Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) complicates
between 0.5% and 1.2% primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and
may have devastating consequences. The traditional assessment of
patients suffering from PJI has involved the serological study of
inflammatory markers and microbiological analysis of samples obtained
from the joint space. Treatment has involved debridement and revision
arthroplasty performed in either one or two stages. We present an update on the burden of PJI, strategies for its
diagnosis and treatment, the challenge of resistant organisms and
the need for definitive evidence to guide the treatment of PJI after
THA. Cite this article:
The Unified Classification System (UCS) emphasises
the key principles in the assessment and management of peri-prosthetic
fractures complicating partial or total joint replacement. We tested the inter- and intra-observer agreement for the UCS
as applied to the pelvis and femur using 20 examples of peri-prosthetic
fracture in 17 patients. Each subtype of the UCS was represented
by at least one case. Specialist orthopaedic surgeons (experts)
and orthopaedic residents (pre-experts) assessed reliability on
two separate occasions. For the pelvis, the UCS showed inter-observer agreement of 0.837
(95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.798 to 0.876) for the experts and
0.728 (95% CI 0.689 to 0.767) for the pre-experts. The intra-observer
agreement for the experts was 0.861 (95% CI 0.760 to 0.963) and
0.803 (95% 0.688 to 0.918) for the pre-experts. For the femur, the
UCS showed an inter-observer kappa value of 0.805 (95% CI 0.765
to 0.845) for the experts and a value of 0.732 (95% CI 0.690 to 0.773)
for the pre-experts. The intra-observer agreement was 0.920 (95%
CI 0.867 to 0.973) for the experts, and 0.772 (95% CI 0.652 to 0.892)
for the pre-experts. This corresponds to a substantial and ‘almost
perfect’ inter- and intra-observer agreement for the UCS for peri-prosthetic
fractures of the pelvis and femur. We hope that unifying the terminology of these injuries will
assist in their assessment, treatment and outcome. Cite this article:
Advances in the treatment of periprosthetic joint
infections of the hip have once more pushed prosthesis preserving techniques
into the limelight. At the same time, the common infecting organisms
are evolving to become more resistant to conventional antimicrobial
agents. Whilst the epidemiology of resistant staphylococci is changing,
a number of recent reports have advocated the use of irrigation
and debridement and one-stage revision for the treatment of periprosthetic
joint infections due to resistant organisms. This review presents
the available evidence for the treatment of periprosthetic joint
infections of the hip, concentrating in particular on methicillin
resistant staphylococci. Cite this article:
