed and shown with pictures.

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is one of the most successful procedures in orthopaedics and excellent results are expected in virtually all cases. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) though unusual, is one of the most frequent and challenging complications after TJA. It is the third most common cause of revision in total hip replacement, responsible for up to 15% of all cases.

In the past few years several improvements have been made in the management of an infected total hip prosthesis. Nevertheless it remains a challenging problem for the orthopaedic surgeon. Although numerous studies report favourable outcomes after one-stage revision surgery, two-stage has traditionally been considered as the gold standard for management of chronic infection. Two-stage exchange consists of debridement, resection of infected implants and usually temporary placement of an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer before reimplantation of a new prosthesis.

Spacers can be classified as static or articulating. The goals of using an articulating antibiotic loaded cement spacer are two-fold: to enhance the clearance of infection by local antibiotic therapy and dead-space management while maintaining joint function during treatment thus improving the functional outcome at reimplantation. Still, hip spacer implantation is not innocuous and there are several possible complications.

Going forward, one must consider not just eradicating infection but also the importance of restoring function. In this regard using a mobile spacer adds an element of physiologic motion that both increases patient comfort between stages and facilitates re-implantation surgery. Conversely, mechanical complications are one of the major consequences of this preference. Be that as it may there are ways to minimize these problems. It is the surgeon responsibility to optimize mechanical circumstances as much as possible.

I would like to thank Dr. Ricardo Sousa for his help with this work

Evaluation of the effectiveness of biodegradable bone substitute with high doses of antibiotics in cavitary osteomyelitis and infected nonunions.

The authors evaluated 8 cases, 5 of them related to osteomyelitis with bone sequestration and other 3 regarding infected nonunions. All of them had in common the persistence of infection after antibiotic therapy.

All infections were confirmed by microbiological studies. In all cases the surgeons conducted a thorough surgical debridement and filling of bone defects with Herafill®. Later a tight clinical, analytical and imagiological control was performed.

Five of the cases were a success with simultaneous healing of the bone loss and treatment of the infection. These corresponded to the cases of cavitary osteomyelitis. In the remaining 3 cases, despite infection eradication, union was not achieved and additional surgical procedures were required for definitive treatment of nonunion.

In the treatment of bone infection, use of high doses of antibiotics at the site is a consensus as it allows eradication of the infection with lower systemic effects. With the emergence of biodegradable bone substitutes, the need for a new surgical intervention for their removal can be avoided. Properties of calcium sulfate and calcium carbonate stimulate osteogenesis at the site, allowing their absorption and replacement by bone matrix. These properties make them ideal to usage in cases of cavitary bone defects.

Our experience supports the idea that the use of high doses of antibiotics locally permits remission of the infection. However, when this is implemented through a bone substitute, it is possible to achieve osteogenesis in bony cavities. Nevertheless, when applied to infected nonunions, their role seems to be limited to the eradication of the infection.

We aim to describe the microbiological spectrum and relevant antibiotic susceptibility profile of PJI in our institution over a five-year period(2009–2013) and determine its evolution considering the preceding six years(2003–2008) thus evaluating the adequacy of our empirical antibiotic regimen.

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 96 consecutive PJI (51 hips:45 knees) treated from May 2009-December 2013. Demographics, microbial species and antibiotic susceptibility were recorded. These results were then compared to those previously obtained by studying the 2003–2008 time period.

Infections were polymicrobial in 27 cases(28.1%) and only two cases(2.1%) were culture-negative accounting for a total of 132 different culture results.

S.aureus grew in 37 samples(28.0%) being the most frequently isolated microorganism. Coagulase-negative staphylococci grew in 32 samples(24.2%) and gram negative bacteria in 35 samples(26.5%). Other Gram positive species (most commonly enterococci and streptococci) were isolated in 26 samples(19.7%).

