Immigrated Canadians make up approximately 20% of the total population in Canada, and 30% of the population in Ontario. Despite universal health coverage and an equal prevalence of severe arthritis in immigrants relative to non-immigrants, the former may be underrepresented amongst arthroplasty recipients secondary to challenges navigating the healthcare system. The primary aim of this study was to determine if utilization of arthroplasty differs between immigrant populations and persons born in Canada. The secondary aim was to determine differences in outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA, respectively).

This is a retrospective population-based cohort study using health administrative databases. All patients aged ≥18 in Ontario who underwent their first primary elective THA or TKA between 2002 and 2016 were identified. Immigration status for each patient was identified via linkage to the ‘Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Canada’ database. Outcomes included all-cause and septic revision surgery within 12-months, dislocation (for THA) and total post-operative case cost and were compared between groups. Cochrane-Armitage Test for Trend was utilized to determine if the uptake of arthroplasty by immigrants changed over time.

There was a total of 186,528 TKA recipients and 116,472 THA recipients identified over the study period. Of these, 10,193 (5.5%) and 3,165 (2.7%) were immigrants, respectively. The largest proportion of immigrants were from the Asia and Pacific region for those undergoing TKA (54.0%) and Europe for THA recipients (53.4%). There was no difference in the rate of all-cause revision or septic revision at 12 months between groups undergoing TKA (p=0.864, p=0.585) or THA (p=0.527, p=0.397), respectively. There was also no difference in the rate of dislocations between immigrants and people born in Canada (p=0.765, respectively).

Despite having similar complication rates and costs, immigrants represent a significantly smaller proportion of joint replacement recipients than they represent in the general population in Ontario. These results suggest significant underutilization of surgical management for arthritis among Canada's immigrant populations. Initiatives to improve access to total joint arthroplasty are warranted.

Demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing as it remains the gold-standard treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. While magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the knee are not indicated for diagnosing knee OA, they are commonly ordered prior to the referral to an orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of patients who underwent an MRI in the two years prior to their primary TKA for OA. Secondary outcomes included determining patient and physician associations with increased MRI usage.

This is a population-based cohort study using billing codes in Ontario, Canada. All patients over 40 years-old who underwent a primary TKA between April 1, 2008 and March 31, 2017 were included. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS and included the Cochran-Armitage test for trend of MRI prior to surgery, and predictive multivariable regression model. Significance was set to p<0.05.

There were 172,689 eligible first-time TKA recipients, of which 34,140 (19.8%) received an MRI in the two years prior to their surgery. The majority of these (70.8%) were ordered by primary care physicians, followed by orthopaedic surgeons (22.5%). Patients who received an MRI were younger and had fewer comorbidities than patients who did not (p<0.001). MRI use prior to TKA increased from 15.9% in 2008 to 20.1% in 2017 (p<0.0001).

Despite MRIs rarely being indicated for the work-up of knee OA, nearly one in five patients have an MRI in the two years prior to their TKA. Reducing the use of this prior to TKA may help reduce wait-times for surgery.

Aims

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful surgical procedures. The objectives of this study were to define whether there is a correlation between socioeconomic status (SES) and surgical complications after elective primary unilateral THA, and investigate whether access to elective THA differs within SES groups.

Aims

Echocardiography is commonly used in hip fracture patients to evaluate perioperative cardiac risk. However, echocardiography that delays surgical repair may be harmful. The objective of this study was to compare surgical wait times, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and healthcare costs for similar hip fracture patients evaluated with and without preoperative echocardiograms.

Echocardiography is commonly used in hip fracture patients to evaluate perioperative cardiac risk and identify cardiac abnormalities. However, echocardiography that delays surgical repair may be harmful. The objective of this study was to compare mortality, surgical wait times, length of stay (LOS), and health care costs for similar hip fracture patients managed with and without preoperative echocardiograms.

A population based, retrospective cohort study of all hip fracture patients (>age 45) in Ontario, Canada was conducted. The primary exposure was pre-operative echocardiography (between hospital admission and surgery). Patients receiving preoperative echocardiograms were matched to those without using a propensity score incorporating patient demographic information, comorbidity status, and provider information. Mortality rates, surgical wait times, post-operative length of stay (LOS), and medical costs (expressed as 2013$ CAN) up to 1-year post-operatively were assessed after matching.

There were 2354 (∼5.6%) of 42,230 eligible hip fracture patients that received a preoperative echocardiogram during the study period. After successfully matching 2298 (∼97.6%) patients, echocardiography was associated with significant increases in mortality at 90 days (20.1% vs. 16.8%, p=0.004) and 1 year (32.9% vs. 27.8%, p < 0 .001), but not 30-days (11.4% vs. 9.8%, p=0.084). Patients with echocardiography also had an increased (mean ± SD) delay (in hours) from presentation to surgery (68.80 ± 44.23 hours vs. 39.69 ± 27.09 hours, p < 0 .001) and only 38.1% of patients had surgery within 48 hours. Total LOS (in days) (mean 19.49 ± 25.39 days vs. 15.94 ± 22.48 days, p < 0 .001) and total healthcare costs at 1 year (mean: $51,714.69 ± 54,675.28 vs. $41,861.47 ± 50,854.12, p < 0 .001) were also increased. There was wide variability in echocardiography ordering practice in Ontario, with a range of 0% to 22.97% of hip fracture patients undergoing preoperative echocardiography at different hospital sites.

Preoperative echocardiography for hip fracture patients is associated with increased postoperative mortality. It is also associated with increased surgical delay, post-operative LOS, and total health care costs at 1 year. Echocardiography should be considered an urgent test when ordered to prevent additional surgical delay, and further research is necessary to clarify indications for this common preoperative investigation.

Rotator cuff repair (RCR) can be performed open or arthroscopically, with a recent dramatic increase in the latter. Despite controversy about the preferred technique, there has been an increase in the number of repairs performed arthroscopically. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to compare revision rates following open and arthroscopic RCR repair.

Adult patients undergoing first-time, primary rotator cuff repair in Ontario, Canada (April 2003-March 2014) were identified using physician billing and hospital databases. Patients were followed for a minimum of two and up to 13 years for the primary outcome, revision rotator cuff repair, and secondary outcome, surgical site infection. The intervention considered was open versus arthroscopic technique. Patient factors (age, gender, residence, socioeconomic status, medical comorbidities) and provider factors (surgical volume, hospital setting, worked night before, year of surgery) were recorded. Standardized mean differences were used for covariate comparison. A Cox Proportional Hazards model was used to compare RCR survivorship between the two groups after adjustment for patient and provider factors, generating hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (HR, 95% CIs). Censoring occurred on the first of the primary outcome, death, shoulder arthroplasty or arthrodesis, or the end of the follow-up period (March 2016).

A total of 37,255 patients were included. The overall revision RCR rate was 2.9% (1,096 patients) with a median time to revision of 23 months (IQR 12–52). Revision repair was more common in the arthroscopic group in comparison to the open group (3.2% vs 2.6%, NNT 166.7, p=0.004), with an adjusted HR of 0.72 (0.63–0.83 95% CI, p < 0 .0001). The surgical site infection rate was significantly higher in the open group compared with the arthroscopic group (0.5% vs 0.2%, NNT 333.3, p < 0 .001). Patient and provider covariates had no statistically significant effect on revision rates, aside from increasing age (per 10 year increase, HR 0.85, 0.81–0.90 95% CI, p < 0 .0001).

Revision rotator cuff repair is approximately 30% more common in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair, in comparison to open repair, after adjustment. Surgical site infection is uncommon regardless of surgical technique, however, it is slightly more common following open repair. In the setting of an economic healthcare crisis, trends of increasing arthroscopic RCR may demand scrutiny, as the technique is associated with higher revision rates and higher costs.

Socially deprived patients face significant barriers that reduce their access to care, presenting unique challenges for orthopaedic surgeons. Few studies have investigated the outcomes of surgical fracture care among those socially deprived, despite the increased incidence of fractures, and the inequality of care received in this group. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether social deprivation impacted the complications and subsequent management of marginalized/homeless patients following ankle fracture surgery.

In this retrospective, population-based cohort study involving 202 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, we evaluated 45,444 patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation for an ankle fracture performed by 710 different surgeons between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2011. Socioeconomic deprivation was measured for each patient according to their residential location by using the “deprivation” component of the Ontario Marginalization Index (ON-MARG). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between deprivation and shorter-term outcomes within 1 year (implant removal, repeat ORIF, irrigation and debridement due to infection, and amputation). Multivariable cox proportional hazards (CPH) models were used to assess longer-term outcomes up to 20 years (ankle fusion and ankle arthroplasty).

A higher level of deprivation was associated with an increased risk of I&D (quintile 5 vs. quintile 1: odds ratio (OR) 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25–3.67, p = 0.0054) and amputation (quintile 4 vs. quintile 1: OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.01–12.4, p = 0.0466). It was more common for less deprived patients to have their hardware removed compared to more deprived patients (quintile 5 vs. quintile 1: OR 0.822, 95% CI 0.76–0.888, p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between marginalization and subsequent revision ORIF, ankle fusion, or ankle arthroplasty.

Marginalized patients are at a significantly increased risk of infection and amputation following operatively treated ankle fractures. However, these complications are still extremely rare among this group. Thus, socioeconomic deprivation should not prohibit marginalized patients from receiving operative management for unstable ankle fractures.

Echocardiography is commonly used in hip fracture patients to evaluate perioperative cardiac risk and identify cardiac abnormalities. However, echocardiography that delays surgical repair may be harmful. The objective of this study was to compare mortality, surgical wait times, length of stay (LOS), and health care costs for similar hip fracture patients managed with and without preoperative echocardiography.

A population based, retrospective cohort study of all hip fracture patients (>age 45) in Ontario, Canada was conducted. The primary exposure was pre-operative echocardiography (between hospital admission and surgery). Patients receiving preoperative echocardiography were matched to those without using a propensity score incorporating patient demographic information, comorbidity status, and provider information. Mortality rates, surgical wait times, post-operative length of stay (LOS), and medical costs (expressed as 2013$ CAN) up to one year post-operatively were assessed after matching.

There were 2354 (∼5.6%) of 42,230 eligible hip fracture patients that received preoperative echocardiograghy during the study period. After successfully matching 2298 (∼97.6%) patients, echocardiography was associated with significant increases in mortality at 90 days (20.1% vs. 16.8%, p=0.004) and one year (32.9% vs. 27.8%, p < 0 .001), but not 30-days (11.4% vs. 9.8%, p=0.084). Patients with echocardiography also had an increased (mean ± SD) delay (in hours) from presentation to surgery (68.80 ± 44.23 hours vs. 39.69 ± 27.09 hours, p < 0 .001) and only 38.1% of patients had surgery within 48 hours. Total LOS (in days) (mean 19.49 ± 25.39 days vs. 15.94 ± 22.48 days, p < 0 .001) and total healthcare costs at one year (mean: $51,714.69 ± 54,675.28 vs. $41,861.47 ± 50,854.12, p < 0 .001) were also increased. There was wide variability in echocardiography ordering practice in Ontario, with a range of 0% to 22.97% of hip fracture patients undergoing preoperative echocardiography at different hospital sites.

Preoperative echocardiography for hip fracture patients is associated with increased postoperative mortality. It is also associated with increased surgical delay, post-operative LOS, and total health care costs at one year. Echocardiography should be considered an urgent test when ordered to prevent additional surgical delay, and further research is necessary to clarify indications for this common preoperative investigation.

Although wait-times for hip fracture surgery have been linked to mortality and are being used as quality-of-care indicators worldwide, controversy exists about the duration of the wait that leads to complications. Our objective was to use new population-based wait-time data to emprically derive an optimal time window in which to conduct hip fracture surgery before the risk of complications increases.

We used health administrative data from Ontario, Canada to identify hip fracture patients between 2009 and 2014. The main exposure was the time from hospital arrival to surgery (in hours). The primary outcome was mortality within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included a composite of mortality or other medical complications (MI, DVT, PE, and pneumonia) also within 30 days. Risk-adjusted cubic splines modeled the probability of each complication according to wait-time. The inflection point (in hours) when complications began to increase was used to define ‘early’ and ‘delayed’ surgery. To evaluate the robustness of this definition, outcomes amongst propensity-score matched early and delayed patients were compared using percent absolute risk differences (% ARDs, with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]).

There were 42,230 patients who met entry criteria. Their mean age was 80.1 (±10.7) and the majority were female (70.5%). The risk of complications modeled by cubic splines consistently increased when wait-times were greater than 24 hours, irrespective of the complication considered. Compared to 13,731 propensity-score matched patients who received surgery earlier, 13,731 patients receiving surgery after 24 hours had a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality (N=898 versus N=790, % ARD 0.79 [95% CI 0.23 to 1.35], p = .006) and the composite outcome (N=1,680 versus N=1,383, % ARD 2.16 [95% CI 1.43 to 2.89], p < .001). Overall, there were 14,174 patients (33.6%) who received surgery within 24 hours and 28,056 patients (66.4%) who received surgery after 24 hours.

Increased wait-time was associated with a greater risk for 30-day mortality and other complications. The finding that a wait-time of 24 hours represents a threshold defining higher risk may inform existing hip fracture guidelines. Since two-thirds of patients did not receive surgery within this timeframe, performance improvement efforts that reduce wait-times are warranted.