STUDY PURPOSES

To evaluate the role of “top up” intra-articular local anaesthetic injection in patients who have had UKR.

Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford and the Nuffield Orthopaedic Hospital, Oxford

Introduction

Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) is an appealing alternative to Total Knee Replacement (TKR) when the patient has isolated compartment osteoarthritis (OA). A common observation post-operatively is radiolucency between the tibial tray wall and the bone. In addition, some patients complain of persistent pain following implantation with a UKR; this may be related to elevated bone strains in the tibia. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical environment of the tibia bone adjacent to the tray wall, following UKR, to determine whether this region of bone resorbs, and how altering the mechanical environment affects tibia strains.

Purpose

To identify genes showing altered expression in osteoarthritic (OA) cartilage and synovium. Dkk3, a member of the Dickoppf family of Wnt signalling inhibitors was overexpressed and this work highlights the potential function of Dkk3 in OA.

INTRODUCTION

Mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an accepted treatment for patients with isolated medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) with a full thickness cartilage loss. The aim of this study was to determine if this recommendation was correct and if the procedure could be used for partial-thickness cartilage loss.

Aim

This aim of this study was to investigate apoptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and their upstream markers in Anteromedial Gonarthrosis (AMG).

The contraindications for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) remain controversial. The views of many surgeons are based on Kozinn and Scott’s 1989 publication which stated that patients who weighed more than 82 kg, were younger than 60 years, undertook heavy labour, had exposed bone in the patellofemoral joint or chondrocalcinosis, were not ideal candidates for UKR. Our aim was to determine whether these potential contraindications should apply to patients with a mobile-bearing UKR. In order to do this the outcome of patients with these potential contraindications was compared with that of patients without the contraindications in a prospective series of 1000 UKRs. The outcome was assessed using the Oxford knee score, the American Knee Society score, the Tegner activity score, revision rate and survival.

The clinical outcome of patients with each of the potential contraindications was similar to or better than those without each contraindication. Overall, 678 UKRs (68%) were performed in patients who had at least one potential contraindication and only 322 (32%) in patients deemed to be ideal. The survival at ten years was 97.0% (95% confidence interval 93.4 to 100.0) for those with potential contraindications and 93.6% (95% confidence interval 87.2 to 100.0) in the ideal patients.

We conclude that the thresholds proposed by Kozinn and Scott using weight, age, activity, the state of the patellofemoral joint and chondrocalcinosis should not be considered to be contraindications for the use of the Oxford UKR.

The Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) was designed to minimise wear utilising a fully-congruent, mobile, polyethylene bearing. Wear of polyethylene is a significant cause of revision surgery in UKR in the first decade, and the incidence increases in the second decade. Our study used model-based radiostereometric analysis to measure the combined wear of the upper and lower bearing surfaces in 13 medial-compartment Oxford UKRs at a mean of 20.9 years (17.2 to 25.9) post-operatively.

The mean linear penetration of the polyethylene bearing was 1.04 mm (0.307 to 2.15), with a mean annual wear rate of 0.045 mm/year (0.016 to 0.099). The annual wear rate of the phase-2 bearings (mean 0.022 mm/year) was significantly less (p = 0.01) than that of phase-1 bearings (mean 0.07 mm/year).

The linear wear rate of the Oxford UKR remains very low into the third decade. We believe that phase-2 bearings had lower wear rates than phase-1 implants because of the improved bearing design and surgical technique which decreased the incidence of impingement. We conclude that the design of the Oxford UKR gives low rates of wear in the long term.

We have compared the outcome of hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in three distinct diagnostic groups, using survival analysis as used by the United Kingdom national joint registers, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as recommended by Darzi in the 2008 NHS review, and transition and satisfaction questions.

