Urinary catheterization in the postoperative period is known to increase the risk of deep joint infection following arthroplasty. A number of studies have attempted to elucidate the individual patient factors and surgical procedural factors which predispose patients to postoperative urinary retention.

We conducted a retrospective observational study of three hundred patients to specifically determine the effect of the anaesthetic technique on the incidence of urinary retention following elective lower limb arthroplasty. One hundred consecutive patients were surveyed in each of three groups differing by the type of the anaesthetic technique and the drug administered; 1) general anaesthesia with femoral nerve block, 2) spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal fentanyl, and 3) spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal morphine.

The incidence of urinary retention requiring catheterisation in male patients receiving intrathecal morphine was 58% compared with 10% and 6% for those who had general anaesthesia with femoral nerve block and intrathecal fentanyl, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). The incidence of urinary retention in females across all groups was =2%. The average residual volume of urine following catheterisation was 750ml (460-1500ml).

Our findings show that the use of intrathecal morphine greatly increases the risk of postoperative urinary retention in male patients, whereas no significant increase was found amongst female patients. This risk should be carefully considered when choosing the type of intraoperative anaesthetic/analgesic combination employed in male patients and be rationalised against the intended benefits to the patient.

Background

Cam-type femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is increasingly recognised as a cause of mechanical hip symptoms in young adults. It is likely that it is a cause of early hip degeneration. Ganz et al have developed a therapeutic procedure involving trochanteric flip osteotomy and dislocation of the hip, and have reported good results. We have developed an arthroscopic osteochondroplasty to reshape the proximal femur and relieve impingement.

Background

Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is increasingly recognised as a cause of mechanical hip symptoms in sportspersons. In femoro-acetabular impingement abnormal contact occurs between the proximal femur and the acetabular rim during terminal motion of the hip as a result of abnormal morphologic features involving the proximal femur (CAM) or the acetabulum (Pincer) or both (Mixed) leading to lesions of acetabular labrum and the adjacent acetabular cartilage. It is likely that it is a cause of early hip degeneration. Ganz developed a therapeutic procedure involving trochanteric flip osteotomy and dislocation of the hip, and have reported good results. We have developed an arthroscopic technique to reshape the proximal femur and remove prominent antero-superior acetabular rim thereby relieving impingement.

Introduction

In patients with shoulder pain one of the important initial determinations is to assess the integrity of the rotator cuff. Clinical examination is often inconclusive. Compared with MRI and arthrography, ultrasound allows dynamic evaluation, is non-invasive, less expensive, less time-consuming and more acceptable to patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of high resolution shoulder ultrasonography compared with arthroscopy in a series of consecutive patients with clinically suspected rotator cuff disease.

Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures above a Total Knee Arthroplasty remains a challenge. The different treatment options available include casting for undisplaced fractures, ORIF for a displaced fracture with a well-fixed implant or revision arthroplasty for a very distal fracture and for a fracture with a loose implant.

We describe our experience in treating a very distal displaced supracondylar fracture above a well-fixed femoral component in a 68-year-old woman who was recently diagnosed with breast carcinoma and awaiting mastectomy. There was no evidence of metastatic disease. The knee replacement was done 4 years before and the patient did not have any symptoms in the knee prior to the fall. Conventional ORIF with IM nailing or plate osteosynthesis was not possible due to the very distal site of the fracture.

We used a custom modified 95 degree angled blade plate in which a slot was cut in the middle of the blade halfway along its length to accommodate the pegs of the femoral component in the distal fragment. The fracture was reduced and fixed with the angled blade plate restoring length, alignment, and providing coronal stability. The patient had a satisfactory union at 3 months without deformity giving a good range of pain free movement in the knee.

DCS and 95 degree angled blade plate have been used in the past with mixed results. The lag screw or the blade has to be inserted more proximally to avoid the femoral component and so the distal fixation is often sub optimal. In our case modification of the blade allowed more distal placement providing optimal fixation and avoiding complex revision surgery.

Introduction: Chondral lesions are the second most common pathology encountered during hip arthroscopy. Microfracture is a simple and effective technique to treat chondral lesions with proven long term results in the knee. However, there is little evidence to confirm the ability of microfracture to produce repair tissue in hip joint.

Methods: Patients with acetabular chondral defect treated with microfracture during primary arthroscopy and who had a subsequent hip arthroscopy enabling visualisation of the treated chondral defect were included in the study. Over a three year period 185 patients had microfracture for treatment of full thickness chondral defect. 11 patients (8 males and 3 females) with a mean age of 35 years (range 17–54 years) who had revision hip arthroscopy form the study population. The size of chondral defect was measured at the time of primary arthroscopy. Microfracture was performed using arthroscopic awls with a standard technique. Postoperatively a strict rehabilitation protocol was followed. The extent and quality of repair tissue was assessed by visual inspection at second look arthroscopy

Results: All patients had chondral lesions confined to the antero-superior aspect of the acetabulum with an associated labral tear. None had diffuse osteoarthritis. The average defect measured 180 mm2 (range 50–300). The mean time interval between primary and revision arthroscopy was 12 months. Excluding one failure the overall percent fill of the defects was 95% (range 75 – 100) with good quality cartilage.

Discussion: Only one other series has reported on the macroscopic results of microfracture in the hip. Our series agrees with the results of those authors. These similar results from 2 centres confirm that arthroscopic microfracture is an effective treatment for acetabular chondral lesions in carefully selected patients.

Introduction: Accurate templating prior to hip replacement requires that the magnification of the radiograph is known. This magnification is usually measured using a scale marker ball or disc of known diameter, but this method is inaccurate when the marker is not precisely positioned in the coronal plane of the hips.

Our aims were to design a novel scale marker which does not require such precise positioning, and to compare the accuracy of this new marker with a standard single ball marker.

Methods: The new marker consists of two separate markers: one behind the patient’s pelvis, the other at the front. It can be shown that the radiographic magnification of such markers is consistently related to the magnification of the hips.

The posterior marker consists of a 75x75cm square foam mat, incorporating multiple 25.4mm metal rods arranged in series down the centre. The anterior marker is made from five 25.4mm steel balls, linked in series at 20mm intervals. The mat is positioned just underneath the patient’s pelvis as they lie supine for their radiograph. The five balls are placed in the midline over the patient’s suprapubic region, and the x-ray is then taken. The radiographic dimensions of the ball and rod which are located between the hips are then measured. The magnification of the hips may then be calculated from these dimensions using a simple equation.

To validate the new “double” marker, it was compared with a conventional single marker ball. 74 hip arthroplasty patients undergoing routine radiographic follow up were recruited. Both the new double marker and the single marker were applied at the time of x-ray, the magnification according to each was calculated, and these were compared to the true radiographic magnification as determined from the known dimensions of the prosthesis. All markers were positioned by independent radiographers trained in their use.

Results: The correlation between true and predicted magnification was excellent using the double marker (r=0.90), but only moderate for the single marker (r=0.50). The median error of the single marker was 4.8%, but only 1.1% for the double marker (p< 0.001). The reliability of the double marker as a predictor of true magnification was very good (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC=0.89), but was poor for the single marker (ICC=0.32). The accuracy of the double marker was unaffected by the patient’s body mass index. The inter and intraobserver variability of the new method were both excellent (ICC> 0.94).

Discussion: The double marker method is significantly more accurate and reliable than the single marker method when used in a clinical setting, as it does not rely on precise positioning of the marker by the user. We believe that this technique may become the gold standard method of calculating radiographic hip magnification in clinical practice.

Introduction: Clinical communication and research across centres will be facilitated by an easy to use and reliable method to describe lesions within the hip. This requires a system for describing location and a system for describing pathology. We present a hip mapping system for describing location, which has been used to map more than 2000 therapeutic hip arthroscopies to date and tested for ease of use and inter-observer reliability.

Method: The articular surfaces of acetabulum and femoral head are divided into zones. The femoral head has a medial zone around the fovea (A) approximately 2.5 cm in diameter. Lines radiating from the fovea at 90-degree intervals divide the remaining head into equally sized posterior, superior, anterior and inferior zones (B, C, D, E respectively).

The acetabular surface is divided radially into five zones (A, B, C, D, E) starting postero-inferior (A) and ending antero-inferior (E). Each zone is further divided in half into an outer and inner zone, forming ten zones in total i.e Ai, Ao, Bi, Bo.etc.

This study was performed during therapeutic hip arthroscopy of 41 patients. Five surgeons took part in the study. After gaining access into the hip joint one of the surgeons identified three small intra-articular features (marks, small defects or blood clots) as X, Y and Z to some or all of the other 4 surgeons. Each of the other surgeons examined the hip independently without Discussion: and recorded the location on a hip map. If two surgeons had observed a point, this provided one pair to assess agreement; three or four surgeons provided three or six pairs respectively. Each observation of a point by a pair of surgeons (a point-pair) provided one opportunity for assessment of agreement.

