There have been no studies assessing the acceptability of opioid tapering in the pre-arthroplasty setting. This qualitative study aimed to (1) explore barriers and facilitators to opioid tapering amongst patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), and (2) explore the similarities and differences in acceptability of opioid tapering between pre-arthroplasty patients and those participating in a biopsychosocial pain management program.

From January 2021, adult participants diagnosed with CNCP and taking opioids daily (any dose at time of screening for a period of 3 months) were recruited from either Fairfield Orthopaedic Hip and Knee Service (FOHKS) or Liverpool Hospital Pain Clinic (LHPC). Semi-structured interviews underwent thematic analysis using the framework method.

17 participants were recruited (FOHKS, n=9, mean age 67, female 77%, LHPC, n=8, mean age 54, female 63%). Both groups had participants who; (i) were reluctant to use opioid medications and used them out of “necessity”, (ii) were reluctant to taper due to concerns of worsening pain, quality of life, (iii) believed opioids were “toxins” causing bodily harm. Some FOHKS participants believed tapering should be a post-operative focus, whilst others believed tapering opioids pre-operatively will assist in post-op pain management. Few LHPC participants felt dependent/addicted to opioids, thus driving their intention to taper opioids.

The belief of tapering opioids causing worse pain was based on either previous experiences or concerns alone. Some FOHKS participants were more inclined to taper opioids if they were educated on the chronic and peri-operative risks associated with using opioids at time of arthroplasty.

Opioid users recognise the harms associated with chronic opioid use and believe they are used out of desperation for adequate analgesia, function, and quality of life. Tapering opioids in the pre-arthroplasty context may need coupling with patient education highlighting the importance of opioid tapering pre-operatively.

Introduction

Open tibial fractures are associated with an increased risk of infection. The infection rate increases with increasing severity and grade of fracture. Various management options available for fracture treatment are in turn associated with complications including infection. Circular fine-wire fixators cause minimal intra-operative soft tissue disruption and possibly have a better outcome and low complication rates.

Introduction

We present our experience of lower limb reconstruction for patients with obvious defects in the tibia, by bone transport using a stacked Taylor Spatial Frame.

Developments in adjuvant therapies and surgical techniques have allowed more confident excision of the neoplastic scapula without radical margins. Total scapular excision has been proven to be an effective limb salvage procedure for tumours involving the whole scapula, with or without gleno-humeral extension. The two most common types of excision are the Tikhoff-Linberg procedure or total scapulectomy.

We identified 13 patients who had undergone total scapular excision between 1995 and 2008. Eight patients underwent total scapulectomy and five underwent a Tikhoff-Linberg procedure. All reconstructions were in the form of humeral suspension. There were four females and nine males with a mean age at operation of 47.7 years (range 16-81). Most tumours excised were either Ewing's sarcoma or chondrosarcoma and mean follow-up was 44 months (7-167). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH). Active flexion and abduction ranges were also assessed.

Of the original 13 patients, five died at a mean of 21 months post-operatively. One patient developed a recurrence after five months, which was successfully excised. The mean forward flexion and abduction following all procedures was 22.5 degrees (0-30) and 22.9 degrees (0-40) respectively. There was no statistical difference between ranges of motion of total scapulectomy and Tikhoff-Linberg procedures. The mean MSTS score for the entire group was 65.8% and there was no statistical difference between total scapulectomy and Tikhoff-Linberg (p = 0.69). The mean DASH score for all patients was 39.7 with no statistically significant difference between the two procedures (p = 0.46).

Both procedures allow successful excision of scapular tumours with an acceptable level of post-operative function. Total scapulectomy and Tikhoff-Linberg procedures followed by humeral suspension compare favourably with forequarter amputation, endoprosthetic reconstruction and allografting.

We present our experience of lower limb reconstruction for patients with obvious defects in the tibia, by bone transport using a stacked Taylor Spatial Frame.

A retrospective review of 40 patients treated between 2003 and 2009. There were 19 cases of infected non union, 9 cases of acute bone loss following fracture, 6 cases of chronic osteomyelitis, 4 cases of aseptic non union, 1 case of neurofibromatosis and 1 case of a loose and infected total ankle replacement.

Twenty-eight out of the 40 patients reviewed have completed their treatment. Of these 28 patients, bony union was achieved in 23 patients, of whom 22 were assessed at discharge to have regained good to excellent limb function, a functional assessment was not available for review in the remaining patient.

In 5 patients, docking site union failed, 3 of whom then underwent below knee amputation. Two patients required treatment with an intramedullary nail following frame treatment to achieve consolidated union of the docking site.

Anatomic sagittal and coronal alignment was achieved in 19 out of 23 patients.

The mean bone regenerate was 53.3 mm (range: 15-180mm), with a mean healing index of 9.2 days/mm (range: 4.4-25 days/mm)

The majority of patients experienced at least one complication, these included pin site and soft tissue infections, refracture, nerve palsy and joint stiffness. Surgical stimulation of the docking site was required in 12 of the 28 patients to promote union.

The use of a stacked Taylor Spatial Frame system is effective for restoring bone length and limb function in patients with bone loss following complex trauma and orthopaedic cases. The computer assisted nature of the spatial frame allows for predictable bone regenerate, minimal residual deformity and accurate bone docking