Comparing 2009–2013 to 2003–2008, there was a significant increase of polymicrobial infections – 28% vs. 8%(OR=4.6, 95%CI [1.9–11.3]) and a significant decrease of culture-negative cases – 2% vs. 18%(OR=0.1, 95%CI [0.02–0.4]). It is also noteworthy that the prevalence of gram negative isolates was significantly increased – 26.5% vs. 13.3%(OR=1.3, 95%CI [1.1–1.6]).

Antibiotic susceptibilities study showed a 41.4% methicillin resistance among S.aureus and even higher among coagulase-negative staphylococci isolates(57.7%). This is a not quite significant decrease compared to the earlier period(p=0.10). We also found a high rate antibiotic resistance among gram negative: ampiciline(81.8%), amoxicilin/clavulanate(59.1%), ciprofloxacin(19.2%), aminoglycosides(17%), third generation cephalosporins(14.6%) and even carbapenems(13.6%).

These results show that our sampling protocol has improved considerably as the proportion of culture-negative cases has dramatically decreased. On the other hand this may also help explain the increase in polymicrobial infections. We have no clear explanation for the increase in gram negative bacteria.

Despite the downward trend we still face a very significant proportion of methicillin-resistant staphylococci infections. The antibiotic resistance profile among gram negative bacteria is also worrying. As such we believe a regimen consisting of vancomycin and gram-negative coverage such as aminoglycosides or a third generation cephalosporin is still warranted in our institution.

The goals of the present study are to describe the prevalence of both methicillin sensitive and resistant S.aureus carriage among elective total hip and knee arthroplasty candidates and to evaluate the real impact of preoperatively treating carriers in preventing prosthetic joint infection.

Patients undergoing elective primary THA or TKA at a single institution were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial. S.aureus nasal carriage screening was performed in the outpatient setting and selected carriers underwent a 5-day preoperative treatment of nasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine bathing. All patients were followed regularly in the outpatient clinic. No patients were lost to follow-up at a minimum of one year after surgery. The main outcome of the study was the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection occurring in the first year after surgery including all pathogens and a secondary outcome was defined as infections involving S.aureus bacteria only.

From January 2010 to December 2012, 1305 total joint arthroplasties were performed and 1028 of those were screened. We observed a 22.2% (228/1028) S.aureus colonization rate and only eight patients colonized with MRSA (0.8%). Twenty five cases of prosthetic joint infections were identified with an overall infection rate of 2.4%. S.aureus was involved in 14 cases. PJI rate in S.aureus carriers was 3.9% (9/228), which was not significantly higher than the 2.0% (16/800) found among non carriers. Treated and untreated carriers infection rate also showed no significant differences – 3.4% (3/89) vs. 4.3% (6/139). Multivariable analysis substantiates ASA≥ 3 (OR=3.42, 95% CI=1.51 – 7.74) and duration of surgery above the 75th percentile (OR=2.74, 95% CI=1.22 – 6.16) as independent predictors of PJI but not S.aureus carrier state. We obtained similar results when considering infection involving S.aureus bacteria only.

Of the 14 cases where S.aureus was present in PJI, only five were carriers preoperatively. Of those five cases, one was an untreated MSSA carrier that ultimately got an MRSA infection.

Our results show no clear benefit in screening and decolonizing S.aureus nasal carriers before total joint arthroplasty. There seems to be a lack of causal relation between nasal S.aureus and PJI pathogen as most of S.aureus PJI seems to have an exogenous source.

Background

Previous data from our institution show that more than half of all prosthetic joint infections are due to S. aureus. A significant proportion of these bacteria may have an endogenous source. Detecting and treating asymptomatic S. aureus nasal carriers preoperatively has been shown to reduce the risk of infection.

Radial osteotomy is currently advocated for patients with Lichtman’s stages II and IIIA of Kienböck’s disease; its place in the treatment of patients with stage IIIB disease remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the medium-term results of this procedure and to compare the outcome in patients with stage IIIB disease and those with earlier stages (II and IIIA). A total of 18 patients (18 osteotomies) were evaluated both clinically and radiologically at a mean follow-up of 10.3 years (4 to 18). Range of movement, grip strength and pain improved significantly in all patients; the functional score (Nakamura Scoring System (NSSK)) was high and self-reported disability (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) was low at the final follow-up in all patients evaluated. Patients with stage IIIB disease, however, had a significantly lower grip strength, lower NSSK scores and higher disability than those in less advanced stages. Radiological progression of the disease was not noted in either group, despite the stage. Radial osteotomy seems effective in halting the progression of disease and improving symptoms in stages II, IIIA and IIIB. Patients with less advanced disease should be expected to have better clinical results.

Introduction: Prosthetic joint infections are a growing burden. Since we felt that we were far from the optimistic results recently published, we decided to find out the reality in our department. The goals were to determine:

The rate of infections in primary and revision surgery (hip and knee)

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of all patients that underwent surgical treatment due to infected hip or knee prosthetic joint between 1st July 2001 and 31st December 2007.

Results: Since the majority of infections (67%) presented in the first two years after surgery, we determined the rate of infections taking in to consideration a minimum two years follow-up. We calculated a 1.8% (12/678) rate of infection for primary total hip and 3.3% (20/588) for primary total knee arthroplasty. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Revision hip surgery had a 5.4% (15/243) infection rate and revision knee surgery revealed an even higher rate of 10.3% (4/42). The difference between primary and revision surgery was statistically significant both for hip and knee.

Considering an infection free arthroplasty as the goal, the overall success rate of treatment was under 48% (30/69). The success of treating infections with debridement and retention of components was even lower (29%). Further analysis revealed a higher success of this approach (45%) when considering more appropriate candidates (short term infections). An interesting statistically significant difference was found favoring this approach in the knee.

Two-stage revision strategy was successful in achieving revision arthroplasty in 43% (20/46) of the cases. Most patients were never considered candidates to the second stage procedure. Knee joint and resistant microorganisms were found to be predictors of bad prognosis.

There was a 90% (18/20) survival rate of revision arthroplasties after two years average follow-up. There were only 2 cases of relapsing infection both controlled without prosthetic removal.

Conclusion: Our results compare poorly with the latest published data from different centers. They led us to implement new prophylactic measures as well as review our diagnostic and treatment options.

Background: Braquial plexus injuries are a major indication for shoulder arthrodesis today. Numerous investigations have addressed the optimal position of the extremity for shoulder arthrodesis, and there are still numerous opinions on the ideal position. The present consensus appears to favor less abduction and forward flexion and more internal rotation.

Purposes: Our main goal is to determine the most favorable position for arthrodesis regarding upper limb function and prevalence of periscapular pain. Secondarily we describe the fusion and complications rate as well as patient satisfaction.

Materials and Methods: Between 1997 and 2008 the authors performed a total of 19 shoulder arthrodesis using a pelvic reconstruction plate in patients with braquial plexus injuries. Six were lost to follow-up leaving a total of 11 men and two women with a mean age of 46 years available for review. At a mean follow-up of 101 months [13–149] patients were evaluated clinically using predetermined functional parameters (hand-to-mouth, brachiothoracic grip, etc) and the visual analog pain scale. DASH score and radiological studies were also performed. Three patients that presented no active elbow flexion were excluded of the functional results analysis.

Results: The mean fusion position found was 20° abduction, 32° forward flexion and 44° internal rotation. Abduction ≥ 25° relates to better function as judged by a better hand-to-mouth and brachiothoracic grip ratio as well as a better DASH score (38.8 vs. 45.4) but is also unfortunately related to higher periscapular pain prevalence (VAS pain 3.75 vs. 1.38). Forward flexion ≤ 30° also relates to slightly higher periscapular pain prevalence (VAS pain 2.7 vs. 1.7) and a better DASH score (39.5 vs. 47.7). Exaggerated internal rotation seems to have a negative influence on the functional outcome. Although relating to a surprisingly better DASH score (39.7 vs. 44.9), none of the three patients presenting with internal rotation over 45° was able to reach the mouth with his/her hand. Fusion was obtained in 12 patients. Major complications included one pseudarthrosis, one malpositioning of the extremity that forced a revision surgery to increase internal rotation and one humeral shaft fracture treated conservatively. All but one patient (including those with no active elbow flexion) were satisfied/very satisfied with the final outcome.

