Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are capable of forming bone, cartilage and other mesenchymal tissues but are also important modulators of innate and adaptive immune responses. We have capitalized on these important functions to mitigate adverse responses when bone is exposed to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), or prolonged pro-inflammatory cytokines. Our goal was to optimize osteogenesis and mitigate persistent undesired inflammation by: 1. preconditioning MSCs by short term exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-α), 2. genetic modification of MSCs to overexpress Interleukin 4 (IL-4) either constitutively, or as NFκB-responsive IL-4 over-expression cells, and 3. training the MSCs (innate immune memory) by repeated stimulation with LPS. In the first experiment, bone marrow MSCs and macrophages were isolated from femurs and tibias of C57BL/6 mice. MSCs (1×104 cells) were seeded in 24-well transwell plates in the bottom chamber with MSC growth medium. MSCs were treated with 20 ng/ml TNF-α and 1–20 μg/ml LPS for three days. Primary macrophages (2 × 103 cells) were seeded to the insert of a separate transwell plate and polarized into the M1 phenotype. At day four, MSCs and macrophages were washed and the inserts with M1 macrophages were moved to the plates containing preconditioned MSCs at the bottom of the well. Co-culture was carried out in MSC growth medium for 24h. In the second experiment, bone marrow derived macrophages and MSCs were isolated from femora and tibiae of Balb/c male mice. 5×104 macrophages and 1×104 MSCs were seeded in the bottom well of the 24-well transwell plate. The upper chambers were seeded with unmodified MSCs, MSCs preconditioned with 20 ng/ml TNF-α and 20 mg/ml LPS for 3 days, NFκB-IL4 secreting MSCs (all 5×104 cells), or controls without MSCs. Co-culture was carried out in mixed osteogenic-macrophage media with clinically relevant polyethylene or titanium alloy particles. In the third experiment, bone marrow MSCs and macrophages were collected from femurs and tibias of C57BL/6 male mice. The MSCs were stimulated by LPS, washed out for five days, and re-stimulated by LPS in co-culture with macrophages. First, preconditioned MSCs enhanced anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage (Arginase 1 and CD206) expression, decreased pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage (TNF-α/IL-1Ra ratio) expression, and increased osteogenic markers (alkaline phosphatase expression and matrix mineralization) in co-culture. Second, NFκB-IL4 secreting MSCs decreased pro-inflammatory M1 (TNF-α), increased anti-inflammatory M2 (Arg1, IL-1ra) expression, and enhanced the expression of osteogenic factors Runx2 and alkaline phosphatase, in the presence of particles, compared to other groups. Third, LPS-trained MSCs increased anti-inflammatory (Arginase1 and CD206), and decreased the proinflammatory (TNF-α, IL1b, iNOS, and IL6) marker expression in MSC/macrophage co-culture. Transforming MSCs via the techniques of preconditioning, genetic modification, or training (innate immune memory) can modulate/convert a potentially injurious microenvironment to an anti-inflammatory pro-reconstructive milieu. These effects are highly relevant for bone healing in the presence of adverse stimuli. These concepts using transformed MSCs could also be extended to other organ systems subjected to potentially damaging agents.
Up to 10% of fractures result in undesirable outcomes, for which female sex is a risk factor. Cellular sex differences have been implicated in these different healing processes. Better understanding of the mechanisms underlying bone healing and sex differences in this process is key to improved clinical outcomes. This study utilized a macrophage–mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) coculture system to determine: 1) the precise timing of proinflammatory (M1) to anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophage transition for optimal bone formation; and 2) how such immunomodulation was affected by male A primary murine macrophage-MSC coculture system was used to demonstrate the optimal transition time from M1 to M2 (polarized from M1 with interleukin (IL)-4) macrophages to maximize matrix mineralization in male and female MSCs. Outcome variables included Alizarin Red staining, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and osteocalcin protein secretion.Objectives
Methods
Wear particles from joint replacements may result in loosening and periprosthetic osteolysis. Interference with systemic macrophage trafficking to the implant, modulation of macrophage phenotype from M1 to M2, and inhibition of NFκB may mitigate these adverse effects. Joint replacement of the lower extremity is highly successful in alleviating pain, and improving ambulation and function. However, prosthetic byproducts of different materials, in sufficient amounts, may lead to loosening and periprosthetic osteolysis. Debris from polymers (such as polyethylene and PMMA), metals and ceramics are capable of inciting an adverse tissue reaction, which is orchestrated by cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage. Three experimental approaches have been taken by our group to potentially mitigate the adverse biological sequela of particle disease. These include: 1) interfering with ongoing migration of monocyte/macrophages to the implant site by inhibiting the chemokine system 2) altering the functional activities of local macrophages by converting pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages to an anti-inflammatory pro-tissue healing M2 phenotype and 3) modulating the production and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and other potentially harmful factors by inhibiting the key transcription factor NFκB.Summary
Introduction
We treated 108 patients with a pertrochanteric femoral fracture using either the dynamic hip screw or the proximal femoral nail in this prospective, randomised series. We compared walking ability before fracture, intra-operative variables and return to their residence. Patients treated with the proximal femoral nail (n = 42) had regained their pre-operative walking ability significantly (p = 0.04) more often by the four-month review than those treated with the dynamic hip screw (n = 41). Peri-operative or immediate post-operative measures of outcome did not differ between the groups, with the exception of operation time. The dynamic hip screw allowed a significantly greater compression of the fracture during the four-month follow-up, but consolidation of the fracture was comparable between the two groups. Two major losses of reduction were observed in each group, resulting in a total of four revision operations. Our results suggest that the use of the proximal femoral nail may allow a faster postoperative restoration of walking ability, when compared with the dynamic hip screw.
