Aims

The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence of previous lumbar surgery in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to investigate their patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) one year post-operatively.

Infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a devastating complication. With an ageing population and increased demands for THA, prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is expected to become an even greater problem in the future. In late PJI a one- or two-stage revision procedure is most often used. Factors determining the outcomes are not fully understood and there is controversy in the choice between the two methods. The, two-stage method in infected THA is regarded as more resource demanding and is associated with a high distress in the patients.

The aim of this study was to compare the risk for second revision (re-revision) between one- and two-stage revision.

During 1979–2015, 1659 first-time revisions performed due to infection were reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Two-stage revision was the most common procedure (n=1255). Risk for a re-revision was compared between one- and two-stage revision using Cox-regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis and method of fixation. The primary end-point was a re-revision regardless of cause. Aseptic loosening, infection, and dislocation necessitating re-revision were used as secondary outcomes.

There was no difference in risk of re-revision regardless of cause (HR (one-stage/two-stage)=0.9, 95% C.I.=0.7–1.1, p=0.3), re-revision due to aseptic loosening (HR=1.1, 95% C.I.=0.7–1.6, p=0.7) or re-revision due to infection (HR=0.7, 95% C.I.=0.5–1.1, p=0.2). Dislocation necessitating a re-revision was less common in the one-stage group (HR=0.4, 95% C.I.=0.2–0.9, p=0.03).

In this analysis re-revision rates were similar in the two groups. When analysed specifically for infection, risk of re-revision did not differ between one and two stage revision. Our findings confirm recent systematic reviews on the matter.

This observational study supports increased utilisation of the one-stage approach. However prospective randomized studies are needed to validate these findings.

During the last decade primary total hip arthroplasty surgery (THA) has increased with 30% in Sweden. Current law guarantees the patient a right to treatment within 90 days. The public health system has had difficulties meeting the increasing demand. Therefore, in 2012 a systematic review of the patients planned for THA was initiated at Sahlgrenska University Hospital's joint replacement unit. In late 2013 the value-based health care (VBHC) management was introduced in our unit.

In 2012 a systematic approach based on the Fast-Track concept was implemented in the joint replacement unit. In 2013 a workgroup consisting of health care professionals involved in the treatment of THA patients was created to improve chosen outcome parameters.

During 2011–2016 the number of elective THA has increased from 317 to 486. The cost per patient has decreased from 75,000 SEK to 65,000 SEK. Length of stay has decreased from 5.9 days to 2.5 days. Satisfaction with outcome of surgery one year after THA increased from 76% to 88%. The number of adverse events decreased from 29% to 11%. Number of re-operations within 2 years decreased from 2,7% to 1,9%.

Fast-Track and VBHC management was initially received with modest enthusiasm in our unit, and was regarded as means to increase production whilst possibly endanger the well-being of the patients. By using continuous feedback using the data collected it was possible to effectively communicate to patients and caregivers that the patients benefitted from the implementation.

VBHC primary aim is to improve patient outcomes and synergetically improve cost and process measurements. This should be appealing to both caregivers and administrators.

Focusing on improvement of outcomes after THA combined with VBHC management has contributed to improvement in quality of care and availability of treatment whilst decreasing cost per patient.

Aims

Compared with primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), revision surgery can be challenging. The cement-in-cement femoral revision technique involves removing a femoral component from a well-fixed femoral cement mantle and cementing a new stem into the original mantle. This technique is widely used and when carried out for the correct indications, is fast, relatively inexpensive and carries a reduced short-term risk for the patient compared with the alternative of removing well-fixed cement. We report the outcomes of this procedure when two commonly used femoral stems are used.

Introduction

When following patients with metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements, current evidence suggests that orthopaedic surgeons should avoid reliance on any single investigative tool. In 2014, guidelines for stratifying patients with MoM hip replacement into groups of low, medium, and high risk of failure based on multiple criteria were published. However, such risk stratification guidelines can be difficult to interpret due to the numerous risk factors related to MoM hip replacements. This is especially true for patients with various (high and low) risk levels for different criteria within the guidelines.

