There has been a marked increase in the number of hip arthroscopies performed over the past 16 years, primarily in the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Insights into the pathoanatomy of FAI, and high-level evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of arthroscopy in the management of FAI, have fuelled this trend. Arthroscopic management of labral tears with repair may have superior results compared with debridement, and there is now emerging evidence to support reconstructive options where repair is not possible. In situations where an interportal capsulotomy is performed to facilitate access, data now support closure of the capsule in selective cases where there is an increased risk of postoperative instability. Preoperative planning is an integral component of bony corrective surgery in FAI, and this has evolved to include computer-planned resection. However, the benefit of this remains controversial. Hip instability is now widely accepted, and diagnostic criteria and treatment are becoming increasingly refined. Instability can also be present with FAI or develop as a result of FAI treatment. In this annotation, we outline major current controversies relating to decision-making in hip arthroscopy for FAI. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to prepare a scoping review to investigate the use of biologic therapies in the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries in professional and Olympic athletes. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O’Malley frameworks were followed. A three-step search strategy identified relevant published primary and secondary studies, as well as grey literature. The identified studies were screened with criteria for inclusion comprising clinical studies evaluating the use of biologic therapies in professional and Olympic athletes, systematic reviews, consensus statements, and conference proceedings. Data were extracted using a standardized tool to form a descriptive analysis and a thematic summary.Aims
Methods
Cam type femoro-acetabular impingement is defined by a reduced femoral head-neck offset and by excessive bone at antero-lateral femoral head-neck junction. Reconstruction of the femoral head-neck offset by removing the femoral bony prominence is a common treatment for cam type impingement. In many cases, the goal of this treatment is to make the antero-lateral head-neck offset symmetrical to the postero-lateral offset. However, guidelines for bony removal are not well established. The objective of this study is to examine if the antero-lateral and postero-lateral femoral offsets are symmetrical in normal healthy hips. CT analyses of the anatomic geometry of the femoral head and neck were performed. Hip joints with any evidence of cartilage defects and impingement were excluded. Eight cadaveric hips (3 right and 5 left hips) were examined. The average age of the cadavers was 65.1±15.1 years. A peripheral QCT scanner was used which provided 0.2 x 0.2 x 2 mm resolution. To improve the resolution of the final result, each hip joint was scanned in three different scanning directions (sagittal, coronal, and axial scanning planes). A custom imaging fixture was built to position a joint sample in three different scanning planes and a custom irrigation system supplied saline to protect the sample from dehydration. A custom segmentation program was developed to delineate the bony contours of the femoral head and neck in a fully automated manner. The segmentation data from the three differenent imaging planes were merged and a 3D solid model of each hip joint was created. The prominence of the femoral head was determined by the distance of the 3D head from an ideal sphere fitted into the 3D model. All the femoral heads were found to be asymmetric. Prominence of posteromedial femoral head averaged 0.105 mm more than the antero-medial femoral head. The antero-lateral head-neck junction was also found to be more prominent than the postero-lateral head-neck junction by an average of 1.09 mm. Asymmetry in the femoral head and femoral head-neck junction was a general finding in normal hip joints. The conventional approach of symmetric reconstruction of femoral head-neck junction may result in unnecessary removal of bone at the antero-lateral head-neck junction and potentially increase the risk of femoral neck fracture.