Discussion: Our results suggest abduction around 25° and forward flexion of no more than 30° are needed. Higher abduction and lower forward flexion values although relating to better function do so at the expense of more periscapular pain. We agree with the present trend towards increasing internal rotation but found that it should not exceed 45°.

Chondrosarcoma is the second most frequent primary malignant tumour of bone, representing approximately 25% of all primary osseous neoplasms. Chondrosarcomas are a group of tumours with highly diverse features and behavior patterns, ranging from slow-growing non-metastasizing lesions to highly aggressive metastasizing sarcomas. As radio and quimio-resistant tumours, the surgery constitutes the unique chance of cure. Nowadays, besides the curative intention, the reconstructive surgery is also a priority in order to save the limb and optimize the function.

This case report is about a young woman, of 24 years old, with hip-related pain and a large mass in the left pelvis. The imagiologic study showed a large mass of about 8 cm of large diameter, starting at the anterior wall of the acetabulum, involving the pubic arcs and with matrix calcification. The core needle biopsy confirmed the presence of a chondrosarcoma, staged as a IIB of Enneking.

Because of its size and localization the limb salvage surgery has been a challenge. The surgery included a broad approach of the left hemipelvis, with wide excision of the tumour, reconstruction of the abdominal wall with a propylene prothesis and reconstruction of the hemipelvis with a “custom-made” prothesis with preservation of the femoral neurovascular bundle. The patient started to walk with total bearing after three months and had a normal gait and a nearly normal life during eleven months. Fifteen months after the surgery lung metastasis and local recurrence were diagnosed and she died six months after.

Conclusion: The surgery is our unique weapon in the “combat” against the chondrosarcoma. The reconstructive surgery must be a concern to give to our patients the best functional result and quality of life.

Primary synovial chondromatosis, defined by Jaffe (1951), is a rare, benign arthropathy, of unknown aetiology, distinguished by the chondroid metaplasia of the synovial membrane of the joint, bursa or tendon sheath, which leads to the formation of loose bodies, usually intra-articular. It is characteristically monoarticular and the knee, hip and elbow are the joints most commonly affected. The shoulder is a rare localisation and the extra-articular involvement even rarer, with only few cases presented in the literature.

The diagnosis is possibilited by the clinical examination and by the confirmation of the presence of multiple intra-articular loose bodies by roentgenographic studies and magnetic resonance (MR). The treatment is always surgical. Malignant degeneration of synovial chondromatosis into chondrosarcoma is described, although rare.

We report an exceptionally rare case of synovial osteochondromatosis of the shoulder with combined intra and extra-articular involvement in a 28 years old female patient, former athlete. She presented with a five-year history of shoulder pain and slight limitation of motion. Radiographic examination and magnetic resonance imaging led us to the diagnosis of synovial chondromatosis of the shoulder. The patient underwent arthroscopic removal of the intra-articular loose bodies and partial synovectomy. The subscapularis recess was then identified through an anterior deltopectoral incision and multiple loose bodies were removed from within.

Primary synovial chondromatosis of the shoulder is rare (5% of the cases) and the involvement of the extra-articular shoulder site is even rarer. Bloom and colleagues reported ten cases involving the shoulder in a meta-analysis of 191 synovial chondromatosis cases.

The arthroscopic removal of the loose bodies combined with the partial sinovectomy has demonstrated efficacy and low recurrence rates, allowing excellent visualization of the joint, decreased morbidity and early functional return. Nevertheless, we think that this approach may become insufficient when the extra-articular involvement is verified.