header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 53 - 53
17 Nov 2023
Wright K McDonald J Mennan C Perry J Peffers M Hulme C
Full Access

Abstract

Objectives

A promising therapy for early osteoarthritis (OA) is the transplantation of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hUC-MSCs). The synovial fluid (SF) from a pre-clinical ovine model treated with hUC-MSCs has been profiled using proteomics and bioinformatics to elucidate potential mechanisms of therapeutic effect.

Methods

Four weeks after a medial meniscus transection surgery, sheep were injected with 107 hUC-MSCs in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) or PBS only (n=7) and sacrificed at 12 weeks. SF was normalised for protein abundance (ProteoMinerTM) and analysed using label-free quantitation proteomics. Bioinformatics analyses (Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) and STRING) were used to assess differentially regulated functions from the proteomic data. Human orthologues were identified for the ovine proteins using UniProt and DAVID resources and proteins that were ≥±1.3 fold differentially abundant between treatment groups, were included in the bioinformatics analyses.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 8 - 8
1 Mar 2021
Hulme CH Perry J Roberts S Gallacher P Jermin P Wright KT
Full Access

Abstract

Objectives

The ability to predict which patients will improve following routine surgeries aimed at preventing the progression of osteoarthritis is needed to aid patients being stratified to receive the most appropriate treatment. This study aimed to investigate the potential of a panel of biomarkers for predicting (prior to treatment) the clinical outcome following treatment with microfracture or osteotomy.

Methods

Proteins known to relate to OA severity, with predictive value in autologous cell implantation treatment or that had been identified in proteomic analyses (aggrecanase-1/ ADAMTS-4, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), hyaluronic acid (HA), Lymphatic Vessel Endothelial Hyaluronan Receptor-1, matrix metalloproteinases-1 and −3, soluble CD14, S100 calcium binding protein A13 and 14-3-3 protein theta) were assessed in the synovial fluid (SF) of 19 and 13 patients prior to microfracture or osteotomy, respectively, using commercial immunoassays. Levels of COMP and HA were measured in the plasma of these patients. To find predictors of postoperative function, multiple linear regression analyses were performed.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 232 - 232
1 Mar 2010
Perry J Singh S Watson P Green A
Full Access

Purpose and Background: Physiotherapeutic management of lumbar disorders often incorporates specific manual therapy techniques of which McKenzie’s lumbar extension exercises (EIL) and segmental rotational grade V manipulation are popular options. The use of proxy measures of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity (skin conductance) is a recognised method of ascertaining neurophysiological responses to physiotherapy treatment but have yet to be used to assess magnitude of response to lumbar techniques. This preliminary study aimed to investigate the neurophysiological effects of these two treatment techniques.

Methodology: A quasi-experimental, independent group’s design was utilised, with random allocation of 50 normal, healthy participants (25 per group) into a manipulation group or an EIL group. Non-invasive neurophysiological measurements of skin conductance were taken as a proxy-measure of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity in the lower limbs before, during and after the administration of the techniques. Results were calculated using Area Under the Curve readings and converted into percentage change calculations for the intervention and the post-intervention periods.

Results: Both treatments increased SNS activity during the intervention period, 76% for the manipulation group (p=0.0005) and 35% for EIL group (p=0.0005) with the manipulative technique having significantly greater effect (p=0.012). Further analysis of the manipulation group found no difference between the ‘opening’ and the ‘closing’ side of the technique (p=0.76).

Conclusion: Preliminary evidence now exists supporting the neurophysiological effects of two lumbar techniques and that manipulation has a greater magnitude of effect over the EIL technique. Future research, on a low back pain patient population, is proposed and projected sample size calculations computed.