header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 42 - 42
1 Dec 2015
Branco P Paulo L Dias C Santos R Babulal J Moita M Marques T Martinho G Gonçalves L Mendes F
Full Access

This clinical case refers to a male patient, 45 years old, with a past medical history of Hepatitis C, admitted at the Emergency Department on July 2014, after a fall from 7 meters high at his workplace – dump – which resulted in an open fracture of the distal end of the right forearm bones – Gustillo & Anderson IIIA.

With this work, the authors aim to describe the evolution of the patient's clinical status, from the initial fracture to the septic arthritis of the right wrist, as also the surgical interventions and other treatments he has undergone.

There were used all patient's records from Hospital's archives, including Emergency Department registry, Clinical Diaries, Operative Reports, and results of diagnostic exams. It was also revised all patient's clinical process, with support of photographs obtained during the successive revaluations.

The clinical case we present on this work began on July 2014, when the patient suffered an open fracture – Gustillo & Anderson IIIA – on the distal end of the right forearm bones.

The lesion was subjected to washing, closed reduction and internal fixation with Kirschner wires, and also a cycle of antibiotic.

At the fourth day after surgery, because of an unfavorable evolution of the wound, the patient was submitted to a bulky abscess drainage and a joint osteotaxis.

About 1 month and a half after the traumatic event, it was performed a revision of the osteotaxis, following a failed attempt of osteosynthesis.

By unfavorable evolution of the clinical status, with the development of septic arthritis in the right wrist, it was decided to undertake a Masquelet technique.

Analyzing the evolution of the patient's clinical status, the authors conclude that, besides the appropriate therapeutic options taken at each stage, the development of septic arthritis at the right wrist was inevitable.

This framework, in association to the fact that this is a 45 years old patient, with the dominant hand affected, raises issues of questionable therapeutic order.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 74 - 74
1 Dec 2015
Branco P Paulo L Dias C Santos R Babulal J Moita M Marques T Martinho G Tomaz L Mendes F
Full Access

The clinical case refers to a male patient, 34 years old, admitted at the Emergency Department after a fall of 2 meters. Of that trauma, resulted an exposed Monteggia fracture type III – Gustillo & Anderson IIA – on his left arm.

With this work, the authors intend to describe the evolution of the patient's clinical condition, as well as the surgical procedures he was submitted to.

The authors used the patient's records from Hospital's archives, namely from the Emergency Department, Operating Room, Infirmary and Consultation, and also the diagnostic exams performed throughout the patient's clinical evolution.

The clinical case began in December 2011, when the patient suffered a fall of 2 meters in his workplace. From the evaluation in the Emergency Department, it was concluded that the patient presented, at the left forearm, an exposed Monteggia type III fracture – Gustillo & Anderson IIA – combined with a comminuted fracture of the radial head. At the admission day, the wound site was thoroughly rinsed, the fracture was reduced and immobilized with an above-the-elbow cast, and antibiotics were initiated. Six days after admission, the patient was submitted to open reduction with internal fixation with plate and screws of the fracture of the ulna and radial head arthroplasty. The postoperative period was uneventful. Two months after the surgical procedure, inflammatory signals appeared with purulent secretion in the ulnar suture. Accordingly, the patient was submitted to fistulectomy, rinsing of the surgical site and a cycle of antibiotics with Vancomycin, directed to the S. aureus isolated from the purulent secretion. The clinical evolution was unfavorable, leading to the appearance of a metaphyseal pseudarthrosis or the ulna and dislocation of the radial head prosthesis. The previously implanted material was therefore removed, 4 months after the traumatic event; at the same time an external fixation device was applied and the first part of a Masquelet Technique was conducted. The second part of the aforementioned procedure was carried out in December 2012. The patient was discharged from the consultation after a 2 years follow-up, with a range of motion of the left elbow acceptable for his daily living activities.

In spite of the multiple surgical rinsing procedures and directed antibiotics, the development of a metaphyseal pseudarthrosis of the ulna was inevitable. This clinical case illustrates how the Masquelet Technique presents itself as a good solution for the cases of non-union of fractures in the context of infection.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 39 - 39
1 Dec 2015
Branco P Paulo L Santos R Babulal J Moita M Marques T Martinho G Infante F Gonçalves L Mendes F
Full Access

This work refers to a male patient, 25 years of age, admitted in the Emergency Department following a bicycle accident, of which resulted an open fracture of the right forearm bones – Gustillo & Anderson I.

With this work, the authors have as objective the description of the patient's clinical condition – starting with the fracture, over to the osteomyelitis – as well as the surgical procedures and remaining treatments he was submitted to.

The authors used the patient's records from Hospital's archives, namely records from the Emergency Department, Operating Room, Infirmary and Consultation, and also the diagnostic exams performed throughout the patient's clinical evolution.

This clinical case began in May 2013, when the patient suffered an open fracture of the right forearm bones – Gustillo & Anderson I – due to a bicycle accident. At the time, the exposure site was thoroughly rinsed, a cast immobilization was made, and antibiotics were prescribed. In the fifth day following the trauma, the patient was submitted to an open reduction with internal fixation with plate and screws of both forearm bones. In the following period, the distal segment of the suture suffered necrosis, exposing the radial plate and the tendons of the first dorsal compartment. The Plastic Surgery team was then contacted, proposing the execution of a graft over the exposed area, which was made in August 2013. In the postoperative period, about half the graft lost its viability and it was noted that a radial pseudoarthrosis had developed – in the context of osteomyelitis – with a defect of about 9 centimeters. This condition prompted the extraction of the osteosynthesis material, about 4 months after its application, and at the same time the first stage of a Masquelet Technique was performed. The second stage of the aforementioned procedure was carried out two months later. Currently, the patient is clinically stable, with right hand mobility acceptable for his daily living activities.

Analyzing the patient's clinical evolution, we concluded that, even though the adequate therapeutic decisions have been made in each stage, the development of osteomyelitis was inevitable. This realization, in association with the patient's young age, raises debatable questions of therapeutic order.