The first purpose of this study was to assess if a scoring system can be applied to the current MoM guidelines. The second purpose was to test, using this scoring system, how the contemporary guidelines would classify a cohort of patients with a recalled MoM hip replacement system.

Introduction

In vitro studies showed that the anti-oxidative properties of vitamin E stabilize free radicals while retaining the mechanical strength of UHMWPE. The purpose was to evaluate vitamin E diffused polyethylene (VEPE) wear and stability of femoral components using RSA. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated to determine the clinical outcome at 5 years.

Introduction

Dislocation as a primary cause of revision has been on the increase in Sweden (14% in 2014). The increasing use of Dual Mobility cups (DMC) could well be explained by the increased revision burden due to dislocation, patients undergoing revision having increased comorbidities and reports that dual articular cup designs reduce the risk of dislocation. The aim of this study was to analyze the change in utilization pattern of the dual articular designs used in acetabular revision surgery in Sweden. The short-term survival of DMC was compared to traditional designs.

Aims

Hemiarthroplasty of the hip is usually carried out through either a direct lateral or posterior approach. The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine any differences in patient-reported outcomes between the two surgical approaches.

The limitations and benefits of patient-reported outcome measures, in defining the merits of arthroplasty surgery, are discussed.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:578–81.

The effects of surgical approach in total hip replacement on health-related quality of life and long-term pain and satisfaction are unknown. From the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, we extracted data on all patients that had received a total hip replacement for osteoarthritis through either the posterior or the direct lateral approach, with complete pre- and one-year post-operative Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). A total of 42 233 patients met the inclusion criteria and of these 4962 also had complete six-year PROM data. The posterior approach resulted in an increased mean satisfaction score of 15 (sd 19) vs 18 (sd 22) (p <  0.001) compared with the direct lateral approach. The mean pain score was 13 (sd 17) vs 15 (sd 19) (p < 0.001) and the proportion of patients with no or minimal pain was 78% vs 74% (p < 0.001) favouring the posterior approach. The patients in the posterior approach group reported a superior mean EQ-5D index of 0.79 (sd 0.23) vs 0.77 (sd 0.24) (p < 0.001) and mean EQ score of 76 (sd 20) vs 75 (sd 20) (p < 0.001). All observed differences between the groups persisted after six years follow-up. Although PROMs after THR in general are very good regardless of surgical approach, the results indicate that some patients operated by the direct lateral approach report an inferior outcome compared with the posterior approach. The large number of procedures and the seemingly sustained differences make it likely these findings are clinically relevant.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:590–6.

In medical research and among health-care providers there has been a marked shift to a focus on patient-reported outcome (PRO) and how it is measured and analysed. In this study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register we present the development and results of a nationwide, prospective, observational follow-up programme including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The programme started in 2002 and has gradually expanded to include all units performing THA surgery in Sweden. The self-administered PROM protocol comprises the EQ-5D instrument, the Charnley categorization and visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. These current analyses include 34 960 THAs with complete pre- and one-year postoperative questionnaires.

Patients eligible for THA generally report low health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and suffer from pain. One year post-operatively the mean EQ-5D index increased from 0.41 to 0.78 (p<0.001) which is above the level of an age- and gender-matched population. Pain was reduced from mean VAS 62 to 14 (p<0.001). Females, younger patients and those with Charnley category C reported lower EQ-5D index pre-operatively than males, older patients and Charnley A or B, respectively, did (all p<0.001). In a multivariable regression analysis Charnley category C, male gender and higher age were associated with less improvement in HRQoL (p<0,001). Patients' response rates to the Registry was 86% pre-operatively and 90% one year post-operatively.

Nationwide implementation of a PROM programme requires a structured organization and effective IT solutions. The continuous collection of PROs permits local and national improvement work and allows for further health-economic evaluation.

