We compared implant and patient survival following intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IOPFFs) during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with matched controls. This retrospective cohort study compared 4831 hips with IOPFF and 48 154 propensity score matched primary THAs without IOPFF implanted between 2004 and 2016, which had been recorded on a national joint registry. Implant and patient survival rates were compared between groups using Cox regression.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to estimate the 90-day risk of revision for periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with design features of cementless femoral stems, and to investigate the effect of a collar on this risk using a biomechanical A total of 337 647 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) from the United Kingdom National Joint Registry (NJR) were included in a multivariable survival and regression analysis to identify the adjusted hazard of revision for periprosthetic fracture following primary THA using a cementless stem. The effect of a collar in cementless THA on this risk was evaluated in an Aims
Materials and Methods
This study aimed to evaluate implant survival of reverse hybrid
total hip arthroplasty (THA) at medium-term follow-up. A consecutive series of 1082 THAs in 982 patients with mean follow-up
of 7.9 years (5 to 11.3) is presented. Mean age was 69.2 years (21
to 94). Of these, 194 (17.9%) were in patients under 60 years, 663
(61.3%) in female patients and 348 (32.2%) performed by a trainee.
Head size was 28 mm in 953 hips (88.1%) or 32 mm in 129 hips (11.9%).
Survival analysis was performed and subgroups compared using log
rank tests.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to determine whether the rates of revision
for metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with Pinnacle
components varied according to the year of the initial operation,
and compare these with the rates of revision for other designs of
MoM THA. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales included
36 mm MoM THAs with Pinnacle acetabular components which were undertaken
between 2003 and 2012 with follow-up for at least five years (n
= 10 776) and a control group of other MoM THAs (n = 13 817). The
effect of the year of the primary operation on all-cause rates of revision
was assessed using Cox regression and interrupted time-series analysis.Aims
Patients and Methods
To determine the outcomes following revision surgery of metal-on-metal
hip arthroplasties (MoMHA) performed for adverse reactions to metal
debris (ARMD), and to identify factors predictive of re-revision. We performed a retrospective observational study using National
Joint Registry (NJR) data on 2535 MoMHAs undergoing revision surgery
for ARMD between 2008 and 2014. The outcomes studied following revision were
intra-operative complications, mortality and re-revision surgery.
Predictors of re-revision were identified using competing-risk regression
modelling.Aims
Patients and Methods
Few studies have assessed outcomes following non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty (non-MoMHA) revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). We assessed outcomes following non-MoMHA revision surgery performed for ARMD, and identified predictors of re-revision. We performed a retrospective observational study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. All non-MoMHAs undergoing revision surgery for ARMD between 2008 and 2014 were included (185 hips in 185 patients). Outcome measures following ARMD revision were intra-operative complications, mortality and re-revision surgery. Predictors of re-revision were identified using Cox regression.Objectives
Methods
The aims of this study were to compare the diagnostic test characteristics
of ultrasound alone, metal artefact reduction sequence MRI (MARS-MRI)
alone, and ultrasound combined with MARS-MRI for identifying intra-operative
pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MoMHR) patients
undergoing revision surgery. This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study involved 39 patients
(40 MoMHRs). The time between imaging modalities was a mean of 14.6
days (0 to 90), with imaging performed at a mean of 5.3 months (0.06
to 12) before revision. The prevalence of intra-operative pseudotumours
was 82.5% (n = 33).Aims
Methods
There is great variability in acetabular component
orientation following hip replacement. The aims of this study were
to compare the component orientation at impaction with the orientation
measured on post-operative radiographs and identify factors that
influence the difference between the two. A total of 67 hip replacements
(52 total hip replacements and 15 hip resurfacings) were prospectively
studied. Intra-operatively, the orientation of the acetabular component
after impaction relative to the operating table was measured using
a validated stereo-photogrammetry protocol. Post-operatively, the
radiographic orientation was measured; the mean inclination/anteversion
was 43° ( This study demonstrated that in order to achieve a specific radiographic
orientation target, surgeons should implant the acetabular component
5° less inclined and 8° more anteverted than their target. Great
variability (2 Cite this article:
The orientation of the acetabular component is
influenced not only by the orientation at which the surgeon implants
the component, but also the orientation of the pelvis at the time
of implantation. Hence, the orientation of the pelvis at set-up
and its movement during the operation, are important. During 67
hip replacements, using a validated photogrammetric technique, we
measured how three surgeons orientated the patient’s pelvis, how
much the pelvis moved during surgery, and what effect these had
on the final orientation of the acetabular component. Pelvic orientation
at set-up, varied widely (mean (± 2, standard deviation ( Cite this article:
