The current study aimed to compare robotic arm-assisted (RA-THA), computer-assisted (CA-THA), and manual (M-THA) total hip arthroplasty regarding in-hospital metrics including length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, in-hospital complications, and cost of RA-THA versus M-THA and CA-THA versus M-THA, as well as trends in use and uptake over a ten-year period, and future projections of uptake and use of RA-THA and CA-THA. The National Inpatient Sample was queried for primary THAs (2008 to 2017) which were categorized into RA-THA, CA-THA, and M-THA. Past and projected use, demographic characteristics distribution, income, type of insurance, location, and healthcare setting were compared among the three cohorts. In-hospital complications, LOS, discharge disposition, and in-hospital costs were compared between propensity score-matched cohorts of M-THA versus RA-THA and M-THA versus CA-THA to adjust for baseline characteristics and comorbidities.Aims
Methods
Thresholds for operative eligibility based on body mass index (BMI) alone may restrict patient access to the benefits of arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between BMI and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to determine how many patients would have been denied improvements in PROMs if BMI cut-offs were to be implemented. A prospective cohort of 3,449 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. The following one-year PROMs were evaluated: hip injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) pain, HOOS Physical Function Shortform (PS), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity, Veterans Rand-12 Physical Component Score (VR-12 PCS), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (VR-12 MCS). Positive predictive values for failure to improve and the number of patients denied surgery in order to avoid a failed improvement were calculated for each PROM at different BMI cut-offs.Aims
Methods
Antibiotic-impregnated bone cement (AIBC) has been used for decades to treat and prevent post-operative infections in joint arthroplasty. Local delivery of antibiotics may theoretically have a bactericidal effect, however evidence supporting this is controversial and literature suggests its prophylactic use in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is seldom justified. With evolving standards of care, historical data is no longer relevant in addressing the efficacy of AIBC in the contemporary TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes following primary TKA using AIBC and regular non-AIBC by comparing rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI). A retrospective review was conducted of all cemented primary TKA procedures from a large institutional database between January 1, 2015 and December 31st, 2016. This identified 6,073 cases, n=2,613 in which AIBC was used and n=3,460 cases using bone cement without antibiotics. Patients were stratified into low risk and high-risk groups based on age (>65 years), BMI (>40), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; >3). Medical records were reviewed for diagnoses of SSI (skin and superficial wound infections) and PJI (deep joint infections requiring surgery) over a 2-year postoperative period. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression models were used to ascertain the effects of cement type, patient factors (age, gender, BMI, CCI), operative time, and length of stay on infection rates. Additionally, mixed models (adjusted for gender, age, race, BMI, and CCI) were built to account for surgeon variability.Introduction
Methods
