The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess and investigate the safety and efficacy of using a distal tibial osteotomy compared to proximal osteotomy for limb lengthening in children. In this study, there were 59 consecutive tibial lengthening and deformity corrections in 57 children using a circular frame. All were performed or supervised by the senior author between January 2013 and June 2019. A total of 25 who underwent a distal tibial osteotomy were analyzed and compared to a group of 34 who had a standard proximal tibial osteotomy. For each patient, the primary diagnosis, time in frame, complications, and lengthening achieved were recorded. From these data, the frame index was calculated (days/cm) and analyzed.Aims
Methods
Stable, anatomical fixation of acetabular fractures gives the best chance of a good outcome. We performed a biomechanical study to compare fracture stability and construct stiffness of three methods of fixation of posterior wall acetabular fractures. Two-dimensional motion analysis was used to measure fracture fragment displacement and the construct stiffness for each fixation method was calculated from the force / displacement data. Following 2 cyclic loading protocols of 6000 cycles, to a maximum 1.5kN, the mean fracture displacement was 0.154mm for the rim plate model, 0.326mm for the buttress plate and 0.254mm for the spring plate model. Mean maximum displacement was significantly less for the rim plate fixation than the buttress plate (p=0.015) and spring plate fixation (p=0.02). The rim plate was the stiffest construct 10962N/mm (SD 3351.8), followed by the spring plate model 5637N/mm (SD 832.6) and the buttress plate model 4882N/mm (SD 387.3). Where possible a rim plate with inter-fragmentary lag screws should be used for isolated posterior wall fracture fixation as this is the most stable and stiffest construct. However, when this method is not possible, spring plate fixation is a safe and superior alternative to a posterior buttress plate method.
The growth of the patients was an average 17cm. The graft diameters did not change despite large changes in graft length (average 145%). Most of the length gain was in the femur.
The potential harm to the growth plate following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally-immature patients is well documented, but we are not aware of literature on the subject of the fate of the graft itself. We have reviewed five adolescent males who underwent reconstruction of the ligament with four-strand hamstring grafts using MR images taken at a mean of 34.6 months (18 to 58) from the time of operation. The changes in dimension of the graft were measured and compared with those taken at the original operation. No growth arrest was seen on radiological or clinical measurement of leg-length discrepancy, nor was there any soft-tissue contracture. All the patients regained their pre-injury level of activity, including elite-level sport in three. The patients grew by a mean of 17.3 cm (14 to 24). The diameter of the grafts did not change despite large increases in length (mean 42%; 33% to 57%). Most of the gain in length was on the femoral side. Large changes in the length of the grafts were seen. There is a considerable increase in the size of the graft, so some neogenesis must occur; the graft must grow.
