Background: The exact pathways of collagen remodeling in tendon tissue are not well understood. Therefore, we have established a 3D collagen gel system and studied the remodeling capacity of two different TSPC lines: young, Y-TSPC and aged/degenerative, A-TSPC. We specifically investigated the involvement of integrin receptors in the remodeling process. Methods: Y- and A-TSPC were derived from human Achilles tendon. RT-PCR was used to assess the expression of collagen-binding integrins. Integrins a1 and a11 were silenced by lentiviral delivery of shRNA in the Y-TSPC. Control-shRNA, a1-shRNA and a11-shRNA virus was given for 24h and then cells were selected with zeocin for 10 days. The integrin knockdown (KD) efficiency was assessed by quantitative PCR and western blotting. Last, time-lapse recording of gel contraction of Y-TSPC+con, Y-TSPC+a1KD, Y-TSPC+a11KD, and A-TSPC were performed. Results: Integrin a1 and a11 were significantly downregulated in A-TSPC. Therefore, to mimic the A-TSPC we carried out a1 and a11 KD in Y-TSPC. PCR and western blot validated very efficient KD. Analyses of collagen contraction revealed that Y-TSPC+a11KD had significant reduction in collagen contractibility comparable to A-TSPC phenotype. Regarding integrin a1, we found that this receptor had no effect on the contraction rate of TSPC. Thus, to our knowledge we have now identified for the first time a novel role of a11 integrin in tendon matrix remodeling, and a follow up analyses of the exact downstream cascade are on the way.

Tendons are dense connective tissues and critical components of the musculoskeletal system with known long repair process. Tissue engineering is a promising approach for achieving complete recovery of ruptured tendons. The most studies have focused on the combination of cells with various carriers; however, frequent times the biomaterials do not match the tissue organization and strength. For this reason, we first reviewed the literature for an alternative scaffold-free strategy for tendon engineering and second, we compared the cell sheet formation of two different cell types: bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) and tendon stem/progenitor cells (TSPCs). Methods: Literature search was performed in Pubmed using “tendon tissue engineering” and “scaffold-free” keywords and was limited to the last ten years. By using a 3-step protocol, BM-MSCs and TSPCs were induced to form cell sheets in 5 weeks. The sheets were compared by analysis for weight, diameter, cell density, tissue morphology (H&E and scoring) and cartilaginous matrix (DMMB and S.O. staining). Results: Scaffold-free models (cell sheets and pellet cultures) are available; however, further optimization is needed. Comparison between the two cell types clearly demonstrated that TSPCs form more mature cell sheet, while BMSCs form larger but less organized and differentiated sheet as judged by higher cell density and lower scoring outcome. Future efforts will focus on identifying mechanisms to speed BM-MSC sheet formation and maturation, which can in turn lead to development of new methodology for scaffold-free tendon tissue engineering.