This randomised methodological study sought to test the reliability of an Internet questionnaire and investigate the differences in response rates between traditional pen-and-paper questionnaires and Internet questionnaires for measuring patient-reported outcome after total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery.

From the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, 2 400 patients were chosen at random but stratified by age, sex and diagnosis for inclusion in a four-year follow-up using the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) tool EQ-5D and visual analogue scales for pain and satisfaction. The patients were randomized to answer the follow-up model protocol either via a password-protected Internet questionnaire or via a mailed pen-and-paper questionnaire.

A reliability test for the Internet follow-up instrument showed adequate correlation. However, the Internet group and the pen-and-paper group differed significantly (p<0.001) with a 92% response rate in the latter and 49% in the former. Adjusted to the normal age distribution of the THA population, the Internet response rate was 34%.

The patient-administered Internet questionnaire alone does not give a sufficient response rate in the THA population to replace the pen-and-paper questionnaire. However, the system is reliable and could be used for measuring patient- reported outcome if supplemented with traditional pen-and-paper questionnaires for Internet non-respondents. It is expected that this answer procedure will soon predominate in view of the general development of Internet functions. Register work may then become less resource-consuming and the results may be analysed in real time.

We present the development and results of a nationwide, prospective, observational follow-up programme including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. The programme started in 2002 and has gradually expanded to include all units performing total hip replacement in Sweden. The self-administered PROMs protocol comprises the EQ-5D instrument, the Charnley class categorisation and visual analogue scales for pain and satisfaction. These current analyses include 34 960 total hip replacements with complete pre- and one-year post-operative questionnaires.

Patients eligible for total hip replacement generally report low health-related quality of life and suffer from pain. One year post-operatively the mean EQ-5D index increased to above the level of an age- and gender-matched population, with a considerable reduction of pain (p < 0.001). Females, younger patients and those with Charnley category C reported a lower EQ-5D index pre-operatively than males, older patients and Charnley category A or B, respectively (all p < 0.001). In a multivariable regression analysis Charnley category C, male gender and higher age were associated with less improvement in health-related quality of life (p < 0.001).

Nationwide implementation of a PROMs programme requires a structured organisation and effective data capture. Patients’ response rates to the Registry are good. The continuous collection of PROMs permits local and national improvement work and allows for further health-economic evaluation.

Introduction: In the Swedish health care system waiting time for THR surgery has been unacceptable long. There are several hip disease related circumstances that generates costs for the society and the patient. In order to perform complete health economic analysis these costs have to be assessed.

Patients and Material: Prior to THR surgery, 3500 patients from 20 hospitals were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding cost generating events related to the hip disease. Individual data on waiting time were collected. Follow-up questionnaire was administered one year postoperatively.

Preliminary results: 2712 patients answered the pre-operative questionnaire. The sample was representative; mean age 69 years, 67% > 65 years (retirement age). Mean waiting time for orthopaedic consultation was 176 days and for surgery 312 days. 82% used any medication due to the hip disease. Among the non-retired patients 33% were on sick leave and 25% were on disability pension. 4% reported home-help service, 9% transportation service for disabled, and 46% had any home modification. 26% required help from relatives in various extents. The costs related to hip disease amounts to 8 000 Euro one year prior to surgery. Productivity loss constitutes 72% of total costs, health care costs 13%, municipal costs 6%, medication 1,5% and costs for relative care-taking 7,5%.

Discussion: Productivity loss constitutes the principal cost for hip disease in patients eligible for THR surgery. One year on the waiting list costs equals the surgery cost. The waiting time for orthopaedic consultation and subsequent surgery is unacceptable long. Baseline cost data is important for further adequate health economic analyses.

Objective: The Charnley grading system (A, B, C) has previously been shown to be a valid predictor concerning outcome after joint replacement surgery. In this study we hypothesized that anxiety/depression, one of five dimensions in the health related quality of life measurement tool EQ-5D, could predict the outcome after total hip replacement surgery.