A total of 72 hemiarthroplasties, 19 for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with an intact rotator cuff, 22 for OA with a torn rotator cuff, and 31 for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), were followed up for between three and eight years. All the patients survived, with no revisions or dislocations and no significant radiological evidence of loosening. The mean new Oxford shoulder score (minimum/worst 0, maximum/best 48) improved significantly for all groups (p < 0.001), in the OA group with an intact rotator cuff from 21.4 to 38.8 (effect size 2.9), in the OA group with a torn rotator cuff from 13.3 to 27.2 (effect size 2.1) and in the RA group from 13.7 to 28.0 (effect size 3.1). By this assessment, and for the survival analysis, there was no significant difference between the groups. However, when ratings using the patient satisfaction questions were analysed, eight (29.6%) of the RA group were ‘disappointed’, compared with one (9.1%) of the OA group with cuff intact and one (7.7%) of the OA group with cuff torn. All patients in the OA group with cuff torn indicated that they would undergo the operation again, compared to ten (90.9%) in the OA group with cuff intact and 20 (76.9%) in the RA group.

The use of revision rates alone does not fully represent outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder. Data from PROMs provides more information about change in pain and the ability to undertake activities and perform tasks. The additional use of satisfaction ratings shows that both the rates of revision surgery and PROMs need careful interpretation in the context of patient expectations.

Purpose: This study was designed to establish the poly-ethylene wear rates in the Oxford medial unicompert-mental knee replacement.

Introduction: The Oxford meniscal bearing knee was introduced as a design to reduce polyethylene wear. There has been one previous retrieval study of the Oxford UKA, which reported very low wear rates in some specimens, but abnormal patterns of wear in others, including impingement. There has been no further investigation of these abnormal wear patterns.

Methods: Forty-seven bearings were retrieved from patients who had received a medial Oxford UKA for anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee, none of which had previously been studied. Mean time to revision was 8.4 years (SD 4.1) and 20 had been implanted for over 10 years. The macroscopic pattern of polyethylene wear and the linear penetration (dial gauge measurement) was recorded for each bearing.

Results: The mean linear penetration rate (LPR) was 0.07mm/year. The patterns of wear fell into 4 categories, each with a different LPR; 1) No abnormal macroscopic appearance, n=16 (LPR = 0.01mm/year), 2) Abnormal macroscopic wear with extra-articular impingement, n=16 (LPR = 0.05mm/year), 3) Abnormal macroscopic wear with intra-articular impingement, n=6 (LPR = 0.10mm/year), 4) Abnormal macroscopic wear with impingement and signs of incongruous articulation, n=9 (LPR = 0.14mm/year). The differences in LPR were statistically significant (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: The results show that very low polyethylene wear rates are possible if the device functions normally. However if the bearing displays abnormal function (extra-articular, intra-articular impingement or incongruous articulation) wear rates increase significantly.

Introduction: Patellofemoral joint subluxation is associated with pain and dysfunction. The causes of patel-lofemoral subluxation are poorly understood and multi-factorial, arising from abnormalities of both bone and soft tissues. This study aims to identify which anatomical variables assessed on Magnetic Resonance (MR) images are most relevant to patellofemoral subluxation.

Method: A retrospective analysis of MR studies of 60 patients with suspected patellofemoral subluxation was performed. All patients were graded for the severity/ magnitude of radiological subluxation using a dynamic MR scan (Grade 0 [nil] to Grade 3 [subluxed]. The patient scans were assessed using a range of anatomical variables, these included:

Patella alta,

Results: The distance of the VMO from the patella (p < 0.001), TTD (p < 0.001) and Patella Engagement (p < 0.001) showed highly significant relationships with patellofemoral subluxation.

Conclusions: The following three anatomical variables are associated with patellofemoral subluxation: the distance of the VMO muscle from the patella, TTD and Patella Engagement.

This is the first study to establish that patella engagement is related to PFJ subluxation showing that the lower the percentage engagement of the patella in the trochlea, the greater the severity/magnitude of patellofemoral subluxation. The finding provides greater insight into the aetiology and understanding of the mechanism of symptomatic PFJ subluxation.