Results: In total 103 points were mapped by two, three or four surgeons giving 286 point-pairs for assessment. In 263 cases (92%), the pair of surgeons were in agreement, designating the point as within the same zone. On 23 (8%) occasions, there was disagreement but always across a boundary between adjacent zones. Disagreements were more common about points on the femoral head (12) than on the acetabulum (11). Seven of these were the boundary between femoral zone A and one of the other zones (B, C, D). Disagreements in acetabulum occurred equally at each radial boundary (A/B-2, B/C-3, C/D-2, D/E-2) but only rarely between inner and outer acetabular zones (2 point-pairs).

All surgeons reported that they found the system easy to use. There was no difference in the level of disagreement between more and less experienced surgeons or a learning effect with time.

Conclusion: Inter-observer reliability of this mapping system was 92%. Disagreements all occurred at boundaries between zones especially on the femoral head where zones are difficult to define in the absence of landmarks. This study supports the use of a zone based mapping system in clinical practice.

Introduction: Chondral lesions are the second most common pathology encountered during hip arthroscopy and can cause substantial morbidity and functional limitation. Microfracture is a simple and effective technique to treat chondral lesions. Studies have shown good long term results in the knee. However there is little evidence to confirm the ability of microfracture to produce repair tissue in hip joint

Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older who had a full thickness acetabular chondral defect treated with microfracture during primary arthroscopy and who had a subsequent hip arthroscopy enabling visualisation of the treated chondral defect were included in the study. Over a three year period 185 patients had microfracture for treatment of full thickness chondral defect. 11 patients (8 males and 3 females) with a mean age of 35 years (range 17–54 years) who had revision hip arthroscopy for various reasons form the study population. The size of chondral defect was measured at the time of primary arthroscopy. Microfracture was performed using arthroscopic awls with a standard technique. Postoperatively a strict rehabilitation protocol was followed with no weight bearing allowed for six weeks. The extent and quality of repair tissue was assessed by visual inspection at second look arthroscopy

Results: All acetabular chondral lesions were identified in the antero-superior quadrant at primary arthroscopy. The average defect after debridement measured 180 mm2 (range 50–300 mm2). 10 patients had chondral lesions confined to the acetabulum. 1 patient had a large femoral head defect in addition, due to Avascular Necrosis. None of the patients had diffuse osteoarthritis. All patients had an associated labral tear. The mean time interval between the primary and revision arthroscopy was 12 months. Excluding 1 failure the overall percent fill of the defects was 95% (range 75 – 100%) with good quality (Grade 1) cartilage. There was one failure with only a 25% fill. In that particular patient a large flap of delaminated cartilage was not resected at primary arthroscopy. Instead microfracture was done under the flap in the hope of encouraging the cartilage to stick to the underlying bone. Unfortunately the cartilage continued to remain delaminated and also hindered the formation of new repair tissue.

Conclusion: Only one other series of second look arthroscopy after microfracture has been reported. Our series agrees with the results of those authors. These similar results from 2 centres confirm that arthroscopic microfracture is an effective treatment for acetabular chondral lesions in carefully selected patients.

Background: Acetabular labral tears are increasingly recognised as a cause of hip pain in young adults and middle aged patients. Degenerative acetabular conditions and sporting activities can cause labral injury. Recent interest has focussed on anterior femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of labral injury, progressive articular cartilage damage and secondary osteoarthritis. Labral tears are difficult to diagnose clinically or with conventional radiographic techniques.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of MR arthrography in locating labral tears and articular cartilage defects compared with hip arthroscopy.

Materials and Methods: 200 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of acetabular labral tear underwent hip arthroscopy. All of them had a preoperative Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram done by a single musculoskeletal radiologist using a standard protocol. The labrum was assessed for abnormalities of morphology and signal intensity. Acetabular articular cartilage defects were expressed as a reduction in joint space. All hip arthroscopies were done by a single surgeon after a trial period of conservative therapy consisting of activity modification, physiotherapy and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications. All procedures were recorded digitally and documented in an operative report. Labral tears and acetabular cartilage abnormalities were described by location and appearance.

Results: Comparison of MRA and hip arthroscopy findings demonstrate MRA to have a sensitivity of 100%, positive predictive value of 99%, negative predictive value of 100% and accuracy of 99% in predicting labral tears. MRA correctly identified the location of labral tears in 90% of cases. Acetabular cartilage abnormalities were under recognised by MRA (43 hips on MRA vs 54 hips on arthroscopy). MRA was not sensitive enough to pick up early delamination of cartilage adjacent to labral tear in 6 hips.

Conclusion: Hip MRA with radial reformatting has high accuracy rates in diagnosing and localising hip labral lesions.

