header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 27 - 27
1 Nov 2021
Gehrke T Althaus L Linke P Salber J Krenn V Citak M
Full Access

Arthrofibrosis is a relatively frequent complication after total knee arthroplasty. Although stiffness after total hip arthroplasty (THA), because of formation of heterotopic ossification or other causes, is not uncommon, to the authors’ best knowledge, arthrofibrosis after THA has not been described. The aim of this study is to describe the arthrofibrosis of the hip after primary total hip arthroplasty using an established clinical and histological classification of arthrofibrosis.

We retrospectively examined all patients who were histologically confirmed to have arthrofibrosis after primary THA during revision surgery by examination of tissue samples in our clinic. Arthrofibrosis was diagnosed according to the histopathological SLIM-consensus classification, which defines seven different SLIM types of the periimplant synovial membrane. The SLIM type V determines the diagnosis of endoprosthesis-associated arthrofibrosis.

The study population consists of 66 patients who were revised due to arthrofibrosis after primary THA. All patients had a limitation in range of motion prior to revision with a mean flexion of 90° (range from 40 to 125), mean internal rotation of 10° (range from 0 to 40) and mean external rotation of 20° (range from 0 to 50). All patients had histological SLIM type V arthrofibrosis, corresponding to endoprosthesis-associated arthrofibrosis. Histological examination revealed that seven patients (10.6%) had particle-induced and 59 patients (89.4%) had non-particle-induced arthrofibrosis.

This is the first decription of endoprosthetic-associated arthrofibrosis after primary THA on the basis of a well-established histological classification. Our study results could enable new therapeutic and diagnostic opportunities in patients with such an arthrofibrosis. Surgeons should keep arthrofibrosis as a possible cause for stiffness and pain after primary total hip arthroplasty in mind. Level of evidence Diagnostic study, Level of Evidence IV

Thorsten Gehrke and Lara Althaus contributed equally to the writing of this manuscript.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1479 - 1488
1 Nov 2016
Kalson NS Borthwick LA Mann DA Deehan DJ Lewis P Mann C Mont MA Morgan-Jones R Oussedik S Williams FMK Toms A Argenson JN Bellemans J Bhave A Furnes O Gollwitzer H Haddad FS Hofmann S Krenn V

Aims

The aim of this consensus was to develop a definition of post-operative fibrosis of the knee.

Patients and Methods

An international panel of experts took part in a formal consensus process composed of a discussion phase and three Delphi rounds.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 64 - 64
1 Mar 2006
Schroeder J Morawietz L Matziolis G Leutloff D Gehrke T Krenn V Perka C
Full Access

Despite all gain of knowledge, septic and aseptic loosening of endoprostheses still remain unsolved problems. In loosening of joint arthroplasty a periprosthetic membrane is found between the bone and the loosened implant. The characteristics of the membrane are influenced by the process that leads to the loosening of the endoprosthesis. The aim of the study was to introduce a classification system that enables a standardized diagnostic evaluation and helps to determine the aetiology of the loosening process.

Based on histomorphological criteria and polarized light microscopy, four types of periprosthetic membranes were defined: periprosthetic membranes of the wear particle type (type I), periprosthetic membranes of the infectious type (type II), periprosthetic membranes of the combined type (type III), and periprosthetic membranes of the indifferent type (type IV). Periprosthetic membranes of 268 patients were analyzed according to the defined criteria.

The interobserver reproducibility was sufficient (95%). The correlation between histopathological and microbiological diagnosis was high (89%, p< 0,001). The four types of periprosthetic membranes showed a significantly different time of revision.

This classification system enables a standardized diagnostic procedure. It therefore is a basis for further studies concerning the etiology and pathogenesis of prosthesis loosening. The reliability of this histomorphological examination in diagnosing infections is currently reviewed.