Anteromedial Osteoarthritis of the Knee (AMOA) is a distinct phenotype of OA. Within this pattern of disease, the anterior third of the medial tibial plateau exhibits full thickness cartilage loss. The middle third has damaged partial thickness cartilage, and the posterior third has retained cartilage, which is seen on macroscopic visual assessment to be normal. This study investigates the molecular features of progressive severities of cartilage damage within this phenotype.

Ten medial tibial plateau specimens were collected from patients undergoing unicompartmental knee replacements. The cartilage within the area of macroscopic damage was divided into equal thirds: T1(most damaged), to T3 (least damaged). The area of macroscopically undamaged cartilage was taken as a 4th sample, N. The specimens were prepared for histological (Safranin-O) and immunohistochemical analysis (Type I and II Collagen, proliferation and apoptosis). Immunoassays were undertaken for Collagens I and II and GAG content. Real time PCR compared gene expression between areas T and N.

There was a decrease in OARSI grade across the four areas, with progressively less fibrillation between areas T1, T2 and T3. Area N had a grade of 0 (normal). The GAG immunoassay showed decreased levels with increasing severity of cartilage damage (p< 0.0001). Proliferation and apoptosis, as expected, were increased in the more damaged areas. There was no significant difference in the Collagen II content or gene expression between areas. The Collagen I immunohistochemistry showed increased staining within chondrocyte pericellular areas in the undamaged region (N) and immunoassays showed that the Collagen I content of this macroscopically and histologically normal cartilage, was significantly higher than the damaged areas (p< 0.0001). Furthermore, real time PCR showed a significant increase in Collagen I expression in the macroscopically normal areas compared to the damaged areas (p=0.04).

We conclude that in this phenotype the Collagen I increase, in areas of macroscopically and histologically normal cartilage, may represent very early changes of the cartilage matrix within the osteoarthritic disease process. This may be able to be used as an assay of early disease and as a therapeutic target for disease modification or treatment.

The Oxford Unicompartmental Knee replacement (UKR) was introduced as a design to reduce polyethylene wear. There has been one previous retrieval study involving this implant, which reported very low rates of wear in some specimens but abnormal patterns of wear in others. There has been no further investigation of these abnormal patterns. The bearings were retrieved from 47 patients who had received a medial Oxford UKR for anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. None had been studied previously. The mean time to revision was 8.4 years (sd 4.1), with 20 having been implanted for over ten years. The macroscopic pattern of polyethylene wear and the linear penetration were recorded for each bearing. The mean rate of linear penetration was 0.07 mm/year. The patterns of wear fell into three categories, each with a different rate of linear penetration; 1) no abnormal macroscopic wear and a normal articular surface, n = 16 (linear penetration rate = 0.01 mm/year); 2) abnormal macroscopic wear and normal articular surfaces with extra-articular impingement, n = 16 (linear penetration rate = 0.05 mm/year); 3) abnormal macroscopic wear and abnormal articular surfaces with intra-articular impingement +/− signs of non-congruous articulation, n = 15 (linear penetration rate = 0.12 mm/year). The differences in linear penetration rate were statistically significant (p < 0.001).

These results show that very low rates of polyethylene wear are possible if the device functions normally. However, if the bearing displays suboptimal function (extra-articular, intra-articular impingement or incongruous articulation) the rates of wear increase significantly.

With medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) there is occasionally a full-thickness ulcer of the cartilage on the medial side of the lateral femoral condyle. It is not clear whether this should be considered a contraindication to unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The aim of this study was to determine why these ulcers occur, and whether they compromise the outcome of UKR.

Case studies of knees with medial OA suggest that cartilage lesions on the medial side of the lateral condyle are caused by impingement on the lateral tibial spine as a result of the varus deformity and tibial subluxation. Following UKR the varus and the subluxation are corrected, so that impingement is prevented and the damaged part of the lateral femoral condyle is not transmitting load. An illustrative case report is presented.

Out of 769 knees with OA of the medial compartment treated with the Oxford UKR, 59 (7.7%) had partial-thickness cartilage loss and 20 (2.6%) had a full-thickness cartilage deficit on the medial side of the lateral condyle. The mean Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at the last follow-up at a mean of four years was 41.9 (13 to 48) in those with partial-thickness cartilage loss and 41.0 (20 to 48) in those with full-thickness loss. In those with normal or superficially damaged cartilage the mean was 39.5 (5 to 48) and 39.7 (8 to 48), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the pre-operative OKS, the final review OKS or of change in the score in the various groups.

We conclude that in medial compartment OA, damage to the medial side of the lateral femoral condyle is caused by impingement on the tibial spine and should not be considered a contraindication to an Oxford UKR, even if there is extensive full-thickness ulceration of the cartilage.

Using the General Practice Research Database, we examined the temporal changes in the rates of primary total hip (THR) and total knee (TKR) replacement, the age at operation and the female-to-male ratio between 1991 and 2006 in the United Kingdom.

We identified 27 113 patients with THR and 23 843 with TKR. The rate of performance of THR and TKR had increased significantly (p < 0.0001 for both) during the 16-year period and was greater for TKR, especially in the last five years. The mean age at operation was greater for women than for men and had remained stable throughout the period of study. The female-to-male ratio was higher for THR and TKR and had remained stable.

The data support the notion that the rate of joint replacement is increasing in the United Kingdom with the rate of TKR rising at the highest rate. The perception that the mean age for TKR has decreased over time is not supported.

Purpose: Varus deformity after total knee replacement (TKR) is associated with poor outcome. This aim of this study was to determine whether the same is true for medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA).

Methods: 158 patients implanted with the Oxford UKA, using a minimally invasive approach, were studied prospectively for five years. Leg alignment was measured with a long-arm goniometer referenced from Anterior Superior Iliac Spine, centre of patella and centre of ankle. Patients were grouped according to the American Knee Society Score (AKSS). Group A: > 0° varus (n=13, 8.2%); Group B: 0 to 4° valgus (n=39, 24.7%); Group C: 5–10° valgus (normal alignment, n=106, 67.12%). Comparisons were made between the three groups in terms of the absolute and the change in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and AKSS over the five year period, and the presence of radiolucency.

Results: There was no significant difference in any outcome measure except for Objective-AKSS (p< 0.001). The means and standard deviations of the ΔOKS for the groups were:

24 ± 5,

The frequency of five year radiolucency for the groups A, B, and C were 42%, 35%, and 45% respectively.

Conclusion: The aim of the Oxford UKA is to restore knee kinematics and thus knee alignment to the pre-disease state. Therefore, as demonstrated by this study, about 30% of patients have varus alignment. This study also demonstrates that post-operative varus alignment does not compromise the outcome. The only score which did show worse outcome was the Objective-AKSS. This is because 10 or 20 points are deducted for varus alignment, which is not appropriate following UKA. Therefore, AKSS in its present form is not a reliable tool for assessment of UKA.

Purpose: To identify associative factors for radiolucency (RL) under the tibial component following the Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA), and to evaluate its effect on clinical outcome scores.

Method: One hundred and sixty-one knees which had undergone primary Phase 3 medial Oxford UKA were included. Fluoroscopic radiography films were assessed at five years post-operatively for areas of tibial RL. The two groups of patients, with and without RL, were compared to

patients’ pre-operative demographics for age, weight, height, BMI,

Results: 101 (62%) knees were found to have tibial RL. All RL were categorised as physiological or they were < 1mm thick, with sclerotic margins and non-progressive. No statistical difference was found between knees with RL and those without, in terms of pre-operative demographics, intra- or post-operative factors, and clinical outcome scores (p> 0.1 in all variables).

Discussion: Radiolucency (RL) under the tibial component is a common finding following the Oxford UKA. Many theories have been proposed to explain the cause of RL, such as poor cementing, osteonecrosis, micromotion, and thermal necrosis. However, the true aetiology and clinical significance remain unclear. We attempted to address this.

We found no significant relationship between physiological RL, pre-operative demographics, intra-operative variables and clinical outcome scores in this study. Tibial RL remains a common finding following the Oxford UKA yet we do not know why it occurs but in the medium term, clinical outcome is not influenced by RL. In particular, it is not a sign of loosening. Physiological RL can therefore be ignored even if associated with adverse symptoms following the Oxford UKA.

Aim: To investigate the molecular features of progressive severities of cartilage damage, within the phenotype of Anteromedial Osteoarthritis of the Knee (AMOA).

Methods: Ten medial tibial plateau specimens were collected from patients undergoing unicompartmental knee replacements.

The cartilage within the area of macroscopic damage was divided into equal thirds: T1(most damaged), to T3 (least damaged). The area of macroscopically undamaged cartilage was taken as a 4th sample, N. The specimens were prepared for histological (Safranin-O and H& E staining) and immunohistochemical analysis (Type I and II Collagen, proliferation and apoptosis).

Immunoassays were undertaken for Collagens I and II and GAG content. Real time PCR compared gene expression between areas T and N.

Results: There was a decrease in OARSI grade across the four areas, with progressively less fibrillation between areas T1, T2 and T3. Area N had an OARSI grade of 0 (normal).

The GAG immunoassay showed decreased levels with increasing severity of cartilage damage (ANOVA P< 0.0001).

There was no significant difference in the Collagen II content or gene expression between areas.

The Collagen I immunohistochemistry showed increased staining within chondrocyte pericellular areas in the undamaged region (N) and immunoassays showed that the Collagen I content of this macroscopically and histologically normal cartilage, was significantly higher than the damaged areas (ANOVA P< 0.0001). Furthermore, real time PCR showed that there was a significant difference in Collagen I expression between the damaged and macroscopically normal areas (p=0.04).

Conclusion: In AMOA there are distinct areas, demonstrating progressive cartilage loss. We conclude that in this phenotype the Collagen I increase, in areas of macroscopically and histologically normal cartilage, may represent very early changes of the cartilage matrix within the osteoarthritic disease process. This may be able to be used as an assay of early disease and as a therapeutic target for disease modification or treatment.

Narrow, well-defined radiolucent lines commonly observed at the bone-implant interface of unicompartmental knee replacement tibial components have been referred to as physiological radiolucencies. These should be distinguished from pathological radiolucencies, which are poorly defined, wide and progressive, and associated with loosening and infection. We studied the incidence and clinical significance of tibial radiolucent lines in 161 Oxford unicondylar knee replacements five years after surgery. All the radiographs were aligned with fluoroscopic control to obtain views parallel to the tibial tray to reveal the tibial bone-implant interface.

We found that 49 knees (30%) had complete, 52 (32%) had partial and 60 (37%) had no radiolucent lines. There was no relationship between the incidence of radiolucent lines and patient factors such as gender, body mass index and activity, or operative factors including the status of the anterior cruciate ligament and residual varus deformity. Nor was any statistical relationship established between the presence of radiolucent lines and clinical outcome, particularly pain, assessed by the Oxford Knee score and the American Knee Society score.

We conclude that radiolucent lines are common after Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement but that their aetiology remains unclear. Radiolucent lines were not a source of adverse symptoms or pain. Therefore, when attempting to identify a source of postoperative pain after Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement the presence of a physiological radiolucency should be ignored.

We randomised 62 knees to receive either cemented or cementless versions of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. The implants used in both arms of the study were similar, except that the cementless components were coated with porous titanium and hydroxyapatite. The tibial interfaces were studied with fluoroscopically-aligned radiographs.

At one year there was no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups. Narrow radiolucent lines were seen at the bone-implant interfaces in 75% of cemented tibial components. These were partial in 43%, and complete in 32%. In the cementless implants, partial radiolucencies were seen in 7% and complete radiolucencies in none. These differences are statistically significant (p < 0.0001) and imply satisfactory bone ingrowth into the cementless implants.