This study evaluated the acceptability of performing manipulations with intranasal diamorphine and inhaled Entonox to parents of children presenting to our Emergency Department. 65 fractures were manipulated in the Emergency Department in a 4-month timespan. Parents were invited to complete a questionnaire to indicate their experience with the procedure. Fracture position post-reduction was calculated as well as conversion rate to surgery. 32 patients who were admitted and had their forearm fractures managed in theatre were also asked to complete the questionnaire as a comparison group.Purpose
Method
Paediatric distal radial and forearm fractures account for 37.4% of all fractures in children. We present our 2.5-year results of a novel safe approach to the treatment of simple distal radial and diaphyseal fractures using intranasal diamorphine and entonox in a designated fracture reduction room in the emergency department. All simple fractures of the distal radius and forearm admitted to our ED between March 2012 and August 2014 that could be reduced using simple manipulation techniques were included in this study. These included angulated diaphyseal fractures of the forearm, angulated metaphyseal fractures of the distal radius and Salter Harris types I and II without significant shortening. All children included were given intranasal diamorphine as well as entonox. The orthopaedic registrar on call performed all reductions. 100 children had their distal radius or forearm fracture reduced in the emergency department using entonox and diamorphine analgesia and had a same day discharge. Average age was 10 years (range 2.20–16.37 years). No complications were reported regarding the use of the analgesia and all children and parents were pleased with their treatment not requiring a hospital admission. The mean initial dorsal angulation of all fracture types was 28.05° degrees (23.91–32.23 95% CI) which was reduced to 7.03° (5.11–8.95 95% CI) post manipulation. There were 9 cases lost to follow up. Two cases lost the initial reduction of the fracture on subsequent clinic follow up and underwent internal fixation in theatre. The use of entonox and intranasal diamorphine is a safe, effective treatment of providing adequate analgesia for children with distal radial and forearm fractures to allow manipulation of displaced dorsally angulated fractures in the emergency department. By facilitating a same day discharge, over £45,000 was saved using this safe method of treatment.
The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of intra-operative tranexamic acid in children with osteogenesis imperfecta, who have been shown to have increased bleeding tendency, in deformity correction surgery. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of lower limb intramedullary rodding in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta treated in our unit from 2000–2013 in whom a pre and post- operative full blood count was available (n=69). Case notes were reviewed and patients were grouped according to the use of tranexamic acid. Peri-operative change in haemoglobin (Hb), haematocrit (HCT) and requirement for blood transfusion was assessed. Of 69 operations performed, 62.3% were in female patients, 78.3% were femoral, and 43.5% were bilateral cases (19 femur, 11 tibia). In the non-tranexamic acid group there was a mean drop in Hb of 28.9 g/L (range 0–62), mean HCT drop of 8.8 (range 2.2–19.4) and 3 patients required red cell transfusion. In the tranexamic acid group there was a mean Hb drop of 22.5 g/L (range 1–49), mean HCT drop of 7.35 (range −0.8–16.7) and one patient required red cell transfusion. There was a significant decrease in Hb drop (p=0.0287) in the tranexamic acid group. Tranexamic acid seems to decrease the drop in haemoglobin during lower limb intramedullary rodding in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta, with little associated risk. Protocols should be established for future use a further review undertaken.
The objective was to assess whether late presentation of DDH leads to an increase in treatment magnitude and cost. This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from our hip instability clinic database. All patients presenting to our hip instability clinic that required any form of treatment for DDH between 1990 and 2005 were included. Children were grouped according to age at presentation and then treatment requirements were reviewed. Average costs were calculated based on procedures performed.Aim
Method
The objective was to assess whether late presentation of DDH leads to an increase in treatment magnitude and cost. This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from our hip instability clinic database. All patients presenting to our hip instability clinic that required any form of treatment for DDH between 1990 and 2005 were included. Children were grouped according to age at presentation and then treatment requirements were reviewed. Average costs were calculated based on procedures performed.Objective
Methods
The lateral pillar classification (LPC) is a widely used tool in determining prognosis and planning treatment in patients who are in the fragmentation stage of Perthes disease. The original classification has been modified to help increase the accuracy of the classification system by the Herring group. The purpose of our study was to independently assess this modified Herring classification. 35 standardized true antero-posterior radiographs of children in various stages of fragmentation were independently assessed by 6 senior observers on 2 separate occasions (6 weeks apart). Kappa analysis was used to assess the inter and intraobserver agreement between observations made. The degrees of agreement were as follows: poor, fair, moderate, good and very good. Intraobserver analysis revealed at best only moderate agreement for two observers. 3 observers showed fair consistency, whilst 1 remaining observer showed poor consistency between repeated observations (p<0.01). The highest scores for interobserver agreement varying between moderate to good could only be established between 2 observers. For the remaining observers results were just fair (p<0.01). This study highlights the lack of agreement between senior clinicians when applying the modified LPC. This has clinical implications when applying the classification to the decision making process in treating patients at risk of developing adverse outcomes from the disease. To our knowledge, this is the first time the modified LPC has been independently tested for its reproducibility by another specialist paediatric orthopaedic unit.