Background: Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is increasingly recognised as a cause of mechanical hip symptoms in sportspersons. In femoro-acetabular impingement abnormal contact occurs between the proximal femur and the acetabular rim during terminal motion of the hip as a result of abnormal morphologic features involving the proximal femur (CAM) or the acetabulum (Pincer) or both (Mixed) leading to lesions of acetabular labrum and the adjacent acetabular cartilage. It is likely that it is a cause of early hip degeneration. Ganz developed a therapeutic procedure involving trochanteric flip osteotomy and dislocation of the hip, and have reported good results. We have developed an arthroscopic technique to reshape the proximal femur and remove prominent antero-superior acetabular rim thereby relieving impingement.

Methods: Twelve patients presented with mechanical hip symptoms and had demonstrable cam-type (eight patients) or mixed (four patients) FAI on radially-reconstructed MR arthrography, were treated by arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty and acetabular rim resection if indicated. All patients were competing at the highest level in their respective sport (football, rugby and athletics). All patients were followed up and post-operative Non-Arthritic Hip Scores (NAHS, maximum possible score 100) compared with pre-operative NAHS.

Results: There were no complications. All patients were asked to be partially weight-bearing with crutches for four weeks and most returned to training within six weeks. All of them returned to competitive sports by 14 weeks. Symptoms improved in all patients, with mean NAHS improving from 72 preoperatively to 97 at 3 months.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic reshaping to relieve FAI is feasible, safe and reliable. However it is technically difficult and time-consuming. The results are comparable to open dislocation and debridement, but avoid the prolonged disability and the complications associated with trochanteric flip osteotomy. This is important in elite athletes as they can return to training and competitive sports much quicker with less morbidity.

Introduction: Multiple scoring systems are available to evaluate arthritic hip pain and to assess outcome after arthroplasty. These scores focus on evaluating hip pain and function in elderly patients with degenerative joint disease. They are not specific for sports-related or mechanical hip symptoms in young people, or sensitive to change after new treatments such as arthroscopic hip surgery.

Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature since 1980, searching for systems used to measure severity of symptoms and outcome of treatment in these patients. We collected reports of performance of these systems. We then used the best of them to collect symptom scores from 200 patients, and measured the agreement of systems. We performed an item reduction process to identify the question items most associated with overall scores.

Results: Systematic review yielded 4 scoring systems which have been used to evaluate sports-related or mechanical hip symptoms: the Non-arthritic Hip Score (NHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)and a modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). All scores are self administered and symptom related, requiring no physical examination. All but the mHHS have some evidence of reliability and validity. There is a great deal of overlap among the variables selected by the authors and agreement between the various scoring systems is surprisingly good. Most of the variability of all of the systems could be captured with ten simple questions.

Conclusion: We have developed a simple set of ten questions which capture outcome information as well as existing more complex systems. This will be useful is assessing outcome after new treatments such as hip arthroscopy in young active people.

We have carried out a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy of a single subacromial injection of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, tenoxicam, with a single injection of methylprednisolone in patients with subacromial impingement. A total of 58 patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A received 40 mg of methylprednisolone and group B 20 mg of tenoxicam as a subacromial injection along with lignocaine. The Constant-Murley shoulder score was used as the primary outcome measure and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) as secondary measures. Six weeks after injection the improvement in the Constant-Murley score was significantly greater in the methylprednisolone group (p = 0.003) than in the tenoxicam group. The improvement in the DASH score was greater in the steroid group and the difference was statistically significant and consistent two (p < 0.01), four (p < 0.01) and six weeks (p < 0.020) after the injection. The improvement in the OSS was consistently greater in the steroid group than in the tenoxicam group. Although the difference was statistically significant at two (p < 0.001) and four (p = 0.003) weeks after the injection, it was not at six weeks (p = 0.055). Subacromial injection of tenoxicam does not offer an equivalent outcome to subacromial injection of corticosteroid at six weeks. Corticosteroid is significantly better than tenoxicam for improving shoulder function in tendonitis of the rotator cuff after six weeks.

We have developed a novel method of calculating the radiological magnification of the hip using two separate radio-opaque markers. We recruited 74 patients undergoing radiological assessment following total hip replacement. Both the new double marker and a conventional single marker were used by the radiographer at the time of x-ray. The predicted magnification according to each marker was calculated, as was the true radiological magnification of the components. The correlation between true and predicted magnification was good using the double marker (r = 0.90, n = 74, p < 0.001), but only moderate for the single marker (r = 0.50, n = 63, p < 0.001). The median error was significantly less for the double marker than for the single (1.1% vs 4.8%, p < 0.001). The double marker method demonstrated excellent validity (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89), in contrast to the single marker (0.32).

The double marker method appears to be superior to the single marker method when used in the clinical environment.

