header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIII | Pages 38 - 38
1 Sep 2012
Ramaskandhan JR Bettinson K Siddique M
Full Access

This project highlights the red flags in postoperative rehabilitation of total ankle replacement (TAR) patients managed with two different postoperative rehab regimes.

20 TAR patients were recruited for a pilot RCT between 2008 and 2011; they were randomized to 2 groups (immobilisation in a below knee plaster cast for 6 weeks vs. early mobilisation following TAR); all patients underwent a graded outpatient Physiotherapy program until 12 weeks postoperatively. Assessments included questionnaires, complications, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) done preoperatively, 3 and 6 months after surgery

Results

20 TARs for OA (13) and PTOA (7) took part in the trial. There were 10 patients in each arm of the study. Mean age 61.2 years; mean BMI was 29.4. Of the plaster group, there was 1 incidence of fracture medial malleolus (MM) at 6 weeks after removal of plaster cast, 1 fracture MM at 5 months following walking on the beach, 1 fracture (MM) after completion of outpatient physiotherapy session, and 1 fracture MM of unknown reason at 1 year. Of the early mobilisation group, there was 1 intraoperative fracture of tibia (treated conservatively); 1 fracture MM 6 weeks post-op; 2 fracture MM at 8 weeks post-op. All patients had good clinical outcomes at successive follow up assessments.

Conclusion

These results highlights the need for considering a lighter exercise regime, and re-evaluating patient lifestyle, return to recreational activities and feedback on home exercise programs during planning and execution of each phase of postoperative rehabilitation programs to aid prevention of early fractures in patients following TAR.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 93-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1602 - 1609
1 Dec 2011
Malviya A Ramaskandhan JR Bowman R Hashmi M Holland JP Kometa S Lingard E

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible benefit of large-head metal-on-metal bearing on a stem for primary hip replacement compared with a 28 mm diameter conventional metal-on-polyethylene bearing in a prospective randomised controlled trial. We investigated cemented stem behaviour between these two different bearings using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse, clinical and patient reported measures (Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, Short Form-36 and satisfaction) and whole blood metal ion levels at two years. A power study indicated that 50 hips were needed in each group to detect subsidence of > 5 mm at two years with a p-value of < 0.05.

Significant improvement (p < 0.001) was found in the mean clinical and patient reported outcomes at two years for both groups. Comparison of outcomes between the groups at two years showed no statistically significant difference for mean stem migration, clinical and patient reported outcomes; except overall patient satisfaction which was higher for metal-on-metal group (p = 0.05). Metal ion levels were raised above the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency advised safety level (7 µg per litre) in 20% of the metal-on-metal group and in one patient in metal-on-polyethylene group (who had a metal-on-metal implant on the contralateral side). Two patients in the metal-on-metal group were revised, one for pseudotumour and one for peri-prosthetic fracture.

Use of large modular heads is associated with a risk of raised whole blood metal ion levels despite using a proven bearing from resurfacing. The head-neck junction or excess stem micromotion are possibly the weak links warranting further research.