To determine the relationship between articular cartilage status and clinical outcomes after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOHTO) for medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis at intermediate follow-up. We reviewed 155 patients (155 knees) who underwent MOHTO from January 2008 to December 2016 followed by second-look arthroscopy with a mean 5.3-year follow-up (2.0 to 11.7). Arthroscopic findings were assessed according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Repair Assessment (CRA) grading system. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of normal or nearly normal quality cartilage in the medial femoral condyle: good (second-look arthroscopic) status (ICRS grade I or II; n = 70), and poor (second-look arthroscopic) status (ICRS grade III or IV; n = 85) groups at the time of second-look arthroscopy. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and 36-Item Short Form survey.Aims
Methods
We performed a prospective study to examine the
influence of the patient’s position on the location of the abdominal
organs, to investigate the possibility of a true lateral approach
for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Pre-operative abdominal
CT scans were taken in 20 patients who underwent endoscopic lumbar discectomy.
Axial images in parallel planes of each intervertebral disc from
L1 to L5 were achieved in both supine and prone positions. The most
horizontal approach angles possible to avoid injury to the abdominal
organs were measured. The results demonstrated that the safe approach
angles were significantly less (i.e., more horizontal) in the prone
than in the supine position. Obstacles to a more lateral approach
were mainly the liver, the spleen and the kidneys at L1/2 (39 of
40, 97.5%) and L2/3 (28 of 40, 70.0%), and the intestines at L3/4
(33 of 40, 82.5%) and L4/5 (30 of 30, 100%). A true lateral approach
from each side was possible for 30 of the 40 discs at L3/4 (75%)
and 23 of the 30 discs at L4/5 (76.7%). We concluded that a more
horizontal approach for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy
is possible in the prone position but not in the supine. Prone abdominal
CT is more helpful in determining the trajectory of the endoscope.
While a true lateral approach is feasible in many patients, our
study shows it is not universally applicable.