Subacromial corticosteroid injection has been shown to be effective in treating impingement syndrome. The exact mechanism of action is not clear but it may be due to its anti-inflammatory properties. However, there are potential side effects of steroid injection including tendon weakening, dermal atrophy and infection. NSAIDs may offer similar anti-inflammatory properties but without the side effects of corticosteroids. Tenoxicam is a long-acting water soluble NSAID and is available without irritant preservatives. Studies have shown that peri-articular Tenocixam injection was useful in treating painful shoulders and local tolerability was good.

The aim of this study is to carry out a blinded ran-domised controlled study comparing subacromial Tenoxicam injection (NSAID) against methylprednisolone (steroid) injection in patients with clinical subacromial impingement syndrome.

The study protocol was approved by local research ethics committee. Patients over 18 with a clinical diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome were considered eligible to this study. Patients with other known causes of shoulder pain, contraindication or sensitivity to NSAID and pregnant patients were excluded.

Three functional outcome measures were used – Constant-Murley Shoulder Score, DASH and the Oxford Shoulder Score. The patients completed all three outcome measures before and 2, 4 and 6 weeks after the subacromial injection. Simple randomisation method was used and blinded to both researcher and the patient.

58 patients randomised into two groups were reviewed at the end of six weeks. Patients treated with subacromial steroid injection had a much better outcome compared to patients treated with subacromial tenoxicam injection and this difference was highly significant (p< .003)

In conclusion, patients with subacromial impingement syndrome have a better clinical outcome when treated with subacromial steroid injection than NSAID injection.

The deltopectoral approach is a common approach for Shoulder joint replacements where a normal subscapularis tendon is divided. Despite meticulous attention to the subscapular repair, suboptimal return of function was found on clinical examination in 92% of patients (Miller S L: Journal of Shoulder & Elbow Surgery. 12(1): 29–34, February 2003). Therefore the aim was to study the integrity of the Subscapularis tendon in patients with Shoulder joint Replacements both clinical and ultrasound examination

Methods: A cohort of 25 subjects who had undergone Copeland Shoulder replacements through deltopectoral approach were included. All patients had same technique of tendon-to-tendon repair and postoperative rehabilitation. After ethics committee approval subjects were evaluated prospectively with Lift off test, Belly press test and the Constant score. Average follow-up was 29.6 months. An experienced Radiologist performed the Ultrasound examination

Results: Ultrasound examination showed 8 % (2 of 25) had full thickness rupture of subscapularis with 44% (11 of 25) showed mild to moderate atrophy of subscapularis muscle and 12%(3 of 25) severe atrophy. 20%(5 of 25) had Lift off test and Belly press test positive. 40%(10 of 25) had either or both of these tests positive. 60%(15 of 25) had clinical or radiological evidence of reduced function (Fisher exact test, P < 0.01). Constant score are 37.5 with full thickness tears compared to 59.4 with intact subsapularis tendon

Conclusion: Subscapularis tendon function following shoulder replacement had received poor attention. It is deficient in over 60% of patients with joint replacement through Deltopectoral approach with tendon-to-tendon repair. We therefore conclude for this study that alternative techniques of subscapularis tendon repair or alternative approaches to the shoulder joint need to be considered to improve the functional outcome in these patients

The use of high resolution ultrasonography for the detection of rotator cuff tears has achieved only limited acceptance by orthopaedic surgeons. Uncertainty about the accuracy of ultrasonography may be a contributing factor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of high-resolution ultrasonography compared to shoulder arthroscopy in the detection of rotator cuff tears. 100 consecutive patients with shoulder pain in whom arthroscopic surgery was planned underwent standardized preoperative ultrasonography. The ultrasound examinations were done by a single experienced musculoskeletal radiologist using a standard protocol. The findings at ultrasound were classified into intact cuff, tendinopathy, partial-thickness tear, and full-thickness rotator cuff tears. The size of the tear was measured in centimetres. The location was designated as subscapularis, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, or a combination. All of the subsequent shoulder arthroscopies were done by a single surgeon. The presence or absence of a rotator cuff tear and the size and extent of the tear when present were recorded. We then compared the ultrasonographic findings with the definitive operative findings. For the detection of rotator cuff tears, ultrasound had a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 94%; accuracy 95%. There was 100% sensitivity for full thickness tears (specificity 91% and accuracy 95%), while for partial-thickness tears there was a sensitivity of 80%, (specificity 98% and accuracy 95%). In experienced hands, ultrasound is a highly accurate diagnostic method for detecting rotator cuff tears. The results of this study compare favourably with the published results of magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of this condition. Furthermore, dynamic imaging and comparison with the opposite shoulder is possible with ultrasonography.