Core decompression (CD) is effective to relieve pain and delay the advent of total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, the influence of CD on the subsequent THA has not been determined yet. Literatures published up to and including November 2018 were searched in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library databases with predetermined terms. Comparative studies of the clinical outcomes between conversion to THA with prior CD (the Prior CD group) and primary THA (the Control group) for ONFH were included. Data was extracted systematically and a meta- analysis was performed.Background
Methods
Bone and joint infections are not only common but their management can be technically complex. They carry significant healthcare costs and are a daunting experience for patients [1]. Frequently, multiple operations are required in order to treat the infection. Each surgical intervention usually results in greater bone loss, worsening skin and soft tissue scarring and increasingly diverse and resistant micro- organisms [2]. Specialist bone infection units involving highly integrated orthopaedic and plastic surgery, as well as infection physicians, may improve patient outcomes [3–4]. However, it is difficult to determine the hierarchy of factors contributing to outcome of treatment. This problem is confounded by a lack of structured, prospective data collection in many units around the world. In 2014, we designed a modular database which allows collection of patients’ details, components of the disease, the treatment, microbiology, histology, clinical outcome and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS). The registry was implemented in November 2014 and has already demonstrated its function as a Hospital-wide service evaluation tool. Over 200 patients have been referred to the unit and their baseline demographic information registered. Their progress through the bone infection unit patient pathway is prospectively monitored with use of the registry and data collection ongoing. We aim to present the preliminary clinical outcomes of these 200 patients including surgical procedures performed, key microbiology results, antibiotic treatment regimens and patient reported outcomes. Our goal is to demonstrate that a bone infection registry is an integral part of infection management clinical practice. It can be used for designing service provision, assist in allocating healthcare resources and expand the evidence base for specialist bone infection units in managing complex orthopaedic infections.
The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) for peripheral nerve injuries1 states: “A careful examination of the peripheral nervous and vascular systems must be performed and clearly recorded for all injuries. This examination must be repeated and recorded after any manipulation or surgery.” This study investigated whether this standard was met for patients with upper limb trauma at a busy London Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department. Data was gathered prospectively from A&E admission notes for 30 consecutive patients with upper limb injuries from the week beginning 11th March 2013. Eligibilty: All patients with upper limb injuries.Background
Method