Methods: Data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 6 158 patients with primary osteoarthritis were analysed. To examine the association of anxiety with respect to the outcome of pain (VAS) and satisfaction (VAS) a general linear regression model was used.

A subgroup of 481 patients in the Western Region of Sweden with complete data on individual CPP (cost per patient) was selected for the health economic analysis.

Results: The preoperative EQ-5D anxiety/depression dimension was a strong predictor for pain relief, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness with surgery. Patients with comorbidity (Charnley category C) had a significant worse outcome with regards to pain relief, satisfaction and EQ-5D index scores than patients in Charnley category A and B (p< 0.001). Females generally had worse outcome scores than males in all three outcome measurements (p< 0.001).

Conclusion: Orthopaedic surgeons involved with the care of patients eligible for THR surgery should be alert to the fact that mental health may influence pain-experience and HRQoL outcome. Appropriate assessment of mental health may enable us to modify the approach in which we manage these patients, in order to optimize the outcome following joint replacement surgery.

Introduction: Many patients eligible for hip arthroplasty suffer from bilateral hip disease with indication for bilateral total hip replacement (BTHR). Traditionally two-stage BTHR is far more common than one-stage procedure due to the risk of complications. However, most studies are in favour of one-stage BTHR in the healthy and young people. This study was designed to further analyse mortality, outcome, complications and cost-effectiveness after one-stage BTHR surgery.

Patients and Methods: In this prospective matched control study we examined 32 patients with BTHR hybrid surgery. The control group of 32 patients with unilateral hybrid THR was derived from Sahlgrenska University hospital. The follow up time was 1 year. Medical records, cost per patient database, records from Swedish Social Insurance Administration and HRQoL outcome measurements from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register were used for the analyses.

Mortality data from the Register regarding all 950 patients with one-stage BTHR surgery during the period 1992 until 2005 were compared to those 2577 who had had a twostage procedure with less than six months between the operations.

Preliminary Results: There were no major differences in complications. The intraoperative bleeding was higher in the BTHR patients and they required more blood transfusion. Length of hospital stay was in average 10,2 days for the one-stage BTHR group and 7,6 days for the unilateral group. Preoperative EQ-5D index was 0,14 in the BTHR group and 0,31 in the control group. Mean EQ-5D gain after 1 year was 0,77 and 0,40 respectively. Hospital costs were only 60% higher in the one-stage BTHR group. Among the employed patients there were no differences in days of sick pay and cost of sick pay in the two groups. Among the 950 subjects with one-stage BTHR surgery, the 90 day mortality was 0,32% compared to 0,42% in the group of 2577 patients with two-stage procedure.

Discussion: In healthy patients with bilateral hip disease requiring bilateral arthroplasty one-stage BTHR is highly cost-effective and safe. There is even lower 90 day mortality for the onestage operated subjects in the register but this is probably due to a natural selection of younger and healthier patients. The one-stage procedure reduces the total time of rehabilitation which is of particular importance for people in working age. Cautiously estimated, performing another 100 one-stage BTHR per year instead of two-stage procedure would save 16–20 million SEK yearly in Sweden.

In this study we hypothesised that anxiety/depression, one of five dimensions in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurement tool EQ-5D, could predict outcome after total hip replacement surgery.

Pre-operative and one-year post-operative data from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, including 6158 patients with primary osteoarthritis of the hip, were analysed. In order to examine the association between anxiety and outcome with respect to pain and satisfaction an analysis of covariance was used.

The pre-operative EQ-5D anxiety/depression dimension was a strong predictor for pain relief and patient satisfaction (p < 0.001).

Orthopaedic surgeons involved in the care of patients eligible for total hip replacement surgery should be aware that mental health may influence post-operative pain and HRQoL. An appropriate assessment of mental health may enable a modification in the way these patients are managed in order to optimise the outcome after joint replacement surgery.