Objectives

To study the vascularity and bone metabolism of the femoral head/neck following hip resurfacing arthroplasty, and to use these results to compare the posterior and the trochanteric-flip approaches.

Introduction: Pain and mass lesions around hip resurfacing are reported with increasing frequency. The aetiology is unknown but reaction to metal wear debris and mechanical impingement have both been suggested. We are aware of a group of our patients with significant pain following resurfacing. We sought to correlate metal ion levels with X-ray findings and any local soft tissue reaction around the prosthesis.

Methods: Patients with significant groin pain following hip resurfacing were identified from routine clinics. Blood was tested for cobalt and chromium levels using inductively coupled mass spectrometry in all patients. Cup abduction angle and femoral stem version were estimated from plain radiographs. Patients underwent ultrasound scan (USS) of the affected hip joint. Bilateral prostheses were excluded to avoid confounding.

Results: 47 unilateral painful hip resurfacings (24 female) were identified. USS was performed in 42 patients and was abnormal in 25 (15 female). Abnormalities ranged from simple joint effusion with or without synovial thickening, through to cystic masses in the posterior joint and solid masses related to the ileopsoas tendon similar to the appearances previously described in pseudotumours.

A two sample t-test demonstrated cobalt and chromium ion levels were significantly higher in patients with abnormalities on USS (p=0.038, p=0.05 respectively), patients with normal USS were more likely to have a retroverted femoral component (p=0.01).

Discussion: We describe two groups of patients with a painful hip resurfacing: those with raised metal ions and local soft tissue reaction, and those with lower metal ions and no soft tissue reaction. The retroverted stems in the second group could cause an iatrogenic cam-type impingement. Metal ion levels are useful to guide further imaging. Raised levels should prompt investigation for a soft tissue abnormality with either USS or MRI, lower levels suggest investigation should look for mechanical impingement with imaging such as CT.

Concerns have been reported to the United Kingdom National Patient Safety Agency, warning that cementing the femoral component during hip replacement surgery for fracture of the proximal femur may increase peri-operative mortality.

The National Hip Fracture Database collects demographic and outcome data about patients with a fracture of the proximal femur from over 100 participating hospitals in the United Kingdom. We conducted a mixed effects logistic regression analysis of this dataset to determine whether peri-operative mortality was increased in patients who had undergone either hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement using a cemented femoral component. A total of 16 496 patients from 129 hospitals were included in the analysis, which showed a small but significant adjusted survival benefit associated with cementing (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 0.96). Other statistically significant variables in predicting death at discharge, listed in order of magnitude of effect, were gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, age, walking accompanied outdoors and arthroplasty. Interaction terms between cementing and these other variables were sequentially added to, but did not improve, the model.

This study has not shown an increase in peri-operative mortality as a result of cementing the femoral component in patients requiring hip replacement following fracture of the proximal femur.

Between May 1998 and May 2007 we carried out 50 Avon patellofemoral joint replacements in 32 patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

There were no revisions in the first five years, giving a cumulative survival of 100% for those with a minimum follow-up of five years. The mean follow-up was 5.3 years (2.1 to 10.2). The median Oxford knee score was 30.5 (interquartile range 22.25 to 42.25). In patients with bilateral replacements the median Euroqol General health score was 50 which was significantly lower than that of 75 in those with a unilateral replacement (p = 0.047). The main complication was progression of disease, which was identified radiologically in 11 knees (22%). This highlights the need for accurate selection of patients. Our findings suggest that the Avon prosthesis survives well and gives a satisfactory functional outcome in the medium term.

We have carried out a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy of a single subacromial injection of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, tenoxicam, with a single injection of methylprednisolone in patients with subacromial impingement. A total of 58 patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A received 40 mg of methylprednisolone and group B 20 mg of tenoxicam as a subacromial injection along with lignocaine. The Constant-Murley shoulder score was used as the primary outcome measure and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) as secondary measures. Six weeks after injection the improvement in the Constant-Murley score was significantly greater in the methylprednisolone group (p = 0.003) than in the tenoxicam group. The improvement in the DASH score was greater in the steroid group and the difference was statistically significant and consistent two (p < 0.01), four (p < 0.01) and six weeks (p < 0.020) after the injection. The improvement in the OSS was consistently greater in the steroid group than in the tenoxicam group. Although the difference was statistically significant at two (p < 0.001) and four (p = 0.003) weeks after the injection, it was not at six weeks (p = 0.055). Subacromial injection of tenoxicam does not offer an equivalent outcome to subacromial injection of corticosteroid at six weeks. Corticosteroid is significantly better than tenoxicam for improving shoulder function in tendonitis of the rotator cuff after six weeks.