We obtained pre-operative and six-month post-operative Oxford hip (OHS) and knee scores (OKS) for 1523 patients who underwent total hip replacement and 1784 patients who underwent total knee replacement. They all also completed a six-month satisfaction question.

Scatter plots showed no relationship between pre-operative Oxford scores and six-month satisfaction scores. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were -0.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.09 to 0.01) between OHS and satisfaction and 0.04 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.08) between OKS and satisfaction. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify a cut-off point for the pre-operative OHS/OKS that identifies whether or not a patient is satisfied with surgery. We obtained an area under the ROC curve of 0.51 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.56) for hip replacement and 0.56 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.60) for knee replacement, indicating that pre-operative Oxford scores have no predictive accuracy in distinguishing satisfied from dissatisfied patients.

In the NHS widespread attempts are being made to use patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data for the purpose of prioritising patients for surgery. Oxford hip and knee scores have no predictive accuracy in relation to post-operative patient satisfaction. This evidence does not support their current use in prioritising access to care.

Introduction: Anteromedial gonarthrosis is a common well described pattern of knee osteoarthritis with cartilage wear beginning in the anteromedial quadrant of the medial tibial plateau in the presence of an intact and functioning ACL. It is well known that mechanical factors such as limb alignment and meniscal integrity affect the progression of arthritis and there is some evidence that the morphology of the tibial plateau may be a risk factor in the development of this disease. The extension facet angle is the angle of the downslope of the anterior portion of the medial tibial plateau joint surface in relation to the middle portion on a sagittal view. If this is an important factor in the development of AMG there may be potential for disease modifying intervention.

This study investigates if there is a significant difference in this angle as measured on MRI between a study cohort with early AMG (partial thickness cartilage damage and intact ACL) and a comparator control cohort of patients (no cartilage damage and ACL rupture).

Methods: 3 Tesla MRI scans of 99 patients; 54 with partial thickness cartilage damage and 44 comparitors with no cartilage damage (acute ACL rupture) were assessed. The extension facet angle was measured (Osirix v3.6) using a validated technique on two consecutive MRI T2 sagittal slices orientated at the mid-coronal point of the medial femoral condyle. (InterClass Correlation 0.95, IntraClass Correlation 0.97, within subject variation of 1.1° and coefficiant of variation 10.7%). The mean of the two extension angle values was used. The results were tabulated and analysed (R v2.9.1).

Results: Of the 99 knees, 38 were female and 61 male; 44 left knees and 55 right. The mean extension facet angle for the partial thickness group was 12.7° (SD 3.35) and for the comparator group 8.7° (SD 3.09). There was a significant difference between these 2 groups (Mann Whitney U, p< 0.001). Although there were significantly more men than women in the comparator group, stratification analysis showed that there was no effect of gender on the mean extension facet angle.

Discussion: There is a significance difference in the extension facet angle between patients with AMG with only partial thickness cartilage loss and a comparator group. This has not been shown in a study group of this size before. Since none of the subjects had full thickness cartilage loss it is unlikely that this difference is due to bone attrition changing the angle as part of the disease process but this is an important area for further study. We believe that a higher medial tibial extension facet angle alters the mechanics within the medial compartment, placing these patients at higher risk of developing AMG. This may present an opportunity for risk factor modification, for example osteotomy.

We have compared the outcome of hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in three distinct diagnostic groups, using survival analysis as used by the United Kingdom national joint registers, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as recommended by Darzi in the 2008 NHS review, and transition and satisfaction questions.

A total of 72 hemiarthroplasties, 19 for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with an intact rotator cuff, 22 for OA with a torn rotator cuff, and 31 for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), were followed up for between three and eight years. All the patients survived, with no revisions or dislocations and no significant radiological evidence of loosening. The mean new Oxford shoulder score (minimum/worst 0, maximum/best 48) improved significantly for all groups (p < 0.001), in the OA group with an intact rotator cuff from 21.4 to 38.8 (effect size 2.9), in the OA group with a torn rotator cuff from 13.3 to 27.2 (effect size 2.1) and in the RA group from 13.7 to 28.0 (effect size 3.1). By this assessment, and for the survival analysis, there was no significant difference between the groups. However, when ratings using the patient satisfaction questions were analysed, eight (29.6%) of the RA group were ‘disappointed’, compared with one (9.1%) of the OA group with cuff intact and one (7.7%) of the OA group with cuff torn. All patients in the OA group with cuff torn indicated that they would undergo the operation again, compared to ten (90.9%) in the OA group with cuff intact and 20 (76.9%) in the RA group.

The use of revision rates alone does not fully represent outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder. Data from PROMs provides more information about change in pain and the ability to undertake activities and perform tasks. The additional use of satisfaction ratings shows that both the rates of revision surgery and PROMs need careful interpretation in the context of patient expectations.