40 linked total elbow replacements were inserted into 35 patients over a 12-year period. The mean age was 67. 3 years, (range 48 to 87 years) and the mean follow up 50 months (range 8 to 134 months). Each patient had undergone at least 1 operation prior to the index arthroplasty (range 1 to 10). 27 elbows were flail and 13 unstable due to previous failed total elbow replacements in 23, gross bony erosion due to rheumatoid arthritis in 9, distal humeral non-union in 6 and Charcot joints due to syringomyelia in 2.

A Coonrad Morrey sloppy hinge prosthesis was implanted in 25 elbows and a snap-fit Souter Strath-clyde prosthesis in 15. The technique included preservation of the triceps mechanism and early mobilisation in most cases. At review 38 elbows had no or mild pain, 2 moderate, and no patient had severe pain. All patients achieved a functional range of movement. There was no linkage failure of any implant.

Complications included revision for aseptic loosening of one humeral and one ulnar component, debridement for infection in one and curettage and bone grafting of a cement granuloma in one. One patient with a Charcot joint developed a non-union after failure of plating and grafting of a periprosthetic fracture at the tip of the humeral component. In addition six had delayed wound healing, two ulnar nerve symptoms and two triceps weakness.

In conclusion, a linked elbow replacement can reliably provide stability, mobility and pain relief in a flail or unstable joint allowing the hand to be positioned in space and therefore the function of the limb is dramatically improved. This method is especially appropriate in elderly frail patients.

We present a prospective review of the outcome of 76 Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasties carried out in 59 patients between 1989 and 1995. At a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, 62 knees in the 48 patients were reviewed; 11 patients (14 knees) had died. None was lost to follow-up.

The clinical outcome using the Bristol Knee Scoring system was satisfactory in 45% of the cases. Maltracking of the patella, resulting in lateral tilt, subluxation and polyethylene wear, was the most common complication (32%). Revision surgery was carried out in 21 knees (28%) giving a cumulative survival rate of 65% (confidence interval (CI) 49 to 77) at eight years. The survival rate for revision and moderate pain was 48% (CI 36 to 59) at six years. Progression of arthritis was seen in seven cases (9%). In five of these (6.5%), the symptoms were severe enough to need revision surgery. Due to the high proportion of unsatisfactory results, we have discontinued the use of this prosthesis.

We randomised 102 knees suitable for a unicompartmental replacement to receive either a unicompartmental (UKR) or total knee replacement (TKR) after arthrotomy. Both groups were well matched with a predominance of females and a mean age of 69 years.

Patients in the UKR group showed less perioperative morbidity, but regained knee movement more rapidly and were discharged from hospital sooner.

At five years, two UKRs and one TKR had been revised; another TKR was radiologically loose. All other knees appeared to be clinically and radiologically sound.

Pain relief was good in both groups but the number of knees able to flex ≥ 120° was significantly higher in the UKR group (p < 0.001) and there were more excellent results in this group.

Our findings have shown that UKR gives better results than TKR and that this superiority is maintained for at least five years.