This article presents a unified clinical theory
that links established facts about the physiology of bone and homeostasis,
with those involved in the healing of fractures and the development
of nonunion. The key to this theory is the concept that the tissue
that forms in and around a fracture should be considered a specific
functional entity. This ‘bone-healing unit’ produces a physiological
response to its biological and mechanical environment, which leads
to the normal healing of bone. This tissue responds to mechanical
forces and functions according to Wolff’s law, Perren’s strain theory
and Frost’s concept of the “mechanostat”. In response to the local
mechanical environment, the bone-healing unit normally changes with
time, producing different tissues that can tolerate various levels
of strain. The normal result is the formation of bone that bridges
the fracture – healing by callus. Nonunion occurs when the bone-healing
unit fails either due to mechanical or biological problems or a
combination of both. In clinical practice, the majority of nonunions
are due to mechanical problems with instability, resulting in too
much strain at the fracture site. In most nonunions, there is an
intact bone-healing unit. We suggest that this maintains its biological
potential to heal, but fails to function due to the mechanical conditions.
The theory predicts the healing pattern of multifragmentary fractures
and the observed morphological characteristics of different nonunions.
It suggests that the majority of nonunions will heal if the correct
mechanical environment is produced by surgery, without the need
for biological adjuncts such as autologous bone graft. Cite this article:
It is established good practice that joint replacements should have regular follow-up and for the past seven years at the North Hampshire Hospital a local joint register has been used for this purpose and we compare this with results of the Swedish and UK national registries. Since March 1999, all primary and revision knee arthroplasties performed at North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke have been prospectively recorded onto a database set up by one of the senior authors (JMB). Data from patients entered in the first six years of the register were analysed. All patients have at least one year clinical and radiological review then a minimum of yearly postal follow-up. As of 31/12/2006, 2854 knee replacement procedures had been performed under the care of 13 consultants. OA was the most common diagnosis in over 75% of knees. 5.2% of patients had died and 4.6% were lost to follow-up. Our revision burden was 3.5% and we had a revision rate of 1.4% for primary total knee replacements. Audit of data for revisions and patello-femoral replacements has enabled us to change our practices. Mean length of stay was 7.2 days for primary total knee arthroplasty versus 4.0 days for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and 5.4 days for patellofemoral replacement and mean flexion at discharge was 88.4, 93.7 and 88.7 degrees respectively. WOMAC and Oxford scores at 2 years had improved from a mean of 52 and 21 pre-operatively to 74 and 39 respectively for primary total knee arthroplasty. Our costs are estimated at approximately £35 per patient for their lifetime on the register. Compared to other registries:
Our dataset is more complete and comprehensive Our costs are less All patients have a unique identifier (at least 19% of UKNJR data is anonymous) Our audit loops have